Reliability and validity of a load cell device for hand grip strength assessment

Authors

  • Amanda Matias Barbosa Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto. FMUSPRP. Brasil
  • Patrícia Aparecida da Silva Camassuti Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto. FMUSPRP. Brasil
  • Guilherme Tamanini Centro Universitário Claretiano
  • Alexandre Marcio Marcolino Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC. Brasil
  • Rafael Inácio Barbosa Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina – UFSC. Brasil
  • Marisa de Cássia Registro Fonseca Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto. FMUSPRP. Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.590/1809-2950/14143922042015

Abstract

The grip strength is a complex measure influenced by factors such as gender, age, motivation, muscle training, handedness, height, weight, socioeconomic variables, and participation in specific sports or professions. It can be measured by dynamometers or by tension meters such as load cells (strain gauges). Reliability and validity are important psychometric properties, which analyze consistency and applicability of an instruments' measurement. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability and construct validity of a load cell device in isometric grip force measurements using a sample of asymptomatic subjects and patients with wrist and hand dysfunctions. Standardized methods of the upper limb positioning and randomization of the sample order were used. Statistical analysis of reliability was conducted by the ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient) and the construct validity by Pearson correlation coefficient (r), with p<0.05, 95% CI, using SPSS version 20(r). The sample consisted of 24 healthy volunteers with an average age of 22.25 years old, all college students, and 21 volunteers with upper extremity and hand disorders, from both genders. The test-retest reliability for the asymptomatic group was ICC 0.90 (0.78-0.95) and for the group of patients was 0.94 (0.87-0.97), both considered excellent. The Bland and Altman graphics showed that although the reliability has displayed excellent levels and low standard error values of measurement, some discrepant data were found. Pearson correlation coefficients were high, both for the asymptomatic group (r=0.85), and for the patients group (r=0.83). Conclusion: based on these findings, it is suggested that this load cell is a reliable and valid device for isometric grip strength measurement and its use is suitable for future clinical trials and practice.

Downloads

References

Reis MM, Arantes PMM. Medida da força de preensão

manual-validade e confiabilidade do dinamômetro SAEHAN.

Fisioter Pesqui. 2011;18(2):176-18.

Amaral JF, Mancini M, Novo JM. Comparison of three hand

dynamometers in relation to the accuracy and precision of

the measurements. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2012;16(3):216-24.

Caporrino F, Faloppa F, Santos JBG, Réssio C, Soares FHC,

Nakachima LR, Segre NG.Estudo populacional da força de

preensão palmar com dinamômetro Jamar®. Rev Bras Ortop.

;33(2):150-4.

Ferreira A CC, Shimano AC, Mazzer N, Barbieri CH, Elui VMC,

Fonseca MCR. Força de preensão palmar e pinças em indivíduos

sadios entre 6 e 19 anos. Acta Ortop Bras. 2011;19(2):92-7.

Ly LP, Handelsman DJ. Muscle strength and ageing: methodological

aspects of isokinetic dynamometry and androgen administration.

Clin Experim Pharmacol Physiol. 2002;29:39-47.

Fess EE. Functional Tests. In: Skirven TM et al. (Ed.).

Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 6th ed.

Philadelphia: Mosby, 2011.cap 12, p.152-62.

Incel NA, Ceceli E, Durukan PB, Erdem HR, Yorgancioglu

ZR. Grip strength: effect of hand dominance. Singap Med J.

; 43(5): 234-7.

Schlüssel MM, Anjos LA, Kac G. A dinamometria manual

e seu uso na avaliação nutricional. Rev Nutr. 2008;21(2):

-35.

Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability

and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand

Surg. 1984; 9:222-6.

Figueiredo IM, Sampaio RF, Mancini MC, Silva FCM, Souza

MAP. Teste de força de preensão utilizando o dinamômetro

Jamar. Acta Fisiatr. 2007;14(2):104-10.

Abdalla LM, Brandão MCF. Forças de preensão palmar e da

pinça digital In: Sociedade Brasileira de Terapeutas da Mão.

Recomendações para a avaliação do membro superior. São

Paulo: SBTM, 2003. cap.13, p.38-41.

Innes E. Handgrip strength testing: A review of the literature.

Austr Occup Ther J. 1999; 46:120-40.

Stenlund B, Lindeback L, Karlsson D. Significance of house

painters’ work techniques on shoulder muscle strain during

overhead work. Ergonomics. 2002;45(6):455-68.

Irwin CB, Sesto ME. Reliability and validity of the Multiaxis

Profile Dynamometer with younger and older participants. J

Hand Ther. 2010; 23:281-9.

Shechtman O, Hope LM, Sindhu BS. Evaluation of the TorqueVelocity Test of the BTE-Primus as a Measure of Sincerity of

Effort of Grip Strength. J Hand Ther. 2007;20:326-35.

Turgeon TR, MacDermid JC, Roth JH. Reliability of the NK

Dexterity Board. J Hand Ther. 1999;12:7-15.

Kottner J, Gajewski BJ, Streiner DL. Guidelines for reporting

reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed.

Intern J Nursing Stud. 2011;48:661-71.

Dancey C, Reidy J. Statistics Without Maths for Psychology.

Essex, England: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2007.

De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement

in medicine: a practical guide. 4ª ed. New York: Cambridge,

cap 5, p.96- 149, 2011.

Bland JM, ALTMAN DG. Measuring agreement in

method comparison. Stud Stat Meth Med Res.

;8:135-60.

Soares AV, KerscherII C, UhligII L, DomenechIII SC, Borges

Jr NG. Dinamometria de preensão manual como parâmetro

de avaliação funcional do membro superior de pacientes

hemiparéticos por acidente vascular cerebral. Fisioter Pesqui.

;18(4):359-64.

Wimer B, Dong RG, Welcome DE, Warren C, McDowell TW.

Development of a new dynamometer for measuring grip

strength applied on a cylindrical handle. Med Eng Phys.

;31:695-704.

Aldien Y. Welcome D, Rakheja S, Dong R, Boileau P-E.

Contact pressure distribution at hand-handle interface: role

of hand forces and handle size. Intern J Indust Ergon. 2005;

:267-86.

Chourasia AO, Buhr KA, Rabago DP, Kijowski R, Irwin CB.

Effect of Lateral Epicondylosis on Grip Force Development. J

Hand Ther. 2012; 25(1):27-37.

Sodeberg G L, Knustson L M. A guide for use and

interpretation of kinesiologic electromyographic data. 2000.

Phys Ther; 80(5):485-98.

Hintermeister R A, Lange G W, Schultheis J M, Bey

MJ, Hawkins R J. Electromyographic Activity and

Applied Load During Shoulder Rehabilitation Exercises

Using Elastic Resistance. Amer J Sport Med. 1998;

(2):210-20

Published

2015-12-12

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Reliability and validity of a load cell device for hand grip strength assessment . (2015). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 22(4), 378-385. https://doi.org/10.590/1809-2950/14143922042015