The benefits of the anchor system on different parts of the body for posture control in older adults

Authors

  • Jair Araújo Lopes da Silva Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
  • Luciana Oliveira dos Santos Universidade de São Paulo; Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
  • Renato Moraes Universidade de São Paulo; Escola de Educação Física e Esporte de Ribeirão Preto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/15833723042016

Keywords:

Older Adults, Stereotypic Movement Disorder, Postural Balance

Abstract

The anchor system is a nonrigid tool that provides additional haptic information. It consists of two malleable cables with 125g loads resting on the floor, whereas the hands hold the other end of the cable (hand anchor). If we consider that light touch of different parts of the body reduces body sway, it is also possible that the use of the anchor system on different parts of the body might be effective. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the effect of using the anchor system on different parts of the body on older adults’ body sway. Thirty older adults participated in this study. Participants stood on a force platform in a semi-tandem position and maintaining an upright posture for measuring deviations in the location of the center of pressure (CoP). Each participant was exposed to five experimental conditions: no anchor, hand anchor, anchors in hands fastened with straps, anchors in forearms fastened with straps and anchors in shoulders fastened with straps. The results showed a reduction in the area of the ellipse adjusted to the deviation of the CoP and mean sway amplitude in the anteroposterior direction with the anchors positioned on the hands (traditional and strap) and forearms, compared with the condition without the anchor. Thus, the use of the anchor system was effective when the anchors were positioned on the forearm as well as when they were fastened/held in hands. The improvement observed with the use of anchors does not seem to be related to the amount of tactile receptors at the point of contact with the anchor cables.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Siqueira FV, Facchini LA, Silveira DS, Piccini RX, Tomasi

E, Thumé E, et al. Prevalence of falls in elderly in Brazil: a

countrywide analysis. Cad Saúde Pública. 2011;27(9):1819-26.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2011000900015.

Fhon JRS, Rosset I, Freitas CP, Silva AO, Santos JLF,

Rodrigues RAP. Prevalence of falls among frail elderly

adults. Rev Saúde Pública. 2013;47(2):266-73. doi: 10.1590/

S0034-8910.2013047003468.

Moraes R, Mauerberg-deCastro E. O uso de ferramenta

não-rígida reduz a oscilação corporal em indivíduos idosos.

Motriz Rev. Educ. Fís. 2009;15(2):263-72.

Choy NL, Brauer S, Nitz J. Changes in postural stability in

women aged 20 to 80 years. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci.

;58(6):525-30.

Jeka JJ. Light touch contact as a balance aid. Phys Ther.

;77(5):476-87.

Mauerberg-deCastro E, Moraes R, Tavares CP, Figueiredo

GA, Pacheco SCM, Costa TDA. Haptic anchoring and human

postural control. Psychol Neurosci. 2014;7(3):301-18. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2014.045.

Jeka JJ, Lackner JR. Fingertip contact influences human

postural control. Exp Brain Res. 1994;100:495-502.

Baccini M, Rinaldi LA, Federighi G, Vannucchi L, Paci M,

Masotti G. Effectiveness of fingertip light contact in reducing

postural sway in older people. Age Ageing. 2007;36(1):30-5.

Lackner JR, Rabin E, DiZio P. Stabilization of posture by

precision touch of the index finger with rigid and flexible

filaments. Exp Brain Res. 2001;139(4):454-64.

Krishnamoorthy V, Slijper H, Latash ML. Effects of

different types of light touch on postural sway. Exp Brain

Res. 2002;147(1):71-9. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/

s00221-002-1206-6.

Norrsell U, Backlund H, Göthner K. Directional sensibility of

hairy skin and postural control. Exp Brain Res. 2001;141(1):101-

doi: 10.1007/s002210100850.

Mauerberg-deCastro E. Developing an “anchor” system to

enhance postural control. Motor Control. 2004;8(3):339-58.

Mauerberg-deCastro E, Lucena CS, Cuba BW, Boni RC,

Campbell DF, Moraes R. Haptic stabilization of posture in

adults with intellectual disabilities using a nonrigid tool.

Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2010;27(3):208-25.

Mauerberg-deCastro E, Moraes R, Campbell DF. Short-term

effects of the use of non-rigid tools for postural control

by adults with intellectual disabilities. Motor Control.

;16(2):131-43.

Freitas MBZ, Mauerberg-deCastro E, Moraes R. Intermittent

use of an “anchor system” improves postural control in

healthy older adults. Gait Posture. 2013;38(3):433-37. doi:

1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.004.

Costa AA, Manciopi PA, Mauerberg-deCastro E, Moraes R.

Haptic information provided by the “anchor system” reduces

trunk sway acceleration in the frontal plane during tandem

walking in older adults. Neurosci Lett. 2015;609:1-6. doi:

1016/j.neulet.2015.10.004.

Brucki SM, Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PH,

Okamoto IH. Suggestions for utilization of the minimental state examination in Brazil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr.

;61(3-B):777-81.

Maia AC, Rodrigues-de-Paula F, Magalhães LC, Teixeira RLL.

Cross-cultural adaptation and analysis of the psychometric

properties of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test and

MiniBESTest in the elderly and individuals with Parkinson’s

disease: application of the Rasch model. Braz J Phys

Ther. 2013;17(3):195-217. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/

S1413-35552012005000085.

Mazo GZ, Mota J, Benedetti TB, Barros MVG. Validade

concorrente e reprodutibilidade: teste-reteste do

Questionário de Baecke modificado para idosos. Rev Bras

Ativ Fís Saúde. 2001;6(1):5-11.

Duarte M, Freitas SMSF. Revisão sobre posturografia baseada

em plataforma de força para avaliação do equilíbrio. Rev Bras

Fisioter. 2010;14(3):183-92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/

S1413-35552010000300003.

Gardner EP, Johnson KO. Touch. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH,

Jessell TM, Siegelbaum SA, Hudspeth AJ, editors. Principles

of neural science. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2013. p.

-529.

Norman JF, Crabtree CE, Norman HF, Moncrief BK, Herrmann

M, Kapley N. Aging and the visual, haptic, and crossmodal perception of natural object shape. Perception.

;35(10):1383-95.

Norman JF, Kappers AM, Beers AM, Scott AK, Norman

HF, Koenderink JJ. Aging and the haptic perception of 3D

surface shape. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011;73(3):908-18.

doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0053-y.

Carello C, Thuot S, Turvey MT. Aging and the perception of a

racket’s sweet spot. Hum Mov Sci. 2000;19(1):1-20. doi: http://

dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00044-5.

Chang CH, Wade MG, Stoffregen TA, Ho HY. Length perception

by dynamic touch: the effects of aging and experience. J

Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008;63(3):P165-70. doi:

https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/63.3.P165.

Gibson JJ. Observations on active touch. Psychol Rev.

;69:477-91.

Gibson JJ. The senses considered as perceptual systems.

Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1966.

Published

2016-12-12

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

The benefits of the anchor system on different parts of the body for posture control in older adults. (2016). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 23(4), 381-387. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/15833723042016