Assessing Brazil’s information diffusion power: a structural hole approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/1980-5330/ea153817Palabras clave:
Information and knowledge Diffusion, networks, Qualitative input-output.Resumen
The objective of this article is to verify the sectors’ capacity to diffuse information and knowledge in the Brazilian economy between 2010 and 2015. The input-output technique is used with contributions in network theory and the Structural hole concept, developed by Burt (1992). The results indicate a relevant capacity to diffuse information and knowledge in the economy. This capacity declined in this period. There is a small decline in the diffusion power of the manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors between the years 2010 and 2015. Low, medium-low and medium technological activities showed a strong capacity to disseminate information throughout the network.
Descargas
Referencias
Ambrozio, A. M. H. P. & Melo, L. P. (2017). A nova imagem do setor de serviços. Textos Para Discussão - BNDES, Rio de Janeiro, v. 1, n. 119, p. 1–36, jan.
Aroche Reyes, F. (1995). Cambio tecnico y cambio estructural. La Hipótesis de coeficientes decrescientes. Pruebas estadísticas com datos para México. Estúdios Económicos, v. 10, n. 2, p. 147–162.
Assa, J. (2015). Financial Output as Economic Input: Resolving the Inconsistent Treatment of Financial Services in the National Accounts. Department of Economics. Department of Economics, The New School for Social Research.
Baumol, W. J. (1986). Information Technology and Service Sector: A Feedback Process?. In: FAUHABER, G. (ed.). Services in Transition. The Impact of Information Technology on the Service Sector. 2. ed. Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger Pub. Co.
Borgatti, P. S. (1997). Structural holes: unpacking Burt’s redundancy measures. Connections, v. 20, n. 1, p. 35–38.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analysing Social Networks. Ucinet for windows: software for social network analysis. Sage Publications Ltd.
Burt, R. S. (1988). The stability of American markets. American Journal of Sociology, v. 93, p. 356–395.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure of competititon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cassiolato, J. E. & Vitorino, V. e. (2011). Brics and Development Alternatives: Innovation Systems and Policies. London: Anthem Press, 206 p.
Chang, H. J. (2014). Manufacturing: statements, opening statements and manufacturing: statements,rebuttal statements. The Economist. Disponível em <http://www.economist.com/debate/days/view/714>. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2014.
Cohen, S. & Zysman, J. (1987). Manufacturing matters: the myth of the postindustrial economy. New York: Basic Books.
Dasgupta, S. & Singh, A. (2005). Will services be the new engine of Indian economic growth?. Development and Change, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1035–57.
Dietzenbacher, E. & Luna, R I, B. N. (2005). Using average propagation lengths to identify production chains in the Andalusian economy. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, v. 23, n. 2, p. 405–422.
Galindo Rueda, F. & Verguer, F. (2016). OECD Taxonomy of Economic Activities Based on R&D Intensity. OECD Science. Technology and IndustryWorking Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris, abr.
García Muñiz, A. S., Morillas, A. R. & Ramos, C. R. (2010). Spanish and European innovation diffusion: a structural hole approach in the input-output field. Annals of Regional Science, n. 44, p. 147–165.
Gonçalves, E. & Ferreira Neto, A. B. (2016). Intersectoral flows of technological knowledge in emerging countries: an input-output analysis. Revista de la Cepal, n. 118, p. 139–155.
Granovetter, M. S. (1974). Getting a job. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Hanneman, R. A. & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/ hanneman/).
Hidalgo, C. (2015). Why information grows: the evolution of order, from atoms to economies. New York: Basic books.
Hidalgo, C. & Hausmann, R. (2011). The network structure of economic output. Journal of Economic Growth, v. 16, n. 4, p. 309–342.
Hirschman, A. D. (1959). The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Jacinto, A. P. & Pontual, E. P. (2015). Revista Economia Aplicada, Local, v. 19, n. 3, p. 401–427.
Jackson,M. O. (2008). Social and economic networks. UK: Princeton University Press.
Kaldor, N. (1968). Productivity and growth in manufacturing industry: a reply. Economica, new series, Local, v. 35, n. 140, p. 385–91.
Kon, A. (2003). Atividades Terciárias: induzidas ou indutoras do desenvolvimento econômico? In: FERRAZ, J.C., CROCCO, Marco e ELIAS, L.A. Liberalização econômica e desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Futura.
Kon, A. (2013). Atividades dos serviçoes como indutoras do desenvolvimento. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Políticas, n. 34, p. 57–87.
Lahr, M. L. & Dietzenbacher, E. e. (2001). Input-output analysis: Frontiers and extensions. Basingstone, UK: Palgrave.
Leontief, W. (1986). Input-Output Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mansfield, E. (1971). Technological Change. An Introduction to a Vital Area of Modern Economics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Mazzucatto, M. (2014). The Entrepreneurial State: debunking public vs. private sector myths. London and New York: Anthem Press.
Miller, R. E. & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mohnem, P. (2001). International R&D Spillovers and Economic Growth. In: M. Pohjola (Ed.). Information Technology, Productivity, and Economic Growth: International Evidence and Implications for EconomicDevelopment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 55–71.
Ocampo, J. A., Rada, C. & Taylor, L. (2009). Growth and policy in developing countries: a structuralist approach. New York: Columbia University Press, 178 p.
OECD - Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico (2003). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2003. OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2003-en.
OECD - Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico (2011). ISIC Rev. 3 technology intensity definition. OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, jul.
Rodrik, D. (2010). Políticas de diversificação econômica. Revista CEPAL, Número especial.
Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scherer, F. (1982). Interindustry technology flows and productivity growth. Review of Economics and Statistics, n. 64, p. 627–34.
Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J. (1994). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper and Brothers, New York.
Shaik, A. M. & Tonak, E. A. (1994). Measuring the wealth of nations: the political economy of national accounts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 380 p.
Souza, N. J. (1988). Agricultura e integração industrial no Brasil. Revista Ensaios FEE, v. 9, n. 2, p. 46–63.
Syrquin, M. (1988). Patterns of structural change. In: H. Chenery and T. Srinivasan (eds). Handbook of development economics. London: Elsevier.
VieiraFilho, J. E. R., Santos, G. R. & Fornazier, A. (2013). Distribuição produtiva e tecnológica da agricultura brasileira e sua heterogeneidade estrutural. CEPAL–IPEA, Brasilia, n. 54. (Textos para Discussão).
Wolff, E. N. (1997). Spillovers, linkages and technical change. Economic Systems Research, v. 9, n. 1, p. 9–23.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Economia Aplicada
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
