The four elements: living beings or inert matter? Plato’s Timaeus against Empedocles’s On nature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v18i2p32-60Palavras-chave:
Empedocles; , Plato, Timaeus, ancient physics, elementsResumo
Abstract. In this paper, I argue that Empedocles’s peculiar expression according to which the roots – living entities, each endowed with thought and desires – “are themselves” forces the reader to think of them not solely as the principles of generation, never born and destined never to perish, but also as the true being, in the sense that the many particular entities are only an aspect, an image, a form assumed by the roots. I then argue that in his Timaeus Plato implicitly opposes Empedocles by describing the four elements as generated, sensible, and corporeal: therefore, not as entities with life and thought or even the true being, but as contingent forms or images of necessity. In this way, Plato prevents Empedocles’s theories from developing into a tradition: no longer conceived as intelligent and living beings, in ancient physics the four elements become inert matter.
Downloads
Referências
Balaudé, Jean-François (2010). Le Savoir-vivre philosophique: Empédocle, Socrate, Platon. Paris: Bernard Grasset.
Baltes, Matthias (1999). “Γέγονεν (Tim. 28b7). Ist die Welt real entstanden oder nicht?”, in: A. Hüffmeier, M.-L., Lakmann, and M. Vorwerk, , eds., ΔΙΑΝΟΗΜΑΤΑ. M. Baltes: Kleine Schriften zu Platon und zum Platonismus, Stuttgart-Leipzig: Teubner, pp. 303-25.
Bastit, Michel (2003). “Du démiurge au premier moteur. Essai autour du démiurge platonicien”, Methexis 16, pp. 23-42.
Brisson, Luc (1998). Le même et l”autre dans la structure ontologique du Timée de Platon (Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.
Brisson, Luc (2003). “À quelles conditions peut-on parler de “matière” dans le Timée de Platon?”, Revue de métaphysique et de morale 37, pp. 5-21.
Broadie, Sara (2011). Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carone, Gabriela R. (2005). Plato’s Cosmology and Its Ethical Dimensions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Casella, Federico (2021). “Platone e il vegetarianismo nel Timeo”, Plato Journal 21, pp. 111-24.
Clay, Jenny S. (1992). “The Education of Perses: From Mega Nēpios to Dion Genos and Back,” in: A. Schiesaro, P. Mitsis, and J.S. Clay, eds., Mega Nēpios: il destinatario nell’epos didascalico, Pisa: Giardini, 23-33.
Clay, Jenny S. (2022). “Hesiod Reads Empedocles”, in: L. Iribarren, and H. Koning, eds., Hesiod and the Beginnings of Greek Philosophy, Leiden-Boston: Brill, pp. 198-217.
Cordero, Nestor L. (2000). “Los atomistas y los celos de Platón”, Methexis 13, pp. 7-16.
Curd, Patricia (2004). The Legacy of Parmenides. Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought, Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.
Curd, Patricia (2016). “Powers, Structure, and Thought in Empedocles”, Rhizomata 4, pp. 55-79.
Duke, E.A. et alii (1995). Platonis Opera 1: tetralogias 1-2, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ferrari, Franco (2003). “Causa paradigmatica e causa efficiente: il ruolo delle idee nel Timeo”, in: C. Natali, and S. Maso, eds., Plato Physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel “Timeo”, Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert, pp. 83-96.
Fronterotta, Francesco (2014). “Modello, copia, ricettacolo: monismo, dualismo o triade dei principi nel Timeo?”, Methexis 27, pp. 95-120.
Fronterotta, Francesco (2021). “Panteles zōion e pantelōs on: vita, anima e movimento intellegibile nel Timeo (e nel Sofista)”, in: C. Jorgenson, F. Karfík, and Š. Špinka, eds., Plato’s Timaeus. Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium Platonicum Pragense, Leiden-Boston: Brill, pp. 49-69.
Gill, Marie L. (1987). “Matter and Flux in Plato’s Timaeus”, Phronesis 32, pp. 34-53.
Gower, Oswald S.L. (2008). “Why Is There an Autobiography in the Phaedo?”, Ancient Philosophy 28, pp. 329-46.
Hershbell, Jackson P. (1970), “Hesiod and Empedocles”, The Classical Journal 65, pp. 145-61.
Hunt, David P. (1998). “The “Problem of Fire”: Referring to Phenomena in Plato’s Timaeus”, Ancient Philosophy 18, pp. 69-80.
Ierodiakonou, Katerina (2005). “Empedocles on Colour and Colour Vision”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29, pp. 1-38.
Iribarren, Leopoldo (2013). “Les peintres d”Empédocle (DK31B23)”, Philosophie Antique 13, pp. 83-115.
Johansen, Thomas K. (2014). Plato’s Natural Philosophy. A Study of the Timaeus-Critias, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Käppel, Lutz (2024). “Themis,” in: H. Cancik, H. Schneider, eds., Brill’s New Pauly, English edition by C.F. Salazar, accessed online March 19, 2024 (doi:10.1163/1574-9347_bnp_e1207510).
Karasmanis, Viktor (2014). “Plato’s Timaeus 31b4-32c4: Why Do We Need Two Bonds between Fire and Earth?”, Philosophical Inquiry 38, pp. 61-68.
Karfík, Filip (2014). “L’âme du monde: Platon, Anaxagore, Empédocle”, Études platoniciennes 11, pp. 1-23.
Kingsley, Peter (1995). Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laks, André, and Most, Glenn W. (2016) Early Greek Philosophy: Western Greek Thinkers. Part 2 (Cambridge-London: Loeb).
Laurent, Jerome (2003). “La beauté du dieu cosmique”, in: J. Laurent, ed., Les dieux de Platon. Actes du colloque organisé à l”Université de Caen Basse-Normandie les 24, 25 et 26 janvier 2002, Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen, pp. 25-40.
Long, Alex (2017). “Immortality in Empedocles”, Apeiron 50, pp. 1-20.
Longrigg, James (1976). “The ‘Roots of All Things’”, Isis 67, pp. 420-38.
Macé, Arnaud (2006). “Activité démiurgique et corrélation des propriétés matérielles. Timée 55e-56b”, Études platoniciennes 2, pp. 97-128.
Menn, Stephen (2010). “On Socrates’ First Objection to the Physicists (Phaedo 95e8-97b7)”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38, pp. 37-68.
Merker, Anne (2006). “Miroir et χώρα dans le Timée de Platon”, Études platoniciennes 2, pp. 79-92.
Mortley, Richard J. (1969). “The Bond of the Cosmos: A Significant Metaphor (Tim. 31c ff.)”, Hermes 97, pp. 372-73.
Motte, André (2003). “Les philosophes préclassiques”, in: A. Motte, C. Rutten, and P. Somville, eds., Philosophie de la forme: eidos, idea, morphè dans la philosophie grecque des origines à Aristote, Louvain: Peeters, pp. 19-63.
Naddaf, Gerard (1992). L’origine et l’évolution du concept grec de phusis, Lewiston-New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.
Naddaf, Gerard (1997). “Plato and the Περὶ Φύσεως Tradition”, in: T. Calvo, and L. Brisson, eds., Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias. Proceedings of the IV Symposium Platonicum, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, pp. 27-36.
O’Brien, Denis (1997). “L’Empédocle de Platon”, Revue des Études Grecques 110, pp. 381-98.
O’Brien, Denis (2003). “Space and Movement: Two Anomalies in the Text of the Timaeus”, in: C. Natali, and S. Maso, eds., Plato Physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel “Timeo”, Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert, pp. 121-49.
O’Brien, Denis (2016). “Empedocles on the Identity of the Elements”, Elenchos 37, pp. 5-32.
Opsomer, Jan, and Roskam, Geert (2003). “Platon, Timée, Critias”, in: A. Motte, C. Rutten, and P. Somville, eds., Philosophie de la forme: eidos, idea, morphè dans la philosophie grecque des origines à Aristote, Louvain: Peeters, pp. 223-48.
Palmer, John (2016). “Elemental Change in Empedocles”, Rhizomata 4, pp. 30-54.
Paparazzo, Ernesto (2015). “It’s a World Made of Triangles: Plato”s Timaeus 53B-55C”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 97, pp. 135-59.
Parry, Richard D. (2002). “The Soul in Laws X and Disorderly Motion in Timaeus”, Ancient Philosophy 22, pp. 289-301.
Pender, Elizabeth (2000). “Plato’s Moving Logos”, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45, pp. 75-107.
Petrucci, Federico (2022). Platone. Timeo. Introduzione di Franco Ferrari, Milano: Mondadori.
Picot, Jean-Claude (2000). “L’Empédocle Magique de P. Kingsley”, Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 18, pp. 25-86.
Picot, Jean-Claude (2017/2018). “Penser le bien et le mal avec Empédocle”, Chôra 15-16, pp. 381-414.
Pradeau, Jean-François (1995). “Être quelque part, occuper une place. ΤΟΠΟΣ et ΧΩΡΑ dans le Timée”, Les Études philosophiques 3, pp. 375-99.
Preite, Alesia (2023). “Does the Universe Perceive? On Cosmic Perception in the Timaeus”, Methexis 35, pp. 108-33.
Pritchard, Paul (1990). “The Meaning of Δύναμις at Timaeus 31c.”, Phronesis 35, pp. 182-93.
Renehan, Robert (1980). “On the Greek Origins of the Concepts of Incorporeality and Immateriality”, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 21, pp. 105-38.
Reynolds, Joshua J. (2008). “How Is the Third Kind in Plato’s Timaeus a Receptacle?”, Ancient Philosophy 28, pp. 87-104.
Robinson, Thomas M. (1979). “The Argument of “Tim.” 27d ff., Phronesis 24, pp. 105-9.
Rowett, Catherine (2016). “Love, Sex and the Gods: Why things have divine names in Empedocles’ poem, and why they come in pairs”, Rhizomata 4, pp. 80-110.
Sedley, David (2009). “Three kinds of Platonic immortality”, in: D. Frede, and B. Reis, eds., Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy, Berlin-New York: De Gruyter, pp. 145-61.
Slings, Simon R. (1991). “Moniē in Empedocles and a Rule of Greek Words Formation”, Mnemosyne 44, pp. 413-15.
Timotin, Andrei (2012). La démonologie platonicienne: histoire de la notion de daimōn de Platon aux derniers neoplatoniciens, Leiden-Boston: Brill.
Torgerson, Tobias P. (2006) “The eidos phos and the Traditional Dichotomy of Divine and Mortal Epistemology”, Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 24, pp. 25-43.
Trépanier, Simon (2003). “Empedocles on the Ultimate Symmetry of the World”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24, pp. 1-57.
Trépanier, Simon (2017). “Empedocles, On Nature 1.273-287. Place, the Elements, and Still No ‘We’”, Mnemosyne 70, pp. 562-84.
Verdenius, Willem J. (1985). A Commentary on Hesiod. Works and Days, vv. 1-382, Leiden: Brill.
Vinel, Nicolas (2003). “Sur les ὄγκοι et les δυνάμεις du Timée 31c5. Contre les interprétations modernes”, Les Études Classiques 71, pp. 51-70.
Zatta, Claudia (2020). “Is Matter Alive? Between Roots and Daemons: Empedocles’ Philosophy of Life”, Civiltà e Religioni 6, pp. 49-72.
Zembaty, Jane S. (1983). “Plato’s Timaeus: Mass Terms, Sortal Terms, and Identity through Time in the Phenomenal World”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13, pp. 101-22.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Federico Casella
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:- Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC 4.0) que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
