Transcendental Illusion and its mechanism in general in the Critique of Pure Reason
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v28i1p25-42Keywords:
Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, Transcendental Dialetic, Transcendental illusion, Principles of reasonAbstract
In this article, we have retraced the main moments of the Kantian analysis in the Transcendental Dialectic of the Critique of Pure Reason on the intrinsic relationship between the transcendental illusion and rational principles. Kant briefly treats the passage between the maxim of logic and the transcendental principle, which is of great importance for the characterization of the general mechanism of the transcendental illusion. After analyzing this passage in detail, we will then bring the interpretation of Grier (2001) on the transcendental illusion and the possible consequences of the Longuenesse (2003)’s critique of this interpretation.
Downloads
References
Allison, H. E. (2004). Kant’s transcendental idealism. 2a. ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Esteves, J. (2012). A ilusão transcendental. In: Comentários às obras de Kant: Crítica da razão pura (pp. 489-560). Joel Thiago Klein (Org.). Florianópolis: NEFIPO.
Grier, M. (1993). Illusion and Fallacy in Kant’s First Paralogism. Kant Studien, 83, 257– 282.
Grier, M. (2001). Kant’s doctrine of transcendental illusion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2012). Crítica da razão pura. Tradução e notas de Fernando Costa Mattos. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes; Bragança Paulista, SP: Editora Universitária São Francisco.
Kant, I. (2010). Crítica da razão pura. Tradução de Manuela Pinto dos Santos e Alexandre Fradique Morujão. 7a. Edição. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbekian.
Kant, I. (1998). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Kant, I. (1992). Lógica. Editado por Gottlob Benjamin Jäsche. Tradução de Guido Antônio de Almeida. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro.
Kant, I. (1992). The Vienna logic. In: Lectures on logic (pp. 251-377). Tradução de J. Michael Young. New York: Cambrigde University Press.
Longuenesse, B. (1998a). Kant and the capacity to judge: sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the Critique of pure reason. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Longuenesse, B. (1998b). The divisions of the transcendental logic and the leading thread. In: Immanuel Kant: Kritik der reinen Vernunft (pp. 131-158). Berlim: Akademie Verlag.
Longuenesse, B. (2003). Book reviews: Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion, by Michelle Grier. Mind: A quarterly review of philosophy, 112 (448), 718-724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/112.448.718
Longuenesse, B. (2020). Kant e o poder de julgar. Tradução de João Geraldo Martins da Cunha e Luciano Codato. Campinas: Editora Unicamp.
Proops, I. (2010). Kant’s First Paralogism. Philosophical Review, 119(4), pp. 449- 495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2010-011
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Patrícia Fernandes da Cruz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Information and conceptions on the texts are complete responsibility of the authors.
All the articles submitted before July 5th 2018 and those published after July 2021 are licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND license – except those published between the aforementioned dates, which are under the CC BY-NC-SA license. The permission for the translation of the material published under the license CC BY-NC-ND by third parts can be obtained with the consent of the author.
Open access policies - Diadorim
Rules applied before July 5th 2018:
Presenting a submission to our Editorial Board implies granting priority of publication for “Cadernos de filosofia alemã”, as well as transferring the copyright of texts (once published), which will be reproduced only with the manifest authorization of the editors. Authors keep the right to reuse the texts published in future editions of their work, without paying any fees to "Cadernos”. We will not grant the permission to re-edit or translate the texts for third parts without agreement of the author.
