THE ESSENCE OF TRUTH ACCORDING TO SPINOZA

Authors

  • Ulysses Pinheiro Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-9012.espinosa.2025.239947

Keywords:

Spinoza, definition of truth, properties, essence

Abstract

This article challenges the usual interpretations of Spinoza’s theory of truth. As is well known, Spinoza asserts that the properties of a true idea are either intrinsic or extrinsic to the being of that idea. Commentators generally accept that truth, in Spinoza’s system, must be defined either on the basis of one of these properties or on their conjunction, differing only in the function and relative importance attributed to each in the definition of truth. Against this assumption shared by interpreters, according to which the definition of truth must be constructed out of the properties of the true idea, I will show that such a premise distorts Spinoza’s understanding of truth. This distortion occurs because it does not take into account that a central doctrine of Spinoza’s thought is that a thing is never defined by its properties, but rather that the latter must be deduced from the essence of the thing, which is established prior to them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ulysses Pinheiro, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

    Professor, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

References

Alquié, Ferdinand. (1981). Le rationalisme de Spinoza. Paris: PUF.

Aristóteles. (1984). Categorias e Segundos analíticos. In: The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 volumes. Editado por Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Bayle, Pierre. (1734). Dictionnaire historique et critique. Cinquième édi-tion : Amsterdam, Compagnie des Libraires; 5 vols. in-folio. Remarques de l’abbé Le Clerc à la fin de chaque volume URL: http://artfl-project.uchicago.edu/node/60

Bennet, Jonathan. (1984). A Study of Sponoza’s Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Chaui, Marilena. (2016). A nervura do real II. Imanência e liberdade em Espinosa. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

Curley, Edwin. (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: an essay in interpretation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

DeBrabander, Firmin. (2007). Spinoza and the Stoics. Power, Politics and the Passions. London: Continuum.

Deleuze, Gilles. (1981). Spinoza. Philosophie pratique. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

Descartes, René. (1996). Responsio ad quartas Objectiones. OEuvres de Des-cartes publiées par Charles Adam et Paul Tannery. Meditationes de pri-ma philosophiæ. VII. Paris : Vrin.

Gleizer, Marcos André. (1999). Verdade e certeza em Spinoza. Porto Alegre: L&PM.

__________. (2014). Metafísica e conhecimento: ensaios sobre Descartes e Espinosa. Rio de Janeiro: EdUERJ.

Gueroult, Martial. (1969). Spinoza 1. Dieu. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.

__________. (1974). Spinoza II – L’Âme (Ethique, II). Hildesheim / New York: Georg Olms Verlag.

Hampshire, Stuart. (1981). Spinoza. New York: Penguin Books.

Jaquet, Chantal. (2011). “Do eu ao si: a refundação da interioridade em Spinoza”. In: Martins, André; Santiago, Homero; Oliva, Luís César (Org.). As ilusões do eu: Spinoza e Nietzsche. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.

Joachim, Harold. (1940). Spinoza’s Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione: A Commentary. Oxford : Clarendon Press.

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. (1999). Discours de métaphysique. Leibniz Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe. Herausgegeben von der Berlin−Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen. Sechste Reihe - Philosophische Schriften. Vierter Band. Akademie Verlag

Malebranche, Nicolas. (1979). De la recherche de la vérité. Texto estabelecido, apresentado e anotado por Geneviève Rodis-Lewis. In: Malebranche. OEuvres. Paris: Gallimard.

Mark, Thomas Carson. (1972). Spinoza’s Theory of Truth. New York: Columbia University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. (1964). Le visible et l’invisible. Texto estabelecido por Claude Lefort. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.

Miller, John. (2018). Spinoza and the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Noorloos, R. (2024). “Spinoza’s Really Confused Ideas”, Journal of Spinoza Studies, 3, no. 2: 49–65, doi: https://doi.org/10.21827/jss.3.2.41256

Spinoza, Baruch. (1925). Baruch de Spinoza Opera. Ed. de Carl Gebhardt. Heidelberg: Carl Winters, 4 volumes.

_____________. (2015a). Tratado da Emenda do Intelecto. Tradução de Cristiano Novaes de Rezende. Campinas, SP: Editora da Unicamp

_____________. Ética. (2015b). Tradução do Grupo de Estudos Espinosanos; coordenação de Marilena Chaui. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo

_____________. (2010). Correspondance. Apresentação, tradução e notas de Maxime Rovere. Paris: Éditions Flammarion.

_____________. (2009). Premiers écrits. Tractatus de intellectus emenda-tione e Korte Verhandeling. In: Spinoza. OEuvres I. Paris: Presses Univer-sitaires de France.

Tomás de Aquino. (2009). Suma Teológica, Parte I, Questões 1-43. Texto latino da Editio Leonina reproduzido na Edição Marietti. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.

______________. (1970-6). Quaestiones disputatae de veritate. in: Opera Omnia. Organização de Enrique Alárcon. Universidad de Navarra, 2000. Disponível em <https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/qdv01. html>. [51583] De veritate, q. 1 a. 1 co. Acesso em 11 de agosto de 2025

Walker, Ralph C. S (1985). “Spinoza and the Coherence Theory of Truth”. Mind, New Series, Vol. 94, No. 373, p. 1-18. Wilson, Margaret D. (1975). “Review of Spinoza’s Theory of Truth”, by Tho-mas Carson Mark. In: The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 72, No. 1 (Jan.), pp. 22-25.

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Pinheiro, U. (2025). THE ESSENCE OF TRUTH ACCORDING TO SPINOZA. Cadernos Espinosanos, 53, 17-55. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-9012.espinosa.2025.239947