Republicanism and Political Participation: Republican Elements in the Conception of “Open Democracy”, by Hélène Landemore.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1517-0128.v40i1p19-31Keywords:
Democracy, Republicanism, Lottery, Liberty, Non-dominationAbstract
The persistent domination of political elites in the contemporary representative governments has led to an intense reflection, in recent years, about the limits and capabilities of democracy as a system of government. Problems such as the persistence of deep social inequalities and the inability to include minorities – and even majorities, as in the Brazilian case – point to a process of “oligarchization” of democracies, marked by an attempt to “political neutralization of the people”, incompatible with republican and democratic values. In a case of such underrepresentation, in which majority sectors of society are systematically governed by minority sectors, how can the ideal of non-domination be ensured? Starting from the verification of the practical limits of contemporary representative governments in general, and of the Brazilian case, in particular, the purpose of this article is to discuss the extent to which Hélène Landemore's proposal of "open democracy", which proposes the recovery of the practice of drawing lots as an expression of the democratic element, is compatible with republican ideas.
Downloads
References
ARISTÓTELES, Política (edição bilíngue). Lisboa: Vega, 1998.
BIGNOTTO, Newton. “Problemas atuais da teoria republicana”. In: Retorno ao republicanismo. São Paulo: Humanitas, 2004.
BOURICIUS, Terril. “Democracy through multi-body sortitition: Athenian lessons for modern day”. In: Journal of public deliberation, v. 9, n.1., 2013, art. 11.
BRUGGER, Bill. Republican theory in political though. London: Macmillan Press, 1999.
EHRENBERG, Victor. The Greek State, New York, W.W. Norton and Co., 1964.
GOMME, A.W. The population of Athens in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries B.C. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1933.
HANSEN, M.H. The Athenian Democracy in the age of Demosthenes – Structure, Principles and Ideology. Oxford: T.J. Press, 1991.
HEADLAM, J. W. Election by lot at Athens. Norderstedt: Hansebooks, 2016.
LANDEMORE, Hélène. Open democracy: reinventing popular rule for the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.
MADISON, James; HAMILTON, Alexander e JAY, John. Os artigos federalistas. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1987.
MANIN, Bernard. Principes du gouvernment représentatif. Paris: Flammarion, 2012.
NASCIMENTO, MILTON M. do. A farsa da representação política: ensaio sobre o pensamento político de Rousseau. São Paulo: Discurso Editorial, 2016.
MONTESQUIEU. O Espírito das leis. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000.
MOWBRAY, Miranda and GOLLMANN, Dieter. “Electing the Doge of Venice: analysis of a 13th century protocol”. In: www.hpl.hp.com̸ techreports̸2007̸HPL-2007-28R1.pdf
PETTIT, Philip. Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
PITKIN, Hanna. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.
REYBROUK, David. Contra as eleições. Belo Horizonte: Ed. Âyine, 2017.
ROUSSEAU, J. -J. O contrato social. São Paulo, Martins Fontes, 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Rodrigo Ribeiro de Sousa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.