Brazilian-Portuguese validation of the Functional Measure for Amputees Questionnaire

Authors

  • Eneida Ritsuko Ono Kageyama FMUSP; Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
  • Mariana Yogi Faculdade de Medicina do ABC
  • Celisa Tiemi Nakagawa Sera USP; FM; Depto. de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional
  • Leda Shizuka Yogi FMUSP; Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
  • André Pedrinelli FMUSP; Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
  • Olavo Pires de Camargo FMUSP; Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-29502008000200009

Keywords:

Amputation^i2^srehabilitat, Questionnaires, Validation studies

Abstract

The aim of this study was to translate into Brazilian-Portuguese and culturally adapt the Functional Measure for Amputees Questionnaire (FMA), also testing its reliability and validity for assessing lower-limb amputees functional capacity. The FMA was translated, back-translated, evaluated by a multidisciplinary committee, and pre-tested. The final version was submitted to field test on a group made up of 44 subjects (39 men and 5 women) with transtibial (N= 27) and transfemoral (N=17) amputation level. The inter- and intra-examiner test showed high reliability; Kappa mean values were higher than 0.80; and in 25% of the items values reached 1.0, thus suggesting excellent examiner agreement. Question 2 (which determines the Locomotor Capabilities Index) internal consistency value found was 0.79, showing consistency as to mobility assessment. The FMA cultural adaptation was satisfactory; a few changes were needed, without altering the original structure or content. Results suggest that the FMA Brazilian-Portuguese version is a reliable instrument to measure functional outcomes of Brazilian lower limb amputees having undergone rehabilitation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2008-01-01

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Brazilian-Portuguese validation of the Functional Measure for Amputees Questionnaire . (2008). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 15(2), 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-29502008000200009