Truth and falsehood for non-representationalists: Gorgias on the normativity of language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v11i2p1-21Palavras-chave:
normativity, Gorgias, Encomium of Helen, Defense of Palamedes, rhetoric, sophistsResumo
Sophists and rhetoricians like Gorgias are often accused of disregarding truth and rationality: their speeches seem to aim only at effective persuasion, and be constrained by nothing but persuasiveness itself. In his extant texts Gorgias claims that language does not represent external objects or communicate internal states, but merely generates behavioural responses in people. It has been argued that this perspective erodes the possibility of rationally assessing speeches by making persuasiveness the only norm, and persuasive power the only virtue, of speech. Against this view, I show how Gorgias’ texts support a robust normativity of language that goes well beyond persuasion while remaining non-representational. Gorgias’ claims that a speech can be persuasive and false, or true and unpersuasive, reveal pragmatic, epistemic, and agonistic constraints on the validity of speech that are neither representational nor reducible to sheer persuasiveness.
Downloads
Referências
Barney, R. 2006. “The Sophistic Movement”. In A Companion to Ancient Philosophy (ed. Gill, M. L. & Pellegrin, P.). Blackwell. 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305845.ch5
Consigny, S. P. 2001. Gorgias, Sophist and Artist. University of South Carolina Press.
Coulter, J. A. 1964. “The Relation of the Apology of Socrates to Gorgias’ Defense of Palamedes and Plato’s Critique of Gorgianic Rhetoric.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 68: 269–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/310807
Diels, H. & Kranz, W. 1906. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin.
Dillon, J. M. & Gergel, T., eds. 2003. The Greek Sophists. UK.
Dodds, E. R., ed. 1959. Plato: Gorgias. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.
Forero Mora, J. A. 2015. “Sobre el valor de la verdad: una crítica a Richard Rorty.” Ideas y Valores 64: 157-170. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v64n157.39928
Graham, D. W., ed. 2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics. Vol. 2. Cambridge.
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971. The sophists. Cambridge.
Kerferd, G. B. 1981. The sophistic movement. Cambridge.
McComiskey, B. (1997). “Gorgias and the art of rhetoric: Toward a holistic reading of the extant Gorgianic fragments.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 27:4, 5--24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773949709391103
Melero Bellido, A. 1996. Sofistas: testimonios y fragmentos. Madrid.
Misak, C. 2013. “Rorty, Pragmatism, and Analytic Philosophy.” Humanities 2:3, 369–383. https://doi.org/10.3390/h2030369
Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1987. “Gorgias on the Function of Language.” Philosophical Topics 15: 135-170. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics19871527
Robinson, J. M. 1973. “On Gorgias”, in Exegesis and Argument, Studies in Greek Philosophy presented to Gregory Vlastos, eds. E.N.Lee, A.P.D. Mourelatos and R.M.Rorty, Phronesis suppl. 1, Assen, 49–60.
Rorty, R. 1980. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton.
Rorty, R. 2000a. “Universality and Truth.” Rorty and His Critics. (ed. Robert Brandom). Blackwell. 1-30.
Rorty, R. 2000b. “Response to Jürgen Habermas.” Rorty and His Critics. (ed. Robert Brandom). Blackwell. 56-64.
Segal, C. P. 1962. “Gorgias and the Psychology of the Logos.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 66: 99-155. https://doi.org/10.2307/310738
Spatharas, D. G. 2001. “Patterns of argumentation in Gorgias.” Mnemosyne 54: 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685250152902937
Stoljar, D. & Damnjanovic, N. 2010. “The deflationary theory of truth.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Valiavitcharska, V. 2006. “Correct logos and truth in Gorgias’ Encomium of Helen.” Rhetorica 24, 147–161.
Wardy, R. (1996). The birth of rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato and their successors. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203981962
Williams, M. 2003. “Rorty on Knowledge and Truth”. In Richard Rorty (ed. Guignon, C. B. & Hiley, D. R.). Cambridge University Press, 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511613951.004
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC 4.0) que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).