O médico e o curador: a pedagogia da dádiva de Valentin no universo da saúde
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19853Palavras-chave:
Saúde, Dádiva, Troca simbólica, Moderno, TradicionalResumo
Este artigo tem por objetivo analisar - tendo como base a experiência de Valentin, curandeiro da periferia de Brasília - as tensões contemporâneas entre o moderno e o tradicional, detectadas no universo de trocas entre o saber da biomedicina e o saber tradicional das comunidades populares sobre saúde, tendo como suporte a teoria da dádiva de Marcel Mauss e das trocas simbólicas de Jean Baudrillard.Referências
Mauss M. Ensaio sobre a dádiva. Lisboa : Edições 70; 1988.
Baudrillard J. L’échange symbolique et la mort. Paris : Gallimard; 1976.
Baudrillard J. De la seduction. L’horizon sacrédes apparences. Paris : Galilée; 1979.
Baudrillard J. La transparence du mal. Essai surles phénomènes extrêmes. Paris : Galilée; 1990.
Foucault M. Microfísica do Poder. 3a. ed. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Graal; 1982.
Foucault M. Naissance de la clinique. 4a. ed. Paris: Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France; 1994.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
