Influence of repositioning guides’ color and usage on precision in tooth color measurement with a clinical spectrophotometer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0348Keywords:
Color, Data accuracy, Tooth discoloration, Tooth bleachingAbstract
Repositioning guides are commonly employed in clinical studies to ensure consistent tooth color measurements. Yet, their influence on measured color remains uncertain. Objective: This study evaluated the impact of repositioning guides’ color and usage on tooth color measurement using a clinical spectrophotometer. Methodology: In total, 18 volunteers participated in this study, in which the color of their upper left central incisor and upper left canine was measured with or without repositioning guides (control). The guides were made from pink, blue, or translucent silicone, as well as an acetate-based bleaching tray. Tooth color was measured in triplicates using a clinical spectrophotometer based on the CIELAB system. The standard deviations of these readings were used to estimate reproducibility, and color differences (ΔE00) between the measurements with guides and the control were calculated. Results: Repositioning guides had a minimal effect on L* values and no effect on b* values. The use of pink silicone increased a* values, whereas blue or translucent silicone reduced them. Irrespective of the evaluated tooth, the lowest ΔE00 values were observed for the translucent silicone and bleaching tray. The usage of guides only affected data variability for the L* color coordinate. Conclusion: Using repositioning guides can significantly impact the precision of tooth color measurement with a clinical spectrophotometer.
Downloads
References
Paravina RD, Johnston WM, Powers JM. New shade guide for evaluation of tooth whitening -colorimetric study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(5):276-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00118_1.x
Paravina RD, Majkic G, Imai FH, Powers JM. Optimization of tooth color and shade guide design. J Prosthodont. 2007;16(4):269-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00189.x
Ruiz-López J, Perez MM, Lucena C, Pulgar R, López-Toruño A, Tejada-Casado M, et al. Visual and instrumental coverage error of two dental shade guides: an in vivo study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(9):5961-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04556-0
Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Perez MM, Della Bona A. Influence of gender on visual shade matching in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(2):E15-23. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12292
Simionato A, Pecho OE, Della Bona A. Efficacy of color discrimination tests used in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(6):865-73. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12673
Melgosa M, Ruiz-López J, Li C, García PA, Della Bona A, Pérez MM. Color inconstancy of natural teeth measured under white light-emitting diode illuminants. Dent Mater. 2020;36(12):1680-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.10.001
Liberato WF, Barreto IC, Costa PP, Almeida CC, Pimentel W, Tiossi R. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: a clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.004
Tabatabaian F, Beyabanaki E, Alirezaei P, Epakchi S. Visual and digital tooth shade selection methods, related effective factors and conditions, and their accuracy and precision: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(8):1084-104. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12816
Czigola A, Róth I, Vitai V, Fehér D, Hermann P, Borbély J. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(8):1166-74. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12810
Rondón LF, Ramírez R, Pecho OE. Comparison of visual shade matching and photographic shade analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(2):374-82. doi: 10.1111/jerd.1288
Villarroel M, Fahl N, Sousa AM, Oliveira OB Jr. Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency and opacity of composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011;23(2):73-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00392.x
Smith RN, Karmo M, Russell J, Brook AH. The variability of the curvature of the labial surface of the upper anterior teeth along the facial axis of the clinical crown. Arch Oral Biol. 2007;52(11):1037-42. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.04.017
Peixoto AC, Vaez SC, Pereira NA, Santana CN, Soares KD, Romão AC, et al. High-concentration carbamide peroxide can reduce the sensitivity caused by in-office tooth bleaching: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20170573. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0573
Rezende M, Chemin K, Vaez SC, Peixoto AC, Rabelo JF, Braga SS, et al. Effect of topical application of dipyrone on dental sensitivity reduction after in-office dental bleaching: a randomized, triple-blind multicenter clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149(5):363-71. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.11.003
Vaez SC, Correia A, Santana TR, Santana M, Peixoto AC, Leal PC, et al. Is a single preliminary session of in-office bleaching beneficial for the effectiveness of at-home tooth bleaching? A randomized controlled clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2019;44(4):E180-9. doi: 10.2341/18-196-C
Kiyuna RC, Martins LM, Hanzen TA, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Silva LM. Comparison of the effect of agitation on whitening and tooth sensitivity of in-office bleaching: a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2021;46(2):143-50. doi: 10.2341/19-233-C
Vochikovski L, Rezende M, Maran BM, Paula J, Machado LB, Kossatz S, et al. Combined bleaching technique versus at-home bleaching-a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Oper Dent. 2022;47(3):247-57. doi: 10.2341/20-283-C
Hemming M, Kwon SR, Qian F. Repeatability in color measurements of a spectrophotometer using different positioning devices. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(12):933-8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1784
Fernández Millán D, Gallas Torreira M, Alonso de la Peña V. Using a repositioning splint to determine reproducibility in the color registers of a dental spectrophotometer. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(1):19-25. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12532
Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S1-9. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12149
Soares KD, Bragança RM, Leal PC, Schneider LF, Faria‐e‐Silva AL. Is it possible to determine the optical properties of resin composites with clinical spectrophotometers? Color Res Appl. 2022;47(3):706-16. doi: 10.1002/col.22757
Luo MR, Cui G, Rigg B. The development of the CIE 2000 colour‐difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl. 2001;26(5):340-50. doi: 10.1002/col.1049
Sharma G, Wu W, Dalal EM. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color Res Appl. 2005;30(1):21:30. doi: 10.1002/col.2007024- Akl MA, Mansour DE, Zheng F. The role of intraoral scanners in the shade matching process: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2023;32(3):196-203. doi: 10.1111/jopr.135
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Applied Oral Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todo o conteúdo do periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição CC-BY.
