Scientific research with individuals post stroke: difficulties in recruitment, allocation and adherence on two different protocols of physiotherapy intervention

Authors

  • Raquel Pinheiro Gomes Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) – Florianópolis (SC), Brasil
  • Stella Maris Michaelsen Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) – Florianópolis (SC), Brasil
  • Letícia Cardoso Rodrigues Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) – Florianópolis (SC), Brasil
  • Nayara Correa Farias Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) – Florianópolis (SC), Brasil
  • Rudney da Silva Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) – Florianópolis (SC), Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.590/1809-2950/13111022012015

Abstract

This study analyze the difficulties in recruitment, allocation and adherence of individuals with hemiparesis after stroke in the development of two randomized clinical trials (RCTs). For this, data were extracted from two RCTs that investigated patients with hemiparesis due to stroke, living in Florianópolis, aged over 40 years. RCTs interventions were based to task-oriented training and were performed evaluations at three different times (pre, post, follow-up). The sample calculations determined the need of 54 participants for Study I and 36 for Study II. The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative information through the content analysis. It was found that of 127 potential participants, it was not possible to contact 18.1%, and 5.5% came to death. In preselection 6.3% were hospitalized/bedridden, 7% had no interest and 4.7% were unable to transport. During allocation 33% were excluded for not meeting the eligibility criteria. Among 32 patients who remained in the study, 16% missed the Study I and 2.5% the Study II. Wrong contact data, lack of resources for transportation, eligibility criteria and lack of interest were the factors that hindered the recruitment of subjects. Therefore, we suggested that the relations improvement between research centers and institutions, the proper recording of contacts, access to clinical records, the availability of financial resources to support the recruitment and transportation and increased funding for RCTs can improve the viability of this type of study in Brazil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gul RB, Ali PA. Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and

retention of participants. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(1-2):227-33.

Keith SJ. Evaluating characteristics of patient selection and dropout

rates. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(9):11-4.

Blanton S, Morris DM, Prettyman MG, Mcculloch K, Redmond S,

Light KE. Lessons learned in participant recruitment and retention:

the EXCITE trial. Phys Ther. 2006;86(11):1520-33.

Scianni A, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Ada L. Challenges in recruitment, attendance and adherence of acute stroke survivors to a randomized

trial in Brazil: a feasibility study. Braz J PhysTher. 2012;16(1):40-5.

Easterbrook PJ, Matthews DR. Fate of research studies. J R Soc

Med. 1992;85(2):71-6.

Lima LO, Rodrigues-de-Paula F. Recruitment rate, feasibility and

safety of power training in individuals with Parkinson’s disease: a

proof-of-concept study. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013;17(1):49-56.

Weyne GRS. Determinação do tamanho da amostra em pesquisas

experimentais na área de saúde. Arq Med ABC. 2004;29(2):89-90.

Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Cobb S. Touching the

phantom limb. Nature. 1995;377(6549):489-90.

Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70; 2000.

Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de Informática do SUS.

Disponível em: <http://www2.datasus.gov.br/DATASUS/index.

php?area=02>

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Demográfico

Disponível em: <http://cod.ibge.gov.br/1P2>

Ribeiro MCSA, Barata RB, Almeida MF, Silva, ZP. Perfil sociodemográfico e padrão de utilização de serviços de saúde para

usuários e não-usuários do SUS – PNAD 2003. Cien Saude Colet.

;11(4):1011-22.

Lloyd G, Dean CM, Ada L. Issues in recruiting community-dwelling

stroke survivors to clinical trials: the AMBULATE trial. Contemp Clin

Trials. 2010;31(4):289-92.

Duncan PW, Richards L, Wallace D, Stoker-Yates J, Pohl P, Luchies

C, et al. A randomized, controlled pilot study of a home-based exercise program for individuals with mild and moderate stroke. Stroke.

;29(10):2055-60.

Werner RA, Kessler S. Effectiveness of an intensive outpatient rehabilitation program for post acute stroke patients. Am J Phys Med

Rehabil. 1996;75(2):114-20.

Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S, Reker D, Lai SM, Richards L.

Daily functioning and quality of life in a randomized controlled

trial of therapeutic exercise for sub acute stroke survivors. Stroke.

;36(8):1764-70.

Dias L, Schoenfeld E, Thomas J, Baldwin C, Mcleod J, Smith J,

Owens R, Hyman L. Reasons for high retention in pediatric clinical

trials: comparison of participant and staff responses in the correction of myopia evaluation trial. Clin Trials. 2005;2(5):443-52.

Published

2015-03-03

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Scientific research with individuals post stroke: difficulties in recruitment, allocation and adherence on two different protocols of physiotherapy intervention . (2015). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 22(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.590/1809-2950/13111022012015