Aristotle’s Methodology for Natural Science in Physics 1-2: a New Interpretation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v14i2p130-146Palavras-chave:
Aristotle, physics, method, knowledgeResumo
In this essay I will argue for an interpretation of the remarks of Physics 1.1 that both resolves some of the confusion surrounding the precise nature of methodology described there and shows how those remarks at 184a15-25 serve as important programmatic remarks besides, as they help in the structuring of books 1 and 2 of the Physics. I will argue that “what is clearer and more knowable to us” is what Aristotle goes on to describe in 1.2—namely, that nature exists and that natural things change—his basic starting-point for natural science. This, I shall hope to show, is the kind of “immediate” sense datum which Aristotle thinks must be further analyzed in terms of principles (archai) and then causes (aitia) over the course of Physics books 1 and 2 to lead to knowledge about the natural world.[1] Such an analysis arrives at, as I shall show, a definition (horismos) of nature not initially available from the starting-point just mentioned (i.e., it is in need of further analysis), and which is clearer by nature.[2] It is not my aim here to resolve longstanding debates surrounding Aristotle’s original intent in the ordering and composition of the first two books of the Physics, nor how the Physics is meant to fit into the Aristotelian corpus taken as a coherent whole, but rather to show that the first two books of the Physics, as they stand, fit with the picture of methodology for natural science presented to us in 1.1.
[1] An interesting consequence of this, and one which I shall not pursue in this paper at any length, is that the progression from what is clearer to us and what is clearer by nature is by necessity a form of revision: i.e., the Physics should not be seen as a work validating the “starting-point” of 1.2 contra the monists, but a work which gradually builds to the language of matter and form as what is clearer by nature.
[2] Viz., what we find at the beginning of 2.1: “this suggests that nature is a sort of source (arche) and cause (aition) of change and remaining unchanged in that to which it belongs primarily of itself, that is, not by virtue of concurrence” (192b20-22).
Downloads
Referências
Aristotle (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle. Vols. 1 and 2. Princeton: Bollingen.
Aristotle (1983). Physics: Books I and II. Trans. W. Charlton. Oxford: Clarendon, 1983.
Bolton, Robert (1988). “Aristotle’s Method in Natural Science: Physics I.” Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays. Ed. Lindsay Judson. Oxford: Clarendon.
Cleary, John (1994). “Phainomena in Aristotle’s Philosophic Method.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2: 61–97.
Hankinson, R. J. (1995) “Philosophy of Science” and “Science.” The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Ed. Jonathan Barnes. Cambridge: Cambridge.
Irwin, Terence (1988). Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon.
Kelsey, Sean (2003). “Aristotle’s definition of nature.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25: 59-87.
Lennox, James (2008). “‘As if we were investigating snubness’: Aristotle on the prospects for a single science of nature.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35: 149-186.
Owen, G. E. L. (1962/1986) Logic, Science, and Dialectic. London and Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Ross, W. D. (1936) Aristotle’s Physics: A revised text with introduction and commentary. Oxford: Clarendon.
Ross. W.D. (1962) “Philosophy of nature.” Aristotle: A complete exposition of his works and thought. Cleveland: Meridian.
Simplicius (1997). On Aristotle’s Physics 2. Trans. Barrie Fleet. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Themistius (2012). On Aristotle’s Physics 1-3. Trans. Robert B. Todd. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Waterlow, Sarah (1988). Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford: Clarendon.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC 4.0) que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).