Metodologia participativa: algumas questões teorico-metodológicas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.37688Resumo
O presente trabalho apresenta algumas preocupações sobre o método, a participação e os recursos humanos na área da Saúde e Educação dentro de uma moldura teórica com reflexos na prática. Apresenta algumas ideias preliminares sobre fonnas particulares de participação de profissionais e a interdisciplinariedade das equipes técnicas. O autor tem como pano de fundo a situação social global do pais, as anuais políticas sociais e a diminuição da parrcipação do Estado.Referências
Ander-Egg E, Folari R. Trabajo Social e Interdisciplinaridad - Ed. Humanitas, Buenos Aires, 1988.
Cornely SA. Introdução a técnicas de projetos: uma abordagem sistêmica. Escola de Serviço Público, Rio de Janeiro, 1974.
Cornely SA. Planejamento e Participação Comunitária. Ed. Cortez, São Paulo, 2ª ed.,1979.
Cornely SA. Planeamiento tecnocrático versus participativo: diferencia de estilo o desustancia. Serviço Social, (6), Tribuna Libre, Buenos Aires, 1987.
Cornely SA. La interdisciplinaridad en elabordaje ecológico, Revista de la Sociedad Interamericana de Planificacion. (98): Guatemala, abril-junho de 1992.
Leff E. Las ciencias sociales y la formación ambientalista a nivel universitario, Rev Interamericana de Planificacion. (83/84): Guatemala, 1987.
Pinto JB. Participação, rito ou prática de classe. Cadernos de Planejamento Participativo, Unijuí, Rio Grande do Sul,1985.
UNESCO. Universities and Environmental Education, (occasional paper), Paris, 1906.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
