Intra and inter-rater reliability of the projection of the body’s center of mass obtained via photogrammetry

Authors

  • Ricardo da Silva Alves Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí
  • Isabela Carvalho Pereira Universidade Federal de Alfenas
  • Denise Hollanda Iunes Universidade Federal de Alfenas
  • Carmélia Bomfim Jacó Rocha Universidade Federal de Alfenas (Unifal) – Alfenas (MG), Brasil
  • Simone Botelho Universidade Federal de Alfenas
  • Leonardo César Carvalho Universidade Federal de Alfenas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/15819124042017

Keywords:

Photogrammetry, Postural Balance, Posture, Rehabilitation.

Abstract

For optimal postural control, the center of mass (COM) of the body is a variable that is projected vertically between the legs, over a support base. This study had as aim assessing the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the projection of the COM over the support base, measured with the aid of the Postural Evaluation Software (SAPO). Fifty-seven volunteers were evaluated and all were subjected to photographic records taken from the anterior, left and right lateral views, at the same time. The pictures were handed over to two raters, who then used SAPO to analyze them. For the statistical analysis, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used, and to estimate the minimum detectable change (MDC), the standard error (SE) was used. The results showed excellent levels of inter and intra-rater reliability for asymmetries in the frontal and sagittal planes, and for the projection of the center of gravity in the frontal and lateral planes (ICC>;0.90; 95%CI>;0.95; MDC between 2.16 - 4.87). The results of the study showed that the analysis of the COM obtained with SAPO had good inter- and intra-rater reliability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gangnet N, Pomero V, Dumas R, Skalli W, Vital JM. Variability

of the spine and pelvis location with respect to the gravity

line: a three-dimensional stereoradiographic study using a

force platform. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25(5-6):424-33. doi:

1007/s00276-003-0154-6

McEvoy MP, Grimmer K. Reliability of upright posture

measurements in primary school children. BMC Musculoskelet

Disord. 2005;29:6-35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-35

Bister D, Edler RJ, Tom BDM, Prevost AT. Natural head

posture considerations of reproducibility. Eur J Orthod.

;24(5):457-70. doi: 10.1093/ejo/24.5.457

Iunes DH, Castro FA, Salgado HS, Moura IC, Oliveira AS,

Bevilaqua-Grossi D. Confiabilidade intra e interexaminadores

e repetibilidade da avaliação postural pela fotogrametria.

Rev Bras Fisioter. 2005;9(3):327-34.

Ferreira EA, Duarte M, Maldonado EP, Bersanetti AA.,

Marques AP. Quantitative assessment of postural alignment

in young adults based on photographs of anterior, posterior,

and lateral views. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011;34(6):371-

doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.05.018

Mochizuki L, Amadio AC. Aspectos biomecânicos da postura

ereta: a relação entre o centro de massa e o centro de

pressão. Rev Port Cienc Desp. 2003;3(3):77-83. doi: 10.5628/

rpcd.03.03.77

Viguier M, Dupui P, Montoya R. Posture analysis on young

women before and after 60 days of -6 degrees head down

bed rest (Wise 2005). Gait Posture. 2009;29(2):188-93. doi:

1016/j.gaitpost.2008.08.001

Van Maanen, CJ, Zonnenberg AJ, Elvers JW, Oostendorp RA.

Intra/interrater reliability of measurements on body posture

photographs. Cranio. 1996;14(4):326-31. doi: 10.10180/08869

1996.117445985

Smith, A, O’Sullivan, PB, Straker, L. Classification of sagittal

thoraco-lumbo-pelvic alignment of the adolescent spine

in standing and its relationship to low back pain. Spine.

;33(19):2101-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817ec3b0

Tommaselli AMG, Silva JFC, Hasegawa JK, Galo M, Dal Poz AP.

Fotogrametria: aplicações a curta distância. In: Meneguete

Junior M, Alves N (org.). FCT 40 anos: perfil científicoeducacional. Presidente Prudente: Unesp;1999. p. 147-59.

Sacco ICN, Alibert S, Queiroz BWC, Pripas D, Kieling I,

Kimura AA, et al. Confiabilidade da fotogrametria em

relação à goniometria para avaliação postural de membros

inferiores. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2007;11(5):411-7. doi: 10.1590/

S1413-35552007000500013

Ferreira EAG, Duarte M, Maldonado EP, Burke TN, Marques

AP. Postural assessment software (PAS/SAPO): validation

and reliability. Clinics. 2010;65(7):675-81. doi: 10.1590/

S1807-59322010000700005

Cocchiarella L, Anderson GBJ. Guides to the evaluation

of permanent impairment. Chicago: AMA Press; 2001. p.

-422.

SAPO – Software para Avaliação Postural. BMClab –

Laboratório de Biomecânica e Controle Motor, São Bernardo do Campo [Internet]. [cited 2017 Dez 4]. Available from:

http://demotu.org/sapo/

Duarte M, Freitas SMSF. Revisão sobre posturografia

baseada em plataforma de força para avaliação do

equilíbrio. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010;14(3):183-92. doi: 10.1590/

S1413-35552010000300003

Lexell JE, Downham DY. How to assess the reliability of

measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil.

;84(9):719-23. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000176452.17771.20

Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores

of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther.

;86(5):735-43. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080113

Rosário JL. Photographic analysis of human posture: a

literature review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014:18(1):56-61. doi:

1016/j.jbmt.2013.05.008

Billis EV, Foster NE, Wright CC. Reproducibility and

repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in

locating spinal levels by palpation. Man Ther. 2003;8(4):223-

doi: 10.1016S1356-689X(03)00017-1

Fedorak C, Ashwoth N, Marshall J, Paull H. Reliability of

the visual assessment of cervical and lumbar lordosis: how

good are we? Spine. 2003;28(16):1857-9. doi: 10.1097/01.

BRS.0000083281.48923.BD

Hunt MA, Birmingham TB, Jenkyn TR, Giffin, JR, Jones, IC.

Measures of frontal plane lower limb alignment obtained from

static radiographs and dynamic gait analysis. Gait Posture.

;27(4):635-40. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.08.011

Mündermann A, Dyrby CO, Andriacchi TP. A comparison

of measuring mechanical axis alignment using threedimensional position capture with skin markers and

radiographic measurements in patients with bilateral medial

compartment knee osteoarthritis. Knee. 2008;15(6):480-5.

doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.07.002

Vanwanseele B, Parker D, Coolican M. Frontal knee alignment:

three-dimensional marker positions and clinical assessment.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(2):504-9. doi: 10.1007/

s11999-008-0545-4

Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes

in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of

half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41(5):582-92. doi:

1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C

Souza JA, Pasinato F, Basso D, Corrêa EOR, Silva AMT.

Biofotogrametria confiabilidade das medidas do protocolo

do software para avaliação postural (SAPO). Rev Bras

Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2011;13(4):299-305. doi:

5007/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299

Ferreira EAG. Postura e controle postural: desenvolvimento

e aplicação de método quantitativo de avaliação postural.

[tese de doutorado]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Medicina da

Universidade de São Paulo; 2005.

Bullock-Saxton J: Postural alignment in standing: a

repeatability study. Aust J Physiother. 1993;39(1):25-9. doi:

1016/S0004-9514(14)60466-9

Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human

movement. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2005.

Alves RS, Pereira IC, Rocha CBJ, Pereira SB, Iunes DH,

Carvalho LC. Relação entre a força isométrica dos músculos

da perna e um momento do centro de massa mensurado por

fotogrametria. Saúde. 2015;5(1):9-23.

Perracini MR. Prevenção e manejo de quedas no idoso. In:

Ramos LR, Cendoroglo MS. Guias de Medicina Ambulatorial

e hospitalar da Unifesp: geriatria e gerontologia. São Paulo:

Manole; 2005.

Gribble PA, Hertel J. Effects of lower-extremity muscle fatigue

on postural control. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(4):589-

doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.031

Published

2017-12-12

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Intra and inter-rater reliability of the projection of the body’s center of mass obtained via photogrammetry. (2017). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 24(4), 349-355. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/15819124042017