O rebanho e a rapina. Em torno do § 354 d’A gaia ciência
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2025.240583Keywords:
Friedrich Nietzsche, self-consciousness, communication, society, Claude Bernard, experimental medicineAbstract
Nietzsche relates the origin of self-consciousness (Bewusstsein) to communication through language and the creation of signs. As he shows in §354 of The Gay Science, the reciprocal relation between Bewusstsein and communication, which marks the “herd” character of the human species, connect the consciousness with the social relations that provides it – without a mediation of a metaphysical entity. To achieve this perspective, we will show how the notion of experience that comes from experimental medicine, as conceived by the French physiologist Claude Bernard, was crucial for Nietzsche to achieve his intention of thinking about the body and its impulses. Thus, the investigation into the constitution of identity through self-consciousness depends on looking at the problem of the birth of signs and life in society, conceived, then, from a certain sense given by the peculiarity of the experience of the “herd” and its interpretative counterpart, the “the beast of prey”.Downloads
References
Abel, G. (1998). Nietzsche: Die Dynamik der Willen zur Macht und die ewige Wiederkehrt. Auflage. Berlin, New York : de Gruyter.
Bernard, C. (1865). Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expérimentale. Paris: Libraires de l’académie impériale de médecine.
Coleman, W. (1978). Biology in the Nineteenth Century: Problems of Form, Function and Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diderot, D.; D’Alembert, J. le R. (2015) Enciclopédia, vols. II e III. Trad. Maria das Graças de Souza e Pedro Paulo Pimenta. São Paulo: Unesp.
Emden, C. (2014) Nietzsche’s Naturalism – Philosophy and the Life Sciences in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Forster, Michael. (1898) Claude Bernard. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.
Forster, Michael. (1880). Lehrbuch der Physiologie. Heidelberg: C. Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.
Gerhardt, V. (1988). Pathos und Distanz. Studien zur Philosophie Friedrich Nietzsches. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Loukidelis, N. (2013). Es denkt: Ein Kommentar zum Aphorismus 17 aus “Jenseits von Gut und Böse”. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Müller-Lauter, W. (1978). “Der Organismus als innerer Kampf. Der Einfluss von Wilhelm Roux auf Friedrich Nietzsche”. Nietzsche-Studien, 7, p. 189-223.
Nietzsche, F. (1999). Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe (15 vols.). G. Colli und M. Montinari (Org.). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Nietzsche, F. (2014). Obras Incompletas. Trad. Rubens Rodrigues Torres Filho. São Paulo: Editora 34.
Schlimgen, E. (1999). Nietzsches Theorie des Bewußtsein. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Schopenhauer, A. (2016). O mundo como vontade e como representação. Tomo II. Trad. Jair Barboza. São Paulo: Unesp.
Simon, J. (1984). “Das Problem des Bewußtseins bei Nietzsche und der traditionelle Bewußtseinsbegriff”. In: Zur Aktualiltät Nietzsches, Zweiter Band. Würz-burg: Koenigshausen & Neumann, p. 17-33.
Stegmaier, W. (2012). Befreiung der Philosophie: Kontextuelle Interpretation Des V. Buchs Der Fröhlichen Wissenschaft. Berlin, New York: de Gruyer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lara Pimentel Anastacio

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
O trabalho da Discurso foi licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Os autores aqui publicados mantém os direitos sobre seus artigos
De acordo com os termos seguintes:
-
Atribuição [BY] — Deve-se dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas.
-
NãoComercial [NC] — É proibido o uso deste material para fins comerciais.
-
CompartilhaIgual [SA] — Caso haja remixagem, transformação ou criação a partir do material, é necessário distribuir as suas contribuições sob a mesma licença que o original.
