Biopsychosocial factors contributing to delayed motor development in children: a longitudinal study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.113787Palavras-chave:
Motor skills. Child development. Social conditions.Resumo
Introduction: Biopsychosocial conditions may influence childhood motor skill acquisition. Objective: To analyse the biopsychosocial profiles of children with delayed motor development. Method: Employ quantitative descriptive research under longitudinal analysis. Seventeen students with motor development classified as lower than expected after two evaluations were investigated. A biopsychosocial questionnaire was applied to analyse risk factors in the form of an interview for the parents, and the Motor Development Scale (MDS) was applied to evaluate subject motor patterns. Results: Biological and environmental risk factors, such as difficulties in school learning and low socioeconomic status may have contributed to delays in motor development. Conclusion: Childhood motor development may be influenced by biological and environmental risk factors such as gestational age at birth, type of birth, family socioeconomic status, and parental education level.
Downloads
Referências
Souza ES, Magalhães LC. Desenvolvimento motor e funcional em crianças nascidas pré-termo e a termo: influência de fatores de risco biológico e ambiental. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2012;30(4);462-70. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-05822012000400002
Santos APM, Rosa Neto F, Pimenta RA. Avaliação das habilidades motoras de crianças participantes de projetos sociais/esportivos. Motricidade. 2013;9(2):50-60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.9(2).2667
Mancini MC, Megale L, Brandão MB, Melo APP, Sampaio RF. Efeito moderador do risco social na relação entre risco biológico e desempenho funcional infantil. Rev Bras Saúde Mater Infant. 2004;4(1):25-34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-38292004000100003
Barreiros JMP, Saraiva L. Determinantes biossociais do desenvolvimento motor infantil numa perspectiva ecológica. Estudos Desenvolvimento Motor Criança. Rio Maior, Portugual: 2008; p.141-50.
Santos S, Dantas L, Oliveira JA. Desenvolvimento motor de crianças, de idosos, e de pessoas com transtorno da coordenação. Rev Paul Educ Fís. 2004; 18(esp):33-44.
Cotrim JR, Lemos AG, Néri Junior JE, Barela JA. Desenvolvimento de habilidades motoras fundamentais em crianças com diferentes contextos escolares. Rev Educ Fís. 2012;22(4):523-33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/reveducfisv22n4p523-533
Souza Neto JC. A aprendizagem na formação do sujeito. Cad Psicopedagogia. 2002;1(2):12-17.
Rosa Neto F. Manual de avaliação motora. 2ª ed. Florianópolis: DIOESC; 2013.
Gilbert IC, Gilbert C, Groth J. Children with preschool minor neurodevelopmental disorders V: neurodevelopmental profiles at age 13. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1989;31(1):14-24.
Losse A, Henderson SE, Elliman D, Hall D, Knight E, Jongmans M. Clumsiness in children: do the grow out of it? A 10-year follow-up study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1991;33(1):55-68.
Cantell MH, Smyth MM, Ahonen T. Clumsiness in adolescence: Educational, motor and social outcomes of motor delay detected at five years. Adapt Phys Act. 1994;11(2):115-29.
Cantell MH, Smyth MM, Ahonen T. Two distinct pathways for developmental coordination disorder: Persistence and resolution. Hum Mov Sci. 2003;22(4/5):413-31.
Coppede AC, Okuda PMM, Capellini SA. Desempenho de escolares com dificuldades de aprendizagem em função motora fina e escrita. J Hum Growth Dev. 2012;22(3):297-306. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.46379
Santos APM, Weiss SLI, Almeida GMF. Avaliação e intervenção no desenvolvimento motor de uma criança com síndrome de Down. Rev Bras Ed Esp. 2010;16(1):19-30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-65382010000100003
Teixeira R, Gimenez R, Oliveira DL, Dantas LEPBT. Dificuldades motoras na infância: prevalência e relações com as condições sociais e econômicas. Science Health. 2010;1(1):25-34.
O’Hare A, Khalid S. The association of abnormal cerebellar function in children with developmental coordination disorder and reading difficulties. Dyslexia. 2002; 8(4):234-48.
Dantas LEBPT, Manoel EJ. Crianças com dificuldades motoras: questões para a conceituação do transtorno do desenvolvimento da coordenação. Movimento. 2009;15(3):293-313.
Cardoso AA, Magalhães LC, Barbosa VM. Desenvolvimento psicomotor em crianças pré-termo e a termo na idade escolar. J Hum Growth Dev. 2011;21(2):210-19.
Ferreira Neto CA. Desenvolvimento da motricidade e as culturas da infância. In: Moreira WW, (Org.). Educação Física: intervenção e conhecimento científico. Piracicaba: UNIMEP; 2004; p.35-50.
Halpern R, Giugliani ERJ, Victora CG, Barros FC, Horta BL. Fatores de risco para suspeita de atraso no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor aos 12 meses de vida. J Pediatria. 2000;76(6):421-8.
Magalhães LC Barbosa VM, Paixão ML, Figueiredo EM, Gontijo APB. Acompanhamento ambulatorial do desenvolvimento de recém-nascidos de alto risco: características da população e incidência de seqüelas funcionais. Rev Paul Pediatr. 1998;16(4):191-6.
Nobre FSS, Coutinho MTC, Valentini NC. A ecologia do desenvolvimento motor de escolares litorâneos do nordeste do Brasil. J Hum Growth Dev. 2014;24(3):263-73. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhdg.88910
Nascimento EMF, Contreira AR, Silva EVA, Souza LP, Beltrame TS. Motor performance and nutritional status in students with attention deficit hiperactivity disorder. J Hum Growth Dev. 2013;23(2):358-64. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.69514
Santos APM, Pimenta RA, Costa ANF, Moura M, Rosa Neto F, Poeta L. Desenvolvimento motor e comportamento sedentário em escolares de 8 a 9 anos. Pediatria Moderna. No prelo, 2015.
Fernani DCGL, Prado MTA, Fell RF, Reis NL, Bofi TC, Ribeiro LB, et al. Motor intervention in children with school learning difficulties. J Hum Growth Dev. 2013; 23(2):209-14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.61301
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
