On the spinozist source of the radical Enlightenment and its conflicting latin american traces

Authors

  • Braulio Rojas Castro Universidad de Playa Ancha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-9012.espinosa.2025.238416

Keywords:

Political philosophy, Radical Enlightenment, Latin American spinozism, Political power, Materialism

Abstract

This article develops a brief account of how Jonathan Israel's historical-conceptual category ‘Radical Enlightenment’ has been received, exposing the shifts from the philosophical-political dimension to ideological rejection. Secondly, a relationship is established between the interpretative framework of the Radical Enlightenment and the materialist and immanentist foundations of Spinoza's philosophy. It ends with the relationship between Dussel's concept of ‘transmodernity’ and the reception of Spinoza's philosophy in Latin America as an affirmative encounter, as well as the theoretical-political effects that his thought produces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Braulio Rojas Castro, Universidad de Playa Ancha

    Professor, Departamento de Artes Integradas, Universidad de Playa Ancha, Chile

References

Bordieu, P.; Wacqant, L. (2001). Las argucias de la razón imperialista. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.

Casini, P. (2006). “Spinoza, il materialismo e i radicali liberi”. Rivista di filosofia 97.3: 387-408. Doi: 10.1413/23133

Chaui, M. (2011). Spinoza y la política. Buenos Aires: Gorla.

Israel, J. (2002). Radical enlightenment: Philosophy and the making of modernity 1650-1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Israel, J. (2006). Enlightenment contested: Philosophy, modernity, and the emancipation of man 1670-1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Israel, J. (2013). Democratic enlightenment: philosophy, revolution, and human rights 1750-1790. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jacob, Margaret C. (1981). The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans. Crown’s Nest: Allen & Unwin.

Lavaert, Sonja. (2014). “Radical enlightenment, enlightened subversion, and Spinoza”. Philosophica 89: 49-102. https://www.philosophica.

ugent.be/article/id/82127/download/pdf/

Lilti, Antoine. (2009). “Comment écrit-on l’histoire intellectuelle des Lumières? Spinozisme, radicalisme et philosophie”. Annales HSS, 1:171-

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0395264900028614

Nadler, Steven. (2004). Spinoza. Madrid: Acento Editorial. Negri, Antonio. (2011). Spinoza y nosotros. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

Nadler, Steven. (2008). Descartes político o de la razonable ideología. Madrid: Akal.

Nesbitt, Nick. (2008). The Haitian Revolution and the Radical Enlightenment. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

Rojas Castro, Braulio. (2023). “Marilena Chaui, una filósofa política e intelectual participante frente a la crisis del totalitarismo neoliberal”.

Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas, 26.1: 67-75. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5209/rpub.81414

Spinoza, Baruj. (2000). Etica demonstrada según el orden geometrico. Trad. Atilano Dominguez. Madrid: Trotta.

Zuñiga, Jorge. (2022). Enrique Dussel. Retratos de una filosofía de la liberación. Madrid: Herder.

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Castro, B. R. (2025). On the spinozist source of the radical Enlightenment and its conflicting latin american traces. Cadernos Espinosanos, 52, 15-29. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-9012.espinosa.2025.238416