End-state comfort effect in manipulative motor actions of typical and atypical children: a systematic review

Karina Pereira; Jéssica Cristina Medeiros; Laíce Rodrigues Bernardes; Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza

doi:10.1590/1809-2950/17009426022019

Authors

Karina Pereira Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM) – Uberaba (MG), Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7486-1004
Jéssica Cristina Medeiros Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM) – Uberaba (MG), Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3729-1281
Laíce Rodrigues Bernardes Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM) – Uberaba (MG), Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7442-2685
Luciane Aparecida Pascucci Sande de Souza Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM) – Uberaba (MG), Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7160-9556

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/17009426022019

Keywords:

Child, Motor Planning, Child Development, Teenager

Abstract

This study aimed to make a systematic review of scientific articles on the planning of manual motor actions of typical and atypical children. To do so, a search of articles published between 1996 and 2017 was done on PubMed, LILACS, Science Direct, and SciElo databases. Original articles in English and Portuguese evaluating the planning of motor actions in typical and atypical children performing manual tasks were selected. For the analysis, the population age, number of children, type of task, main results, site of study and impact of the journal were considered. From the eighteen articles found, twelve were about typical children (from nine months old to twenty years old) and six about atypical children (from three to fourteen years old) diagnosed with autism, hemiplegic cerebral palsy, and developmental coordination disorders. In nine- to ten-year-old typical children, the planning ability of manual motor actions develops over the time and is similar to that of an adult. The atypical children showed motor planning ability lower than that of the typical children, and determining the age when this planning ability is acquired was not possible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chapman KM, Weiss DJ, Rosenbaum, DA. Evolutionary roots

of motor planning: the end-state comfort effect in lemurs.

J Comp Psychol. 2010;124(2):229-32. doi: 10.1037/a0018025

Fischman MG, Stodden DF, Lehman DM. The end-state comfort

effect in bimanual grip selection. RQES. 2003;74(1):17-24. doi:

1080/02701367.2003.10609060

Herbort O, Butz MV. The continuous end-state comfort

effect: weighted integration of multiple biases. Psychol Res.

;76(3):345-63. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0334-7

Steenbergen B, Meulenbroek RGJ, Rosenbaum, DA. Constraints

on grip selection in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: effects of lesional

side, end-point accuracy, and context. Brain Res Cogn Brain

Res. 2004;19:145-59. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.11.008

Bernstein N. The co-ordination and regulation of movements.

Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1967.

Rosenbaum DA, Marchak F, Barnes HJ, Vaughan J, Slotta

JD, Jorgensen MJ. Constraints for action selection: overhand

versus underhand grips. In: Jeannerod M, editor. Attention and

performance XIII: motor representation and control. Abingdon:

Psychology Press; 1990. p. 321-42.

Moreira CRP, Manoel EJ. Planejamento na aquisição de

habilidades motoras de manipulação. In: Tani G, editor.

Comportamento motor: aprendizagem e desenvolvimento.

Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2008. p. 251-8.

Adalbjornsson CF, Fischman MG, Rudisill ME. The endstate comfort effect in young children. Res Q Exerc Sport.

;79(1):36-41. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2008.10599458

Stockel T, Hughes C, Schack T. Representation of grasp postures

and anticipatory motor planning in children. Psychol Res.

;76(6):768-76. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0387-7

Thibaut JP, Toussaint L. Developing motor planning over ages. J Exp

Child Psychol. 2010;105(1-2):116-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.003

Scharoun SM, Bryden PJ. The development of end- and

beginning-state comfort in a cup manipulation task.

Dev Psychobiol. 2014;56(3):407-20. doi: 10.1002/dev.21108

Knudsen B, Henning A, Wunsch K, Weigelt M, Aschersleben

G. The end-state comfort effect in 3- to 8-year-old children in

two object manipulation tasks. Front Psychol. 2012;3:1-10. doi:

3389/fpsyg.2012.00445

Manoel EJ, Moreira CRP. Planning manipulative hand movements:

do young children show the end-state comfort effect?

J Hum Mov Stud. 2005;49:93-114.

Sampaio RF, Mancini MC. Estudos de revisão sistemática: um

guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica. Braz J Phys

Ther. 2007;11(1):83-9.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA. Preferred

reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the

PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264-9. doi:

1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Jovanovic B, Schwarzer G. The development of the grasp height

effect as a measure of efficient action planning in children. J Exp

Child Psychol. 2017;153:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.09.002

Jung W, Kahrsb BA, Lockman JJ. Manual action, fitting, and

spatial planning: relating objects by young children. Cognition.

;134:128-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.004

Jongbloed-Pereboom M, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG,

Saraber-Schiphorst N, Crajé C, Steenbergen B. Anticipatory

action planning increases from 3 to 10 years of age in typically

developing children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2013;114(2):295-305.

doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.08.008

Jovanovic B, Schwarzer G. Learning to grasp efficiently:

the development of motor planning and the role of

observational learning. Vision Res. 2011;51:945-54. doi:

1016/j.visres.2010.12.003

Weigelt M, Schack T. The development of end-state comfort

planning in preschool children. J. Exp. Psychol. 2010;57(6):476-782.

doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000059

McCarty ME, Clifton RK, Collard RR. Problem solving in infancy: the

emergence of an action plan. Dev Psychol. 1999;35(4):1091-101.

doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.1091

Hay L, Bard C, Ferrel C, Olivier I, Fleury M. Role of

proprioceptive information in movement programming and

control in 5–11 year-old children. Hum Mov Sci. 2005:24:139-54.

doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.05.002

Adams ILJ, Ferguson GDF, Lust JML, Steenbergen B, SmitsEngelsman BCM. Action planning and position sense in children

with developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci.

;46:196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.01.006

Janssen L, Steenbergen B. Typical and atypical (cerebral palsy)

development of unimanual and bimanual grasp planning. Res

Dev Disabil. 2011;32(3):963-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.002

Crajé C, Aarts P, Nijhuis-van der Sanden M, Steenbergen, B.

Action planning in typically and atypically developing children

(unilateral cerebral palsy). Res Dev Disabil. 2010;31(5):1039-46.

doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.04.007

van Swieten LM, Van Bergen E, Williams JHG, Wilson AD, Plumb

MS, Kent SW, Mon-Williams MA. A test of motor (not executive)

planning in developmental coordination disorder and autism.

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010;36(2):493-9. doi:

1037/a0017177

Smyth MM, Mason UC. Planning and execution of action

in children with and without developmental coordination

disorder. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38(8):1023-37.

doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01619.x

Hughes C. Brief report: planning problems in autism at the

level of motor control. J Autism Dev Disord. 1996;26(1):99-107.

End-state comfort effect in manipulative motor actions of typical and atypical children: a systematic review

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

Downloads

References

Downloads

Published

Issue

Section

License

How to Cite

Keywords

Language

Information