Governance experiences in ecosystem and landscape restoration in Brazil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.2022.36106.013

Keywords:

Multiplayer coalitions, Governance innovations, Multisectoral platforms, Networks

Abstract

Brazil has a long history of policies, research and practice to restore degraded ecosystems. The United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021-2030) was launched with the primary objective of preventing, halting and reversing the degradation of ecosystems worldwide. Here, we describe some experiences with ecosystem restoration in Brazil and illustrate how they can contribute to achieving these goals. Forest restoration actions in Brazil are strongly motivated and led by decentralized civil society associations and multisectoral coalitions and platforms. We highlight the critical role of governance innovations at the regional, state and municipal levels that strengthen restoration actions despite the poor implementation of federal government initiatives. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADAMS, C. et al. Governança da restauração florestal da paisagem no Brasil: desafios e oportunidades. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente v.58, p.450-73, jul./dez. 2021.

AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE ÁGUAS. Nota informativa Programa Produtor de Água. 2018. 17 p. Disponível em: <https://www.ana.gov.br/todososdocumentosdoportal/documentossip/produtordeagua/documentosrelacionados/1notainformativaprogramaprodutordeagua.p>. Acesso em: Set. 2021.

CALMON, M. Restauração de florestas e paisagens em larga escale: O Brasil na liderança global. Ciência e Cultura v.73, p.44-8, 2021.

CHAVES, R. B. et al. On the need of legal frameworks for assessing restoration projects success: new perspectives from São Paulo state (Brazil). Restoration Ecology, v.23, p.754-9, 2015.

CHAZDON, R.; BRANCALION, P. Restoring forests as a means to many ends. Science v.365, n.6448, p.24-5, 2019.

CHAZDON, R. L. et al. Key challenges for governing forest and landscape restoration across different contexts. Land Use Policy, v.104, p.104854, May 2021.

CONSERVADOR DA MANTIQUEIRA 2016. Disponível em: <http://conservadordamantiqueira.org/ Governo do Espírito Santo>. Acesso em: Ago, 2011.

ISERNHAGEN, I. L.; MORAES, F. D.; ENGEL, V. L. The Rise of the Brazilian Network for Ecological Restoration (REBRE): What Brazilian Restorationists Have Learned from Networking. Restoration Ecology v.25, n.2, p.172-7, 2017.

LAPIG (Laboratório de Processamento de Imagens e Geoprocessamento). Digital Atlas of Brazilian Pastures. Goiás: Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2020. Disponível em: <https://pastagem.org/map>. Acesso em: Set, 2021.

LEI DE PROTEÇÃO DA VEGETAÇÃO NATIVA. Disponível em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato20112014/2012/lei/l12651.htm>. Acesso em: Set. 2021.

MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Planaveg: Plano Nacional de Recuperação da Vegetação Nativa. Brasília, DF: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, Ministério da Educação, 73 p., 2017.

NAGENDRA, H.; OSTROM, E. Polycentric governance of multifunctional forested landscapes. International Journal of the Commons, v.6, n. 2, p.104-33, 2012.

RICHARDS, R. C. et al. Governing a pioneer program on payment for watershed services: Stakeholder involvement, legal frameworks and early lessons from the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Ecosystem Services, v.16, p.23-32, 2015.

SANCHES, R. A.; FUTEMMA, C. R. T.; ALVES, H. Q. Indigenous territories and governance of forest restoration in the Xingu River (Brazil). Land Use Policy, v.104, p.104755, 2021.

SCHMIDT, M. V. C. et al. Indigenous knowledge and forest succession management in the Brazilian Amazon: Contributions to reforestation of degraded areas. Front. For. Glob. Change, v.4, p.605925, 2021.

SECRETARIA DE MEIO AMBIENTE, PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL DE EXTREMA. Conservador das Águas: 10 anos. 2019. Disponível em: <https://www.extrema.mg.gov.br/conservadordasaguas/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Conservador-da-%C3%81guas_Livreto_12_ANOS_WEB.pdf>. Acesso em: Set. 2021.

SIQUEIRA, L. P. et al. Engaging People for Large-Scale Forest Restoration: Governance Lessons from the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. In: MARQUES, M. C. M.; GRELLE, C. E. V. (Ed.) The Atlantic Forest: History, Biodiversity, Threats and Opportunities of the Mega-diverse Forest. Springer Nature, 2021, p.389-402. Disponível em:<https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55322-7_18>. Acesso em: Set. 2021.

UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME. The United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration Strategy. 2021. Disponível em: <https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/31813/ERDStrat.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y>. Acesso em: Set. 2021.

URZEDO, D. I. D. et al. Seed networks for upscaling forest landscape restoration: is it possible to expand native plant sources in Brazil? Forests, v.11, n.3, p.259, 2020.

VIANI, R. A. et al. Synergism between payments for water-related ecosystem services, ecological restoration, and landscape connectivity within the Atlantic Forest hotspot. Tropical Conservation Science, v.11, p.1-9, 2018.

VIEIRA, R. R. S. et al. Compliance to Brazil’s Forest Code will not protect biodiversity and ecosystem services. Diversity and Distributions, v.24, n. 4, p.434-8, 2018.

Published

2022-12-22

How to Cite

Chazdon, R. L., Chaves, R. B., Calmon, M., Siqueira, L. P. de, & Junqueira, R. G. P. (2022). Governance experiences in ecosystem and landscape restoration in Brazil. Estudos Avançados, 36(106), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.2022.36106.013