Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Authors

  • Huan Bei Zeng Wenzhou Medical University; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Xiao Zhou Ying Wenzhou Medical University; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Guang Jun Chen Wenzhou Medical University; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Xia Qing Yang Wenzhou Medical University; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Duo Duo Lin Wenzhou Medical University; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Zhi Jie Li Wenzhou Medical University; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Hai Xiao Liu Wenzhou Medical University; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(10)10

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish whether the use of an extramedullary or intramedullary tibial cutting guide leads to superior mechanical leg axis and implant positioning. A meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials including 350 knees was performed. For the mechanical axis, frontal tibial component angle and tibial slope, there were no significant differences in the mean values or the number of outliers (±3°) between the extramedullary and intramedullary groups. A reduced tourniquet time was associated with the intramedullary guide. No significant difference in the complication rate was noted between the two groups. Neither extramedullary nor intramedullary tibial alignment was more accurate in facilitating the tibial cut. Use of an intramedullary guide results in a shorter tourniquet time and exhibits a similar complication rate as the extramedullary guide.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-01

Issue

Section

Review

How to Cite

Zeng, H. B., Ying, X. Z., Chen, G. J., Yang, X. Q., Lin, D. D., Li, Z. J., & Liu, H. X. (2015). Extramedullary versus intramedullary tibial alignment technique in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials . Clinics, 70(10), 714-719. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(10)10