Health: a duty of the state or a family matter? analysis of an experience of families from a popular neighbourhood regarding the health system

Authors

  • Ana Cecília de S. Bastos Universidade Federal da Bahia; ISC
  • Zilma L. S. Velame Universidade Federal da Bahia
  • Anamélia L. S. Franco Projeto AXÉ
  • Ana Emília Teixeira Projeto AXÉ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19787

Keywords:

Health care practices, Therapeutic systems, Family

Abstract

In what ways does an urban family use the resources it has to cope with circumstances related to the health-illness process? Literature suggests that an individual submitted to adverse conditions can use various alternatives to overcome hazards to his/her health. If s/he is not competent to face the problem himself/herself, s/he adopts alternatives involving a lay network of social support. If those alternatives fail, s/he turns to prescriptions of competent professionals. The study focuses on descriptions of ways to cope with events linked with health and illness in daily life, rebuilding the experience of the family in its relationship to the health system. The results suggest: a) the presence of standard behaviors and ideas, shaped by characteristics of the illness situation, that are coordinated with the use of the professional health system; b) the adoption of parallel therapeutic systems, with a continuous evaluation of the given results, the formal system being one of the last chosen resources, except when the family faces accidents or chronic problems; c) the adequacy of medical prescriptions to the reality of family life; d) a re-signification of suffering that lessens the anguish and favors the action; e) the presence of conflicts in the family-health system interface, involving various resources and systems of beliefs and practices.

Downloads

References

Bastos ACS. Modos de partilhar: a criança e o cotidiano da família. Taubaté: Cabral Editora Universitária; 2001.

Sarti CA. A família como espelho. São Paulo: Cortez; 2001.

Sarti CA. Famílias enredadas. In: Acosta AR, Vitale MAF, organizadores. Família: redes, laços e políticas públicas. São Paulo: Cortez: PUC-SP;2005. p. 21-36.

Saraceno C. The concept of family strategy and its application to the family-work complex: some theoretical and methodological problems. In: Boh K, Sgretta G, Sussman MB. editors. Cross-cultural perspectives on families, work and change. Binghamton (NY): Haworth Press; London: EUROSPAN-Haworth; 1989. p. 1-18.

Costa M, Lopez E. Salud comunitária. Barcelona: Martinez Roca; 1986.

Cicchelli-Pugeault C, Cicchelli V. Las teorias sociológicas de la familia. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión; 1998.

Valsiner J. Niches of cultural embedded ness. In: Valsiner J. Comparative study of human cultural development. Madrid: Fundación Infancia y aprendizaje; 2001. p. 75-97.

Goodnow JJ. Differentiating among social contexts: by spatial features, forms of participation, and social contracts. In: Moen P,Elder Jr GH, Lüscher K, editors. Examining lives in context: perspectives on the ecology of human development. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 1995. p.269-302.

Massé R. Culture et santé publique. Montréal: Gaëtan Morin; 1995.

Elder Jr GH. Family transitions, cycles and social change. In: Cowan P, Hetherington M, editors. Family transitions. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001. p. 31-57.

Bastos ACS, Trad LAB. A família enquanto contexto de desenvolvimento humano: implicações para a investigação em saúde. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 1998;2(3):106-15.

Coyne JC, Downey G. Social factors and psychopathology: stress, social support and coping processes. Annu Rev Psychol.1991;42:401-25.

Luthar SS, Zigler E. Vulnerability and competence: a review of research on resilience in childhood. Am J Orthopsychiatric.1991;61(1):6-22.

Cowan PA. Individual and family life transitions: a proposal for a new definition. In: Cowan PA, Hetherington EM, editors. Family transitions. Hilldale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum;1991. p. 3-30.

Kleinman A. Concepts and a model for thecomparison of medical systems as cultural systems. In: Currer C, Stacey M, editors. Concepts of health, illness and disease: a comparative perspective. Lexington: Berg; 1986.p. 29-47.

Ferreira J. O corpo sígnico. In: Alves PC, Minayo MCS, organizadores. Saúde e doença: um olhar antropológico. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz; 1994. p. 101-12.

Helman CG. Cultura, saúde e doença. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1994.

Atkinson SJ. Anthropology in research on the quality of health services. Cad Saúde Pública.1993;9(3):283-99.

Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a validconcept? Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(4):509-16.

Gattinara BC, Ibacache J, Puente CT, Giaconi J, Caprara A. Percepción de la comunidad acercade la calidad de los servicios de salud en los Distritos Norte e Ichilo, Bolivia. Cad Saúde Pública. 1995;11(3):425-38.

Stallard P, Lenton S. How satisfied are parents of pre-school children who have special needs with the services they have received?: a consumer survey. Child Care Health Dev.1992;18(4):197-205.

Trad LAB, Bastos ACS, Santana EM, Nunes MO. Estudo etnográfico da satisfação do usuário do Programa de Saúde da Família (PSF) na Bahia. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2002;7(3):581-89.

Boltanski L. As classes sociais e o corpo. 4ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Graal; 2004.

Downloads

Published

2006-08-01

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2006)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis