La intervención parental mejora el desarrollo motor de lactantes de riesgo: estudio de serie de casos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/15828624012017Palabras clave:
Desarrollo Infantil, Factores de Riesgo, Actividad MotoraResumen
Por intermedio de actividades parentales, la intervención precoz en el desarrollo favorece logros cognitivos, físicos, sociales y emocionales a los bebés, factores determinantes para la salud infantil. Pero son pocos los estudios sobre la intervención precoz con actividades parentales. Así en este estudio se propone analizar los resultados de la intervención parental precoz para el desarrollo motor de lactantes en ambulatorio de una maternidad. Estudio de tipo serie de casos, longitudinal e intervencionista, del cual participaron cien lactantes, entre 0 y 18 meses de edad, provenientes del ambulatorio de la maternidad. Se evaluó el desarrollo motor de los lactantes por intermedio de la escala Alberta. Dependiendo del retraso motor observado en los bebés, se hicieron recomendaciones a los padres. No se encontró relaciones entre los factores de riesgo y el desarrollo motor. Sin embargo, estos factores presentaron relación con la edad gestacional, que se relacionó, a su vez, con el desarrollo motor. Tras la intervención precoz parental, la frecuencia del muestreo aumentó del 45% al 69% en el grupo de bebés con desarrollo motor normal. El grupo con retraso en el desarrollo sufrió una disminución en la frecuencia de la muestra del 55% al 31%. Los factores de riesgo prenatal y/o perinatal pueden implicar precocidad y, por consiguiente, retraso en el desarrollo motor infantil. Para lactantes en ambulatorios, estos protocolos de intervención precoz con actividades parentales son eficaces para promocionar su desarrollo motor normal.Descargas
Referencias
Tao S, Tao F. The effects of prenatal environmental
exposures on children development and health. Zhonghua
Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016;50(2):192-7. doi: 10.3760/
cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2016.02.018.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Indicadores e dados básicos
[Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2005. [acesso em
maio]. Disponível em: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br
Thelen E, Ulrich BD. Hidden skills: a dynamic systems analysis
of treadmill stepping during the first year. Monogr Soc Res
Child Dev. 1991;56(1):1-98. doi: 10.2307/1166099.
Walker SP, Wachs TD, Grantham-McGregor S, Black MM,
Nelson CA, Huffman SL, et al. Inequality in early childhood:
risk and protective factors for early child development.
Lancet. 2011;378(9799):1325-38. Doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(11)60555-2.
Woodward LJ, Moor S, Hood KM, Champion PR, Foster-Cohen
S, Inder TE, et al. Very preterm children show impairments
across multiple neurodevelopmental domains by age 4
years. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(5):F339-
doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.146282.
Verkerk G, Jeukens-Visser M, Wassenaer-Leemhuis
A, Kok J, Nollet F. The relationship between multiple
developmental difficulties in very low birth weight children
at 3½ years of age and the need for learning support at
years of age. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(1):185-91. doi:
1016/j.ridd.2013.10.007.
Valla L, Wentzel-Larsen T, Hofoss D, Slinning K. Prevalence
of suspected developmental delays in early infancy: results
from a regional population-based longitudinal study. BMC
Pediatr. 2015;15:215. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0528-z.
Santos RS, Araújo APQC, Porto MAS. Early diagnosis of
abnormal development of preterm newborns: assessment
instruments. J Pediatr (Rio J.). 2008;84(4):289-99. doi:
1590/S0021-75572008000400003.
Pin TW, Eldridge B, Galea MP. Motor trajectories from 4
to 18 months corrected age in infants born at less than 30
weeks of gestation. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(9):573-80. doi:
1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.07.008.
Manacero S, Nunes ML. Evaluation of motor performance
of preterm newborns during the first months of life using
the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). J Pediatr (Rio J.).
;84(1):53-9. doi: 10.1590/S0021-75572008000100010.
Pin TW, de Valle K, Eldridge B, Galea MP. Clinimetric
properties of the alberta infant motor scale in infants born
preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010;22(3):278-86. doi: 10.1097/
PEP.0b013e3181e94481.
Prins SA, Lindern JS, Dijk S, Versteegh FGA. Motor
development of premature infants born between 32
de Sá et al. Intervenção parental em lactentes de risco
and 34 weeks. Int J Pediatr. 2010;Article ID 462048. doi:
1155/2010/462048.
Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the
clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm
infants during the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol.
;50(4):254-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02025.x.
Womack B, Heriza CB. Clinimetric properties of the alberta
infant motor scale in infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther.
;22(3):287.
Piper MC, Pinnell LE, Darrah J, Maguire T, Byrne PJ.
Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale
(AIMS). Can J Public Health. 1992;83(Supp 2):S46-50.
Syrengelas D, Siahanidou T, Kourlaba G, Kleisiouni P,
Bakoula C, Chrousos GP. Standardization of the Alberta
infant motor scale in full-term Greek infants: preliminary
results. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(4):245-9. doi: 10.1016/j.
earlhumdev.2010.03.009.
Spittle AJ, Ferretti C, Anderson PJ, Orton J, Eeles A, Bates L,
et al. Improving the outcome of infants born at <30 weeks’
gestation: a randomized controlled trial of preventative care
at home. BMC Pediatr. 2009;9:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-73.
De Kegel A, Peersman W, Onderbeke K, Baetens T, Dhooge I,
Waelvelde H. New reference values must be established for
the Alberta Infant Motor Scales for accurate identification
of infants at risk for motor developmental delay in
Flanders. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39(2):260-7. doi:
1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01384.x.
Fleuren KMW, Smit LS, Stijnen TH, Hartman A. New
reference values for the Alberta Infant Motor Scale need
to be established. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(3):424-7. doi:
1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00111.x.
Mendonça B, Sargent B, Fetters L. Cross-cultural validity
of standardized motor development screening and
assessment tools: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol.
;58(12):1213-22. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13263.
Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor assessment of the developing
infant. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1994.
Uesugi M, Tokuhisa K, Shimada T. The reliability and validity
of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in Japan. J Phys Ther Sci.
;20(3):169-75. doi: 10.1589/jpts.20.169.
Jeng SF, Yau KIT, Chen LC, Hsiao SF. Alberta Infant Motor Scale:
reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan.
Phys Ther. 2000;80(2):168-78. doi: 10.1093/ptj/80.2.168.
Cardoso MV. Escala Motora Infantil de Alberta/EMIA.
Tradução da Alberta Infant Motor Scale/AIMS para a língua
portuguesa com permissão de editora Elsevier; 2007.
Valentini NC, Saccani R. Escala Motora Infantil de Alberta:
validação para uma população gaúcha. Rev Paul Pediatr.
;29(2):231-8. doi: 10.1590/S0103-05822011000200015.
Valentini NC, Saccani R. Brazilian validation of the Alberta
Infant Motor Scale. Phys Ther. 2012;92(3):440-7. doi: 10.2522/
ptj.20110036.
Almeida KM, Dutra MVP, Mello RR, Reis ABR, Martins PS.
Concurrent validity and reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor
Scale in premature infants. J Pediatr (Rio J.). 2008;84(5):442-
doi: 10.2223/JPED.1836.
Formiga CKMR, Linhares MB. Motor development curve
from 0 to 12 months in infants born preterm. Acta Paediatr.
;100(3):379-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.02002.x.
Herrero D, Gonçalves H, Siqueira AAF, Abreu LC. Escalas
de desenvolvimento motor em lactentes: Test of Infant
Motor Performance e a Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Rev Bras
Crescimento Desenvolv Hum. 2011;21(1):122-32.
Saccani R, Valentine CV. Análise do desenvolvimento motor
de crianças de zero a 18 meses de idade: representatividade
dos itens da Alberta Infant Motor Scale por faixa etária
e postura. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolv Hum.
;20(3):711-22.
Saccani R, Valentini NC. Reference curves for the Brazilian
Alberta Infant Motor Scale: percentiles for clinical description
and follow-up over time. J Pediatr (Rio J.). 2012;88(1):40-7.
doi: 10.2223/JPED.2142.
Saccani R, Valentini NC, Pereira KR. New Brazilian
developmental curves and reference values for the Alberta
infant motor scale. Infant Behav Dev. 2016;45(Pt A):38-46.
doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.09.002.
Blauw-Hospers CH, Hadders-Algra M. A systematic review
of the effects of early intervention on motor development.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(6):421-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-
2005.tb01165.x.
Pritchard MA, Colditz PB, Cartwright D, Gray PH, Tudehope
D, Beller E. Risk determinants in early intervention use during
the first postnatal year in children born very preterm. BMC
Pediatr. 2013;5(13):201. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-201.
Ribeiro ASC, Formiga CKMR, David AC. Healthy preterm
infants: global motor coordination and early intervention.
Fisioter Mov. 2015;28(1):85-95. doi: 10.1590/0103-
028.001.AO09.
Hwang AW, Chao MY, Liu SW. A randomized controlled trial of
routines-based early intervention for children with or at risk
for developmental delay. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(10):3112-
doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.037.
Wang TN, Howe TH, Lin KC, Hsu YW. Hand function and
its prognostic factors of very low birth weight preterm
children up to a corrected age of 24 months. Res Dev Disabil.
;35(2):322-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.11.023.
Kieviet JF, Piek JP, Aarnoudse-Moens CS, Oosterlaan J. Motor
development in very preterm and very low-birth-weight
children from birth to adolescence: a meta-analysis. JAMA.
;302(20):2235-42. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1708.
Moreira RS, Magalhães LC, Alves CRL. Effect of preterm birth
on motor development, behavior, and school performance of
school-age children: a systematic review. J Pediatr (Rio J.).
;90(2):119-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2013.05.010.
Black MM, Hurley KM. Early child development programmes:
further evidence for action. Lancet Glob Health.
;4(8):e505-6. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30149-8.
Yousafzai AK, Obradović J, Rasheed MA, Rizvi A, Portilla XA,
Tirado-Strayer N, et al. Effects of responsive stimulation and
nutrition interventions on children’s development and growth
at age 4 years in a disadvantaged population in Pakistan:
a longitudinal follow-up of a cluster-randomised factorial
effectiveness trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(8):e548-58.
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30100-0.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2017 Fisioterapia e Pesquisa
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.