Introduction to the excerpts of Marx on James Mill (1844): on recognition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v21i1p93-98Keywords:
Marx, Hegel, Honneth, recognition, alienationAbstract
The article presents and justifies briefly the translation of the “Comments on James Mill, ‘Éléments d’économie politique’”, written by Karl Marx at the time of the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts (1844). Besides exploring the themes treated in the Manuscripts, Marx addresses the theme of recognition as elaborated by Hegel in an unique way along the corpus of his work, conceiving the relations inside the civil society as conflictual relations of recognition. The notes have thus implications to the interpretation of Marx as well as a contribution to the contemporary theory of recognition.
Downloads
References
Brudney, D. (1998). Marx attempt to leave Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
___________. (2010). “Producing for others”. In: Schmidt Am Busch, H.-C.; Zurn, C. (eds.). The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Lanham: Lexington Books, pp.151–188.
___________. (2014). “The young Marx and the middle-aged Rawls”. In: Mandle, J.; Reidy, D. (eds.). A Companion to Rawls. Chicester: Wiley Blackwell, pp.450-471.
Chitty, A. (2013). Recognition and Property in Hegel and the Early Marx. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16 (4), pp.685-697.
Habermas, J. (2014). Conhecimento e interesse. Tradução de Luiz Repa. São Paulo: UNESP.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1989). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (=Werke Band 7). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Honneth, A. (2003). “Redistribution as Recognition: A Response to Nancy Fraser”. In: Fraser, N.; Honneth, A. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London; New York: Verso.
___________. (2009). Luta por reconhecimento: a gramática moral dos conflitos sociais. 2ª ed. Tradução de Luiz Repa. São Paulo: Editora 34.
___________. (2011). Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlim: Surhkamp.
Marx, K. (2009). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte. Kommentar von Michael Quante. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
___________. (2013). O Capital: Crítica da Economia Política. Livro I. Tradução de Rubens Enderle. São Paulo: Boitempo.
Quante, M. (2009). “Kommentar”. In: Marx, K. Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte. Kommentar von Michael Quante. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp.209-411.
___________. (2011). “Recognition as the Social Grammar of Species Being in Marx”. In: Ikäheimo, H.; Laitinen, A. (eds.). Recognition and Social Ontology. Leiden: Brill, pp.211-238.
___________. (2013). Recognition in Capital. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16 (4), pp.713-727.
Renault, E. (2013). Three Marxian Approaches to Recognition. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16(4), pp.699-711.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Information and conceptions on the texts are complete responsibility of the authors.
All the articles submitted before July 5th 2018 and those published after July 2021 are licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND license – except those published between the aforementioned dates, which are under the CC BY-NC-SA license. The permission for the translation of the material published under the license CC BY-NC-ND by third parts can be obtained with the consent of the author.
Open access policies - Diadorim
Rules applied before July 5th 2018:
Presenting a submission to our Editorial Board implies granting priority of publication for “Cadernos de filosofia alemã”, as well as transferring the copyright of texts (once published), which will be reproduced only with the manifest authorization of the editors. Authors keep the right to reuse the texts published in future editions of their work, without paying any fees to "Cadernos”. We will not grant the permission to re-edit or translate the texts for third parts without agreement of the author.
