Effects of Motor Learning on Clinical Isokinetic Test Performance in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(04)02Keywords:
Aging, Isokinetic, Knee, Muscle Strength, OsteoarthritisAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the effects of motor learning on knee extension-flexion isokinetic performance in knee osteoarthritis patients. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-six middle-aged and older sedentary individuals (111 women, 64.3±9.9 years) with knee osteoarthritis (130 patients with bilateral) and who had never performed isokinetic testing underwent two bilateral knee extension-flexion (concentric-concentric) isokinetic evaluations (5 repetitions) at 60°/sec. The tests were first performed on the dominant leg with 2 min of recovery between test, and following a standardized warm-up that included 3 submaximal isokinetic repetitions. The same procedure was repeated on the non-dominant leg. The peak torque, peak torque adjusted for the body weight, total work, coefficient of variation and agonist/antagonist ratio were compared between tests. RESULTS: Patients showed significant improvements in test 2 compared to test 1, including higher levels of peak torque, peak torque adjusted for body weight and total work, as well as lower coefficients of variation. The agonist/antagonist relationship did not significantly change between tests. No significant differences were found between the right and left legs for all variables. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that performing two tests with a short recovery (2 min) between them could be used to reduce motor learning effects on clinical isokinetic testing of the knee joint in knee osteoarthritis patients.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2017-04-01
Issue
Section
Clinical Sciences
How to Cite
Rodrigues-da-Silva, J. M., de Rezende, M. U., Spada, T. C., da Silva Francisco, L., Greve, J. M. D., & Ciolac, E. G. (2017). Effects of Motor Learning on Clinical Isokinetic Test Performance in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients. Clinics, 72(4), 202-206. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(04)02