Cryopreservation time does not decrease follicular viability in ovarian tissue frozen for fertility preservation

Authors

  • Jacira Ribeiro Campos Oregon Health & Science University -Division Reproduction
  • Julio Cesar Rosa-e-Silva Universidade de São Paulo; Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Bruno Ramalho Carvalho Universidade de São Paulo; Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Alessandra Aparecida Vireque Universidade de São Paulo; Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Marcos Felipe Silva-de-Sá Universidade de São Paulo; Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Ana Carolina Japur de Sá Rosa-e-Silva Universidade de São Paulo; Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011001200015

Keywords:

Ovarian tissue, Cryopreservation, Tissue damage, Ovarian steroidogenesis, Tissue culture

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of storage duration on cryopreserved ovarian tissue using fresh and frozenthawed samples. METHODS: Seventeen fertile patients underwent an ovarian biopsy during elective laparoscopic tubal ligation. The tissue sample was divided into three parts: one part was processed fresh (FG), and two were slowly frozen, cryopreserved for 30 (G30) or 180 days (G180), thawed and analyzed. Follicular density, follicular viability, and steroidogenic capacity were assessed. RESULTS: We observed no differences between the groups in follicular density, which was assessed in hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections. A heterogeneous follicular distribution was observed in the parenchyma, with a mean density of 361.3±255.4, 454.9±676.3, and 296.8±269.0 follicles/mm3 for FG, G30 and G180, respectively (p = 0.46). Follicular viability was greater in FG (93.4%) when compared with the cryopreserved tissues (70.8% for G30 (p<0.001) and 78.4% for G180 (p<0.001)), with no difference in viability between the frozen samples (p>0.05). The steroidogenic capacity of the tissue was not significantly reduced following cryopreservation. CONCLUSION: The slow freezing procedures used for ovarian cryopreservation are capable of preserving follicular viability and maintaining the steroidogenic capacity of the tissue despite a roughly 30% decrease in follicular viability. Furthermore, short-term storage of ovarian tissue does not appear to compromise follicle integrity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2011-01-01

Issue

Section

Clinical Sciences

How to Cite

Cryopreservation time does not decrease follicular viability in ovarian tissue frozen for fertility preservation . (2011). Clinics, 66(12), 2093-2097. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011001200015