Characteristics of cane-assisted and non-assisted gait in a patient with hip osteoarthrosis

Authors

  • Susane Graup Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Centro de Desportos; Departamento de Educação Física
  • Daniele Detanico Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Centro de Desportos; Departamento de Educação Física
  • Saray Giovana dos Santos Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Centro de Desportos; Departamento de Educação Física
  • Antônio Renato Pereira Moro Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; Centro de Desportos; Departamento de Educação Física

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-29502009000400013

Keywords:

Canes, Gait, Osteoarthritis

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare cane-assisted and non-assisted gait temporal, spatial and spatiotemporal features in a patient with hip osteoarthrosis. The patient studied, with left hip osteoarthrosis, was 63 years old and had 97.8 kg and 1.76 m. A three-dimensional analysis system was used for the analysis of gait. Three complete gait cycles with and without cane assistance were recorded, where temporal, spatial and spatiotemporal variables were analysed. Descriptive statistics was used with the level of significance set at 5%. Main results show that left step length (LSL), right step length (RSL) and stride length were greater during cane-assisted gait; LSL was significantly longer than RSL when the patient used the cane; all temporal variables were statistically lesser in cane-assisted gait; and cadence and walking speed were statistically higher during cane-assisted gait. It may thus be said that use of the cane by the patient with hip osteoarthrosis caused significant differences in spatial, temporal and spatiotemporal variables during gait and significantly improved efficiency of the movement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2009-12-01

Issue

Section

Case Report

How to Cite

Characteristics of cane-assisted and non-assisted gait in a patient with hip osteoarthrosis . (2009). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 16(4), 357-362. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-29502009000400013