Escala de autoimagen genital femenina (FGSIS): punto de corte, confiabilidad y validación de las propiedades de medición para mujeres brasileñas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/e22015823enPalabras clave:
Imagen Corporal, Sexualidad, Estudio de Validación, MujeresResumen
El objetivo de este estudio fue traducir, crear
un punto de corte y evaluar las propiedades de medición de
la escala de autoimagen genital femenina (FGSIS – female
genital self-image scale) para mujeres brasileñas. En este
estudio se evaluaron, en línea, la validez de contenido,
estructural y de construcción, la consistencia interna,
la confiabilidad test-retest y los errores de medición.
El punto de corte del FGSIS para clasificar la satisfacción
con la autoimagen genital se realizó mediante el modelo de crédito parcial. En el estudio participaron 614 mujeres
(28,92±9,80 años). El FGSIS mostró una estructura unifactorial y
adecuadas propiedades de medición. FGSIS≥22 puntos clasifica
a las mujeres como satisfechas con su autoimagen genital.
Se concluye que el FGSIS es una medida sencilla, válida y confiable
para evaluar la autoimagen genital de mujeres brasileña
Descargas
Referencias
Berman L, Berman J, Miles M, Pollets D, Powell JA. Genital self-image as a component of sexual health: relationship between genital self-image, female sexual function, and quality of life measures. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003;29(Suppl 1):11-21. doi: 10.1080/713847124.
DeMaria AL, Hollub AV, Herbenick D. Using genital self-image, body image, and sexual behaviors to predict gynecological exam behaviors of college women. J Sex Med. 2011;8(9):2484-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02379.x.
Herbenick D, Schick V, Reece M, Sanders S, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. The Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS): results from a nationally representative probability sample of women in the United States. J Sex Med. 2011;8(1):158-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02071.x.
Herbenick D, Reece M. Development and validation of the Female Genital Self-Image Scale. J Sex Med. 2010;7(5):1822-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01728.x.
Lordelo P, Brasil C, Lerche J, Gomes T, Martins P, Castro M. Relationship between female genital self-image and sexual function: cross-sectional study. Obstet Gynecol Int J. 2017;7(4):00253. doi: 10.15406/ogij.2017.07.00253.
International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. ISAPS international survey on aesthetic/cosmetic procedures performed in 2019. West Lebanon: ISAPS; 2020.
Ellibes Kaya A, Yassa M, Dogan O, Basbug A, Pulatoglu C, Caliskan E. The Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS): cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychometric properties within a Turkish population. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(1):89-99. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3688-1.
Mohammed GFAE, Hassan H. Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the female genital self-image scale. J Sex Med. 2014;11(5):1193-200. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12494.
Pakpour AH, Zeidi IM, Ziaeiha M, Burri A. Cross-cultural adaptation of the female genital self-image scale (FGSIS) in Iranian female college students. J Sex Res. 2014;51(6):646-53. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.821441.
Felix GAA, Nahas FX, Marcondes GB, Santos AG, Brito MJA, Ferreira LM. Brazilian Portuguese version of the Female Genital Self Image Scale (FGSIS) for women seeking abdominoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(12):1786-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.07.007.
Arruda GT, Silva EV, Braz MM. Male Genital Self-Image Scale (MGSIS): cutoff point, cultural adaptation and validation of measurement properties in Brazilian men. J Sex Med. 2021;18(10):1759-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.07.016.
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Bouter LM, Vet HCW, Terwee CB. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health
Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20(2):105-13. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143.
Amorim H, Brasil C, Gomes T, Correia L, Martins P, Lordelo P. Relação do tipo e número de parto na função sexual e autoimagem genital feminina: um estudo observacional. Rev Pesqui Fisioter. 2015;5(1):49-56. doi: 10.17267/2238-2704rpf.v5i1.571.
Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(8):2197-218. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4.
De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine – a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191-208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597.
Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005;31(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/00926230590475206.
Thiel RRC, Dambros M, Palma PCR, Thiel M, Riccetto CLZ, Ramos MF. Tradução para português, adaptação cultural e validação do Female Sexual Function Index. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2008;30(10):504-10. doi: 10.1590/S0100-72032008001000005.
Junqueira ACP, Laus MF, Almeida SS, Costa TMB, Todd J, Swami V. Translation and validation of a Brazilian Portuguese
version of the Body Appreciation Scale-2 in Brazilian adults. Body Image. 2019;31:160-70. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.10.002.
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53-5. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284-90. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135-60. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge; 1988.
Masters GN. A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47:149-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02296272.
Silva Gomes TB, Brasil CA, Barreto APP, Ferreira RS, Berghmans B, Lordelo P. Female genital image: is there a relationship with body image? Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;16(2):84-90. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2019.49799.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua: Educação 2019. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2020.
Fitch MI, Beaudoin G, Johnson B. Challenges having conversations about sexuality in ambulatory settings: Part I —Patient perspectives. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2013;23(1):4-10. doi: 10.5737/1181912x231410.
Montejo AL. Sexuality and mental health: the need for mutual development and research. J Clin Med. 2019;8(11):1794. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111794.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Guilherme Tavares de Arruda, Erisvan Vieira da Silva, Paula Somavilla, Maria Clara Rocha de Oliveira, Melissa Medeiros Braz
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
