Estrutura conceitual do integrated project delivery (IPD): princípios, catalisadores e proposições

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/gtp.v16i2.167263

Resumo

Ao longo dos anos, pesquisas têm enfatizado a necessidade de adoção de alternativas da gestão de empreendimentos, como forma de superar os problemas vinculados aos métodos de contratação tradicionais. Métodos de contratação, como o Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) vêm ganhando interesse no setor da construção civil. Apesar do potencial do IPD, a introdução deste método na indústria da construção civil é desafiadora e se encontra em estágios iniciais. Os limites de conhecimento do IPD, até o momento, têm dificultado a sua aplicação em ambientes de produção de empreendimentos com pouca experiência sobre esta prática. Assim, considerando a necessidade de expandir o conhecimento sobre o tema, esta pesquisa objetiva analisar e sintetizar a informação relacionada ao IPD, identificar as associações entre os seus elementos e desenvolver proposições que orientam a sua aplicação. Como método de pesquisa, considerou-se a abordagem qualitativa exploratória, com pesquisa de associação, sem interferência entre as variáveis. Foi também proposto o desenvolvimento de um mapa conceitual para compreensão da teoria. Os resultados da pesquisa apresentam a disposição dos elementos do IPD no processo de produção do empreendimento, quer seja no contexto contratual, operacional, organizacional e gerencial. As proposições reúnem informações sobre os benefícios possíveis de serem alcançados com a efetivação dos elementos do IPD.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Integrated Project Delivery; Integração; Colaboração; Acordo multipartes; Gestão de empreendimentos

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

ABDIRAD, H.; DOSSICK, C. S. Restructuration of architectural practice in integrated project delivery (IPD): two case studies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, v. 26, n. 1, p. 104–117, 2019. DOI 10.1108/ECAM-05-2018-0196.

AIA. Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide. AIA California Council, 2007a. Disponível em: aiacontracts.org

AIA. Integrated Project Delivery: A Working Definition. AIA California Council, 2007b. Disponível em: aiacc

AIA; NASFA; COAA; APPA; AGC. Integrated project delivery - IPD for Public and Private Owners: A joint effort of NASFA, COAA, APPA. Lexington, KY, 40, 2010. Disponível em: agc.org.

AIA, C. C.; AGC, A. Draft Primer on Project Delivery. AIA and AGC of America, v. 2, p. 15, 2011. Disponível em: agc.org

AIA. IPD Case Studies. School of Architecture University of Minnesota, 2012. Disponível em: agc.org

AL AHBABI, M. S. Process protocol for the implementation of integrated project delivery in the UAE: A client perspective. Ph.D. Thesis-Salford, UK: University of Salford, 2014. Disponível em: Salford

ALARCÓN, L. F.; MESA, H.; HOWELL, G. Characterization of Lean Project Delivery. In: 21TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR LEAN CONSTRUCTION, 2013. Disponível em: IGLC

ASHCRAFT Jr. H. W. The Transformation of Project Delivery. The Construction Lawyer, v. 34, n. 4, p. 35-58, 2014. Disponível em: amercanbar.org

AZIZ, R. F.; HAFEZ, S. M. Applying lean thinking in construction and performance improvement. Alexandria Engineering Journal, v. 52, n.4, p. 679–695, 2013. DOI 10.1016/j.aej.2013.04.008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2013.04.008

AZHAR, N.; KANG, Y.; AHMAD, I. U. Factors Influencing Integrated Project Delivery in Publicly Owned Construction Projects: An Information Modelling Perspective. Procedia Engineering, Fourth International Symposium on Infrastructure Engineering in Developing Countries, IEDC 2013. v. 77, p. 213–221, 2014. DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.07.019.

BIGELOW, D. B.D. B.; ESCAMILLA E., LOCKWOOD, C. Comparison of Construction Manager at Risk and Integrated Project Delivery Performance on Healthcare Projects: A Comparative Case Study. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, v.11, n.1, p. 40-53, 2015. DOI 10.1080/15578771.2013.872734. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2013.872734

CARVALHO, DE S. R. P.; PAULA, D.; FORTES VITOR, A.; BARICHELLO, E.; VILLAR, R. L. A.; PEREIRA-SANTOS, V. E.; FERREIRA-JUNIOR, M. A. Using Concept Maps: Results with Different Teaching and Learning Methods. Aquichán, v. 16, n. 3, 382–391, 2016. DOI 10.5294/aqui.2016.16.3.9. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.5294/aqui.2016.16.3.9

CHOI, J. et al. Team Integration and Owner Satisfaction: Comparing Integrated Project Delivery with Construction Management at Risk in Health Care Projects. Journal of Management in Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), v. 35, n. 1, 2019. DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000654.

DARRINGTON, J.; DUNNE, D.; LICHTIG, W. Organization, Operating System, and Commercial Terms. Managing Integrated Project Delivery. CMAA, McLean, Virginia, p. 10-47, 2009. Disponível em: leanconstruction.org

DE MARCO, A.; KARZOUNA, A. Assessing the benefits of the integrated project delivery method: A survey of expert opinions. In: PROCEDIA COMPUTER SCIENCE 2018, Anais: Elsevier B.V., 2018. p. 823–828. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.107.

DIAS, C. A. Grupo Focal: técnica de coleta de dados em pesquisas qualitativas. Revista informação sociedade, v.10, n.2, 2000. Disponível em: UFPB

DURDYEV, S.; HOSSEINI, M. R.; MARTEK, I.; ISMAIL, S.; ARASHPOUR, M. Barriers to the use of integrated project delivery (IPD): a quantified model for Malaysia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, v. 27, n. 1, p. 186–204, 2019. DOI 10.1108/ECAM-12-2018-0535

ELY, D. M. Proposta de um modelo para avaliação do processo de concorrência pública de obras ou serviços de engenharia. Tese, Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2016. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/167839

ENGEBØ, A.; LÆDRE, O.; YOUNG, B.; LARSSEN, P. F.; LOHNE, J.; KLAKEGG, O. J. Collaborative project delivery methods: A scoping review. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, v. 26, n. 3, p. 278–303, 2020. DOI 10.3846/jcem.2020.12186.

FERNANDO, C.K., HOSSEINI, M.R., ZAVADSKAS, E.K., PERERA, B. AND RAMEEZDEEN, R. Managing the financial risks affecting construction contractors: implementing hedging in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, v. 21, n. 2, p. 212-224, 2017. DOI 10.3846/1648715X.2017.1301592. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2017.1301592

FIGUEIREDO, N. M. A. D. METODO E METODOLOGIA NA PESQUISA CIENTIFICA. YENDIS, Difusão Editora, 2004, 247 p. ISBN: 9788577280858

FISCHER, M.; REED, D.; KHANZODE, D. A.; ASHCRAFT, H. A Simple Framework for Integrated Project Delivery. In: 22nd ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR LEAN CONSTRUCTION. P.1319-1330, Oslo, Norway, 25-27 Jun 2014. Disponível em: http://iglc.net/Papers/Details/971

FRANZ, B.; LEICHT, R. M. Initiating IPD Concepts on Campus Facilities with a Collaboration Addendum. In: CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2012: CONSTRUCTION CHALLENGES IN A FLAT WORLD. ASCE, 2012. Disponível em: CRC

GARABET, M.; MIRON, C. Conceptual map - Didactic method of constructivist type during the physics lessons. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 2, n.2, p. 3622–3631, 2010. DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.564.

GERHARDT T. E.; SILVEIRA D. T. Métodos de pesquisa. Coordenado pela Universidade Aberta do Brasil – UAB/UFRGS e pelo Curso de Graduação Tecnológica “Planejamento e Gestão para o Desenvolvimento Rural” da SEAD/UFRGS. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS, 2009. ISBN: 9788538600718.

GHASSEMI, R.; BECERIK-GERBER, B. Transitioning to Integrated Project Delivery: Potential Barriers and Lessons Learned. Lean Construction Journal, Lean and Integrated Project Delivery Special issue, p. 32-52, 2011. ISSN 1555-1369. Disponível em: Leanconstruction.org

GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002. ISBN 8522431698.

GOLDENBERG, M. A arte de pesquisar. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 1997. ISBN 8501049654.

HALL, D. Identifying the Role of the Project Intergration Strategies in the Adoption of Systemic Innovations. In: WORKING PAPER PROCEEDINGS, EPOC. Stanford Sierra Camp, California: 2017. Disponível em: gpc.stanford

HALL, D. M.; SCOTT, W. R. Early Stages in the Institutionalization of Integrated Project Delivery. Project Management Journal, v. 50, n.2, p.128–143, 2019. DOI 10.1177/8756972818819915. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818819915.

HAMZEH, et al. Integrated project delivery as an enabler for collaboration: a Middle East perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, v. 9, n. 3, p. 334–347, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/BEPAM-05-2018-0084.

HOSSEINI, A. et al. Selection Criteria for Delivery Methods for Infrastructure Projects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 226, p. 260–268, 2016. DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.187. Disponível em : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.187

HOSSEINI, M.R.; BANIHASHEMI, S.; MARTEK, I.; GOLIZADEH, H.; GHODOOSI, F. Sustainable delivery of megaprojects in iran: integrated model of contextual factors. Journal of Management in Engineering, v. 34, n. 2, p. 1-12, 2018. DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000587.

IOPPI, V.; FORMOSO, C. T.; ISATTO, E. L. Barriers and opportunities for the implementation of IPD principles and LPDS practices in the management of capital industrial projects in Brazil. Ambiente Construído, v. 15, n. 4, p. 87–104, Dez, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-86212015000400041

JADIDOLESLAMI, S. et al. A practical framework to facilitate constructability implementation using the integrated project delivery approach: a case study. International Journal of Construction Management, 2019. DOI 10.1080/15623599.2019.1686834. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1686834.

KIM, Y.-W.; REZQALLAH, K.; LEE, H. W.; ANGELEY, J. Integrated Project Delivery in Public Projects: Limitations and Opportunity. In: IN: PROC. 24TH ANN. CONF. OF THE INT’L. GROUP FOR LEAN CONSTRUCTION. Boston, MA, USA: IGLC, 2016. Disponível em: http://iglc.net/Papers/Details/1305

KOSKELA, L.; BALLARD, G. Should project management be based on theories of economics or production? Building Research & Information, v. 34, n. 2, p. 154–163, 1 Mar. 2006. DOI 10.1080/09613210500491480. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09613210500491480.

KOVACIC, I.; MÜLLER, C. Challenges for the Implementation of Integrated Design in the Planning Practice. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Selected papers from the 27th IPMA (International Project Management Association), World Congress, Dubrovnik, Croatia, v. 119, p. 529–538, 2014. DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.059. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.059.

KNAPP, S.; LONG, D.; HOWELL, G. The role of the Owner’s Representative on IPD projects. 22nd ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR LEAN CONSTRUCTION: UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING PROJECT BASED PRODUCTION, IGLC 2014, June 25- 27, 2014. https://iglc.net/papers/Details/1075

LAURENT, J.; LEICHT, R. M. Practices for Designing Cross-Functional Teams for Integrated Project Delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, v. 145, n. 3, 2019. DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001605.

LEE, H. W.; ANDERSON, S. M.; KIM, Y-W.; BALLARD, G. Advancing impact of education, training, and professional experience on integrated project delivery. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, v. 19, n. 1, p. 8–14, 2014. DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000190. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000190

LEICHT, R. M.; MOLENAAR, K. R.; MESSNER, J. I.; FRANZ, B. W.; ESMAEILI, B. Maximizing Success in Integrated Projects: An Owner’s Guide. V. 1. The Pennsylvania State University. January, 2016. Disponível em: http://bim.psu.edu/delivery

LIU, M.; GRIFFIS, F. H.; BATES, A. J. Compensation structure and contingency allocation in integrated project delivery. In 120th ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, June 23 - 26, 2013. Disponível em: ASEE

MATTOS, M. P. et al. Building constructivist education networks in pharmaceutical deontology: Education and active devices in the art of teaching. Interface: Communication, Health, Education, v. 24, p. 1–15, 2020. DOI 10.1590/interface.190567. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/interface.190567.

MAXWELL, J. A. Designing a qualitative study. In: Maxwell, J. A. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. 3ª Ed. Ed.: Sage Publishing, Cp. 7, p. 214-253, 2012. DOI 10.4135/9781483348858.n7. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858.n7

MIHIC, M.; SERTIC, J.; ZAVRSKI, I. Integrated Project Delivery as Integration between Solution Development and Solution Implementation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 119, p. 557-565, 2014. DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.062. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.062.

MOLLAOGLU-KORKMAZ, S.; MILLER, V. D.; SUN, W. Assessing key dimensions to effective innovation implementation in interorganizational project teams: An Integrated Project Delivery case. The Engineering Project Organization Journal, v. 4, n. 1, p. 17-30, 2014. DOI 10.1080/21573727.2013.855895. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/21573727.2013.855895

MESA, H. A.; MOLENAAR, K. R.; ALARCÓN, L. F. Exploring performance of the integrated project delivery process on complex building projects. International Journal of Project Management, v. 34, n. 7, p. 1089–1101, 1 out. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.007

MOYLAN, W. A.; ARAFAH, N. Integrated Project Delivery: Complicated Collaboration or Improbable Panacea. PM World Journal, v. 6, n. 7, 2017. Disponível em: PMWJ

MUIANGA, E. A. D. Modelo evolutivo para aplicação do IPD (Integrated Project Delivery) em ambientes de produção de empreendimentos onde há pouca difusão de práticas colaborativas. 2018. 251 p. Tese (doutorado) Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Engenharia Civil, Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Campinas, SP. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/333580

NAWI, M. N. M.; NIFA, F. A. A.; AHMED, V. A review of traditional project procurement towards integrated practice. American-Eurasian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, v. 8, n. 2, p. 65–70, 2014. Disponível em: AEJSA

NOVAK, J. D.; CAÑAS, J. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools - Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Florida, USA, p. 1-36, 2008. Disponível em: https://cmap.ihmc.us/docs/theory-of-concept-maps

OSBURN et al. Integrated project delivery: An Action Guide for Leaders. Charles Pankow Foundation, 2018. Disponível em: http://cm.hive.be.uw.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2018/06/Pankow_IPDGuide.pdf

PARK, J.; KWAK, Y. H. Design-Bid-Build (DBB) vs. Design-Build (DB) in the U.S. public transportation projects: The choice and consequences. International Journal of Project Management, v. 35, n. 3, p. 280–295, Abr. 2017. DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.013

PISHDAD-BOZORGI, P.; BELIVEAU, Y. J. Symbiotic Relationships between Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and Trust. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, v. 12, n. 3, p. 179–192, 2016. DOI 10.1080/15578771.2015.1118170. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2015.1118170

RAHIM, S. A.; NAWI, M. N. M.; NIFA, F. A. A. Integrated project delivery (IPD): a collaborative approach to improve the construction industry. Advanced Science Letter, v. 22, p.1331-1335, 2016. DOI 10.1166/asl.2016.6764. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.6764.

RACHED, F.; HRAOUI, Y.; KARAM, A.; HAMZEH, F. Implementation of IPD in the Middle East and its challenges. In: 22nd ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR LEAN CONSTRUCTION, pp 293-304, Oslo, Norway, 25-27 Jun 2014. Disponível em: http://iglc.net/Papers/Details/1019.

ROY, D.; MALSANE, S.; SAMANTA, P. K. Procedural challenges in interorganizational collaboration for IPD adoption. INDIAN LEAN CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE – ILCC Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, V. 2, P. 299-307, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.ilce.in/pdf/ILCC-2017/proceedings.pdf.

RUIZ-MORENO, L.; SONZOGNO, M. C.; BATISTA, S. H. S.; BATISTA, N. A. Mapa conceitual: ensaiando critérios de análise. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), v. 13, n.3, p. 453-463, 2007. Disponível em: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=251019507012.

SARKAR, D.; MANGROLA, M. Development of lean integrated project delivery model for highway projects. International Journal of Construction Project Management, v. 8, n. 1, p. 25-43, 2016. Disponível em: IJCPM.

SEED, W. R. Integrated Project Delivery Requires a New Project Manager. Presented at the 22nd ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR LEAN CONSTRUCTION. Oslo, Norway, 25-27, p. 1447–1459, Jun 2014. Disponível em: http://iglc.net/Papers/Details/1035.

SELLTIZ, C., JAHODA, M., DEUTSCH, M., COOK, S.W. Métodos de pesquisa nas relações sociais. São Paulo: Herder, 1967.

SOUZA, N. A.; BORUCHOVITCH, E. Conceptual maps: teaching and learning strategies and an evaluative tool. Educação em Revista, v. 26, n. 3, p. 195–217, 2010. DOI 10.1590/S0102-46982010000300010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-46982010000300010.

SØDAL, A.H., LÆDRE, O., SVALESTUEN, F. & LOHNE, J. Early Contractor Involvement: Advantages and Disadvantages for the Design Team. 22nd ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR LEAN CONSTRUCTION. Oslo, Norway, 25-27, p. 519-531, Jun 2014. Disponível em: http://iglc.net/Papers/Details/1003.

SUTTIE, J. B. A. The impacts and effects of Integrated Project Delivery on participating organisations with a focus on organisational culture. In: 21st ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR LEAN CONSTRUCTION 2013, IGLC 2013. Disponível em: http://iglc.net/Papers/Details/952.

TENG, Y.; LI, X.; WU, P.; WANG, X. Using cooperative game theory to determine profit distribution in IPD projects. International Journal of Construction Management, [S. l.], v. 19, n. 1, p. 32–45, 2019. DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2017.1358075. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15623599.2017.1358075.

THOMPSON, R.; OZBEK, M. Utilization of a Co-location Office in conjunction with Integrated Project Delivery. In: 48th ASC ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS. Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK: 2012. Disponível em: http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2012/paper/CPRT183002012.pdf.

VOLPATO, G. L. O método lógico para redação científica. Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação, Informação e Inovação em Saúde, v. 9, n. 1, 31 mar. 2015.

WHANG, S. W.; PARK, K. S.; KIM, S. Critical success factors for implementing integrated construction project delivery. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, v. 26, n. 10, p. 2432–2446, 2019. DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-02-2019-0073.

WØIEN, J. et al. Partnering Elements’ Importance for Success in the Norwegian Construction Industry. Energy Procedia, v. 96, p. 229–240, 2016. DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.130. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.130.

YOSHIMOTO, E. M., YOSHIMOTO, G. M. F., SANTOS, G. J. F. DOS, OLIVEIRA, M. M. Conceptual map, an academic textual genre: a proposal for retextualization of didactic texts on History. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Pedagógicos, v.97, n. 247, p.619–636, 2016. DOI 10.1590/s2176-6681/288136311. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/s2176-6681/288136311.

ZANINELLI, T. Information and communication management as factors that influence the innovation process in the collaborative context. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v. 18, n. 2, p. 39–59, 2013. DOI 10.1590/S1413-99362013000200004. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362013000200004.

ZHANG, L.; HUANG, S.; PENG, Y. Collaboration in Integrated Project Delivery: The Effects of Trust and Formal Contracts. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, v. 30, n. 4, p. 262–273, 2018. DOI 10.1080/10429247.2018.1498259. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10429247.2018.1498259

Downloads

Publicado

12-03-2021

Dados de financiamento

Como Citar

MUIANGA, Elisa Atália Daniel; GRANJA, Ariovaldo Denis. Estrutura conceitual do integrated project delivery (IPD): princípios, catalisadores e proposições. Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos, São Carlos, v. 16, n. 2, p. 173–195, 2021. DOI: 10.11606/gtp.v16i2.167263. Disponível em: https://revistas.usp.br/gestaodeprojetos/article/view/167263.. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2024.