Enseñar con Inteligencia Artificial: grado de aceptación de la IA educativa en el ámbito universitario latinoamericano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202551290821esResumo
El notable avance de la IA, especialmente tras la introducción de ChatGPT3 en el ámbito educativo, ha estimulado investigaciones sobre las actitudes, niveles de aceptación, formación disponible y el impacto de las creencias pedagógicas en el uso o rechazo de la IA por parte del alumnado y del profesorado. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar el grado de aceptación dela Inteligencia Artificial Educativa (IAEd) por parte del profesorado, su uso y factores que influyen en dichas decisiones, a través de un diseño de investigación ex post facto, con una muestra de 425 docentes participantes. Entre los resultados más relevantes, se observa una tendencia generalizada entre el profesorado hacia posiciones constructivistas para el desarrollo de acciones formativas con IAEd. Destaca la robustez y consistencia del instrumento de medición utilizado. Los datos indican que el nivel de aceptación de la IAEd por los docentes es muy elevado, y que aquellos con creencias constructivistas muestran una mayor predisposición a integrar estas tecnologías en su práctica docente, en comparación con quienes mantienen orientaciones más tradicionales o transmisivas.
Downloads
Referências
ADEKUNLE, Musa; TEMITAYO, Ismaila; ADELAN, Owolabi; ARULEBA, Kehinde; SUNDAY, Solomon. Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 3, p. 100099, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
AL DARAYSEH, Abdulla. Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers’ perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 4, p. 100132, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132
AL-ADWAN, Ahmad; AL-DEBEI, Mutaz. The determinants of Gen Z´s metaverse adoption decisions in higher education: integrating UTAUT2 with personal innovativeness in IT. Education and Information Technologies, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12080-1
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12080-1
ALENEZI, Mogbel Aid; MOHAMED, Amr; SHAABAN, Tahany. Revolucionando la educación especial del inglés como lengua extranjera: cómo ChatGPT está transformando la forma en que los profesores abordan el aprendizaje de idiomas. Innoeduca: International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, v. 9, n. 2, p. 5-23, 2023. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2023.v9i2.16774
» https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2023.v9i2.16774
AN, Xin; CHAI, Ching; LI, Yushun; ZHOU, Ying; SHEN, Xi; ZHENG, Chunping; CHEN, Mengyuan. Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools. Education and Information Technologies, v. 28, n. 5, p. 5187-5208, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11286-z
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11286-z
ARANCIBIA-HERRERA, Marcelo; CASTRO-APPELHANZ, María Jesús; SIGERSON, Andrew. Relaciones entre concepciones y competencias TIC: estudio de nueve secuencias didácticas de profesores chilenos. Educação e Pesquisa, v. 50, p. e260125, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202450260125es
» https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-4634202450260125es
AYANWALE, Musa Adekunle; SANUSI, Ismalia Temitayo; ADELAN, Owolabi Paul; ARULEBA, Kehinde; OYELERE, Solomon Sunday. Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 3, p. 100099, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
BACCI, Silvia; CAVIEZEL, Valeria. Multilevel IRT models for the university teaching evaluation. Journal of Applied Statistics, v. 38, n. 12, p. 2775-2791, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2011.570316
» https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2011.570316
BAGOZZI, Richard; YI, Youjae. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v. 16, p. 74-94, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
» https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
BAHÇIVAN, Eralp; GÜNEŞ, Erhan; ÜSTÜNDAĞ, Mutlu. A comprehensive model covering prospective teachers’ technology use: the relationships among self, teaching and learning conceptions and attitudes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, v. 27, n. 4, p. 399-416, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1479296
» https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2018.1479296
BARROSO, Julio; CABERO, Julio; GUTIERREZ, Juan Jesús. La producción de objetos de aprendizaje en realidad aumentada por estudiantes universitarios: grado de aceptación de esta tecnología y motivación para su uso. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, v. 23, n. 79, p. 1261-1283, 2018.
BICE, Holli; TANG, Hengtao. Teachers’ beliefs and practices of technology integration at a school for students with dyslexia: A mixed methods study. Education and Information Technologies, v. 27, p. 10179-10205, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11044-1
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11044-1
BURKE, Paul; SCHUCK, Sandy; AUBUSSON, Peter; KEARNEY, Matthew; FRISCHKNECHT, Barte. Exploring teacher pedagogy, stages of concern and accessibility as determinants of technology adoption. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, v. 27, n. 2, p. 149-163, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1387602
» https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1387602
CABERO, Julio; LLORENTE, Carmen; PALACIOS, Antonio; GALLEGO, Óscar. Degree of acceptance of virtual reality by health sciences students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 20, n. 8, p. 5571, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085571
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20085571
CABERO, Julio; MARÍN, Verónica. Análisis factorial de una escala de creencias sobre la enseñanza y su relación con características personales y profesionales de docentes de educación superior. Espacios, v. 41, n. 2, p. 1-25, 2020.
CARMINES, Edwar; ZELLER, Richard. Reliability and validity assessment. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1979.
CHENG, Sheng-Lu; CHANG, Jen-Chia; ROMERO, Kayleigh. Are pedagogical beliefs an internal barrier for technology integration? The interdependent nature of teacher beliefs. Education and Information Technologies, [v. 27, p. 5215-5232, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10835-2
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10835-2
CHOCARRO, Raquel; CORTINAS, Mónica; MARCOS-MATÁS, Gustavo. Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: A technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics. Educational Studies, v. 49, n. 2, p. 295-313, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426
» https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426
CHOI, Seongyune; JANG, Yeonju; KIM, Hyeoncheol. Influence of pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust on teachers’ acceptance of educational artificial intelligence tools. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, v. 39, n. 4, p. 910-922, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145
» https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145
CROMPTON, Helen; BURKE, Diane. Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, v. 20, n. 1, p. 22, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
DAVIS, Fred. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, v. 13, n. 3, p. 319-340, 1989.
DELGADO, Nahia; CAMPO CARRASCO, Lucía; SAINZ DE LA MAZA, Martín; ETXABE-URBIETA, José María. Aplicación de la inteligencia artificial (IA) en educación: Los beneficios y limitaciones de la IA percibidos por el profesorado de educación primaria, educación secundaria y educación superior. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, v. 27, n. 1, p. 207-224, 2024. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.577211
» https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.577211
GANSSER, Oliver; REICH, Christina. A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application. Technology in Society, v. 65, p. 101535, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101535
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101535
GARCÍA, Antero; KELLY, Mary Rose; STAMATIS, Kristina. When technology goes unnoticed: teacher beliefs and assumptions about technology use in three 9th grade English classrooms. Pedagogies: An International Journal, v. 17, n. 1, p. 54-75, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2020.1781638
» https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2020.1781638
GARCÍA DE BLANES, María García; SARMIENTO, José Ramón; ANTONOVICA, Arta. Tam versus UTAUT models: A contrasting study of scholarly production and its bibliometric analysis. Revisión Tecno. Revista Internacional de Tecnología, Ciencia y Sociedad, v. 12, n. 3, p. 1-27, 2022.
GONZÁLEZ-MAYORGA, Héctor; RODRÍGUEZ-ESTEBAN, Agustín; VIDAL, Javier. El uso del modelo GPT de OpenAI para el análisis de textos abiertos en investigación educativa. Pixel-Bit. Revista De Medios Y Educación, n. 69, p. 227-253, 2024. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.102032
» https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.102032
HERNÁNDEZ-SAMPIERI, Roberto; MENDOZA, Christian Paulina. Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Ciudad de México: McGraw-Hill, 2018.
HOAREAU, Lara; THOMAS, Aude; TAZOUTI, Youssef; DINET, Jerome; LUXEMBOURGER, Christophe; JARLÉGAN, Anette. Beliefs about digital technologies and teachers’ acceptance of an educational app for preschoolers. Computers & Education, v. 172, p. 104264, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104264
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104264
HUANG, Fei-Hui. Adapting UTAUT2 to assess user acceptance of an e-scooter virtual reality service. Virtual Reality, v. 24, p. 635-643, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00424-7
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00424-7
IFINEDO, Eloho; RIKALA, Jenni; HÄMÄLÄINEN, Timo. Factors affecting Nigerian teacher educators’ technology integration: Considering characteristics, knowledge constructs, ICT practices and beliefs. Computers & Education, v. 146, p. 103760, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103760
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103760
LEE, Un-Kon; KIM, Hyekyung. UTAUT in Metaverse: An “Ifland” case. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, v. 17, n. 2, p. 613-635, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer1702003
» https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer1702003
LI, Yaoran; GARZA, Veronica; KEICHER, Anne; POPOV, Vitaliy. Predicting high school teacher use of technology: pedagogical beliefs, technological beliefs and attitudes, and teacher training. Tech Know Learn, v. 24, p. 501-518, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9355-2
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9355-2
MA, Shuaiyao; LEI, Lei. The factors influencing teacher education students’ willingness to adopt artificial intelligence technology for information-based teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, v. 44, n. 1, p. 94-111, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305155
» https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305155
MARÍN, Verónica; SAMPEDRO, Begoña; VEGA, Esther. Creencias del profesorado de educación secundaria en torno al uso de la realidad mixta en el aula. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, v. 26, n. 1, p. 85-97, 2023. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.543331
» https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.543331
MATEO, Juan Mateo. La investigación ex post-facto. In: BISQUERRA, Rafael (coord.). Metodología de la investigación. Cidade: La Muralla, 2004. p. 195-230.
McDONALD, Roderick. Test theory: A unified treatment. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999.
MOJARRO, Ángel; DUARTE, Ana María; GUZMÁN, María Dolores; AGUADED, Ignacio. Mobile learning in university contexts based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, v. 8, n. 1, p. 7-17, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.317
» https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.317
MONTANARES, Elisabeth Gloria; JUNOD, Pablo Antonio. Creencias y prácticas de enseñanza de profesores universitarios en Chile. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, v. 20, n. 1, p. 93-103, 2018. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.1.1383
» https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.1.1383
O’DWYER, Laura; BERNAUER, James. Quantitative research for the qualitative researcher. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2013.
PALACIOS-RODRÍGUEZ, Antonio; LLORENTE-CEJUDO, Carmen; LUCAS, Margarida; BEM-HAJA, Pedro. Macroevaluación de la competencia digital docente. Estudio DigCompEdu en España y Portugal. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, v. 28, n. 1, 2025. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.28.1.41379
» https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.28.1.41379
PRESTRIDGE, Sarah. Examining the shaping of teachers’ pedagogical orientation for the use of technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, v. 26, n. 4, p. 367-381, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1258369
» https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1258369
PRESTRIDGE, Sarah. The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, v. 58, n. 1, p. 449-458, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028
RAMÍREZ-MONTOYA, María Soledad. Estrategias de innovación para ambientes de aprendizaje. Madrid: Síntesis, 2022.
RODRÍGUEZ-SABIOTE, Clemente; VALERIO-PEÑA, Ana Teresa; BATISTA-ALMONTE, Roberto. Validación de una escala del modelo ampliado de aceptación de la tecnología en el contexto dominicano. Pixel-Bit: Revista De Medios Y Educación, n. 68, p. 217-244, 2023. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.100352
» https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.100352
SAMPEIRO, Víctor Manuel. Ecuaciones estructurales en los modelos educativos: características y fases en su construcción. Apertura, v. 11, n. 1, p. 90-103, 2019. https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v11n1.1402
» https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v11n1.1402
STRZELECKI, Artur. To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
» https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881
TAMILMANI, Kuttimani; RANA, Nripendra; WAMBA, Samuel; DWIVEDI, Rohita. The extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation. International Journal of Information Management, v. 57, p. 102269, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269
TEMITAYO, Ismaila; ADEKUNLE, Musa; TOLORUNLEKE, Adebayo. Investigating pre-service teachers’ artificial intelligence perception from the perspective of planned behavior theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, v. 6, p. 100202, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100202
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100202
TONDEUR, Jo; VAN BRAAK, Johan; ERTMER, Peggy; OTTENBREIT-LEFTWICH, Anne. Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, v. 65, p. 555-575, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
TOURÓN, Javier (ed.) Análisis de datos y medida en educación. v. II. Logroño: Unir, 2023.
USTUN, Ahmet; KARAOGLAN-YILMAZ, Fatma; YILMAZ, Ramazan. Educational UTAUT-based virtual reality acceptance scale: a validity and reliability study. Virtual Reality, v. 27, p. 1063-1076, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00717-4
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00717-4
UYGUN, Derya. Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence in education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, v. 4, n. 1, p. 931-939, 2024. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.005
» https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.005
VENKATESH, Viswanath; MORRIS, M.; DAVIS, Gordon; DAVIS, Fred. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, v. 27, n. 3, p. 425-478, 2003.
VENKATESH, Viswanath; THONG, James; XU, Xin. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, v. 36, n. 1, p. 157-178, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
» https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
WALUYO, Budi; APRIDAYANI, Aisah. Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices on the use of video in English Language Teaching. Studies in English Language and Education, v. 8, n. 2, p. 726-744, 2021. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19214
» https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19214
YUK, Cecilia; LEE, Katherine. The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, v. 10, n. 60, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
ZACHARIS, Georgios; NIKOLOPOULOU, Kleopatra. Factors predicting University students’ behavioral intention to use eLearning platforms in the postpandemic normal: an UTAUT2 approach with ‘Learning Value’. Education and Information Technologies, v. 27, p. 12065-12082, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11116-2
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11116-2
ZULKARNAIN, Nur Sakinah; YUNUS, Melor. Teachers’ perceptions and continuance usage intention of artificial intelligence technology in TESL. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, v. 6, n. 5, p. 2101-2109, 2023. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v6-i5-34
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Educação e Pesquisa
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A publicação do artigo em Educação e Pesquisa implica, automaticamente, por parte do(s) autor(es) a cessão integral e exclusiva dos direitos autorais da primeira edição para a revista, sem quaisquer honorários.
Após a primeira publicação, os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais, independentes da revista, para a divulgação do trabalho por outros meios (ex.: repositório institucional ou capítulo de livro), desde que citada a fonte completa, com as referências da mesma autoria e dos dados da publicação original.
As ideias e opiniões expressas no artigo são de exclusiva responsabilidade do autor, não refletindo, necessariamente, as opiniões da revista.
