Mothers' and fathers' emotional wellbeing and the exercise of the parental role: an empirical investigation

Authors

  • Adriana F. Paes Ribas Universidade Estácio de Sá
  • Rodolfo de Castro Ribas Junior Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  • Andréa Araújo Valente Universidade Estácio de Sá

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19800

Keywords:

parental psychology, emotional wellbeing, mothering, fathering

Abstract

The present investigation had 3 main objectives: 1) to evaluate emotional wellbeing, inferred as levels of time stress (TS) and depression symptoms (DS), in a group of mothers and fathers; 2) to investigate some dimensions of the exercise of the parental role, understood as key components of parenting schemes (for example, self-perception, establishment of positive interactions with the children); and 3) to investigate associations between indicators of parental emotional wellbeing and components of parenting schemes. A total of 51 couples, living in Rio de Janeiro, with different education levels, over 18 years of age, with at least one natural child aged less than 5 years, participated in the study. The mothers and fathers answered questionnaires that evaluated TS, DS, components of parenting schemes, social desirability, and sociodemographic data. The results, compatible with previous studies, indicated that an important proportion of parents in the study presented high levels of time stress and depression symptoms. Several significant associations (p <0.05) between measures of parental emotional wellbeing and dimensions of parenting schemes were identified. For example, significant correlations between TS and DS (r = 0,24); TS and self-perception of the parental role (r = -0,48); DS and self-perception of the parental role (r = -0,45); TS and the parents positive interaction with the children (r = -0,22) were identified. Among other aspects, the results can contribute to a better understanding of the associations between emotional wellbeing and parenting schemes and may provide support for future intervention projects with mothers and fathers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yeung WJ, Linver MR, Brooks-Gunn J. How money matters for young children’s development: parental investment and family processes. Child Dev. 2002;73(6):1861-79.

Oldershaw L. Invest in kids: a national survey of parents of young children [report]. Otawa: Statistics Canada; 2002.

Zuckewich N. Days of our lives: time use and transitions over the life course: work, parenthood, and the experience of time scarcity. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 1998.

Conger RD, Conger KJ, Elder GH, Lorenz FO, Simons FR, Whitbeck LB. A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Dev. 1992;63:526-41.

Frias-Armenta M, McCloskey LA. Determinants of harsh parenting in Mexico. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1998;26(2):129-39.

Cochran M, Niego S. Parenting and social networks. In: Bornstein MH, editor. Handbookof parenting. New Jersey (NJ): Laurence Earlbaum Associates; 1997. p. 393-418.

Bornstein MH, Haynes OM, Azuma H, Galperin CZ, Maital SL, Ogino M, et al. Across-national study of self-evaluations and attributions in parenting: Argentina, Belgium, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, and the United States. Dev Psychol. 1998;34(4):662-76.

Simons RL, Whitbeck LB, Conger RD, Chyi-In W. Intergenerational transmission of harsh parenting. Dev Psychol. 1991;27:159-71.

Weber LND, Viezzer AP, Brandenburg OJ. O uso de palmadas e surras como prática educativa. Estud Psicol (Natal). 2004;9(2):227-37.

Davoli A, Palhares FAB, Corrêa-Filho HR, Dias ALV, Antunes JD, Serpa JF, et al. Prevalência de violência física relatada contra crianças em população deambulatório pediátrico. Cad Saúde Pública. 1994;10(1):92-8.

Caselles CE, Milner JS. Evaluation of child transgressions, disciplinary choices, and expected child compliance and a crying infant condition in physically abused and comparison mothers. Child Abuse Negl. 2000;24(4):477-91.

Azar ST, Nix RL, Makin-Byrd KN. Parenting schemes and the process of change. J Marital Fam Ther.2005;31(1):45-58.

Statistics Canada. Time Crunch Instrument (TCI). Ottawa; 1992.

Radloff L. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385-401.

Gonçalves B, Fagulha T. The Portuguese version of the Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Eur J Psychol Assess. 2004;20(4):339-48.

MacPhee D, Benson JB, Bullock D. Influences on maternal self-perceptions. In: Paper presented at 5th Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies; 1986 April 10-13; Los Angeles(CA).

Ribas Jr RC. Cognições de mães brasileiras acerca da maternidade e do desenvolvimento humano: uma contribuição ao estudo da psicologia parental [tese]. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 2004.

Crowne DP, Marlowe D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol. 1960;24:349-54.

Ribas Jr RC, Seidl de Moura ML, Hutz CS. Adaptação brasileira da Escala de Desejabilidade Social de Marlowe-Crowne. Aval Psicol. 2004;3:83-92.

Hammen C, Shih JH, Brennan PA. Intergenerational transmission of de pression: test of an interpersonal estresse model in acommunity sample. J Consult Clin Psychol.2004;72(3):511-22.

Dodge KA. Developmental psychopathologyin children of depressed mothers. Dev Psychol. 1990;26(1):3-6.

Corral-Verdugo V, Frias-Armenta M, Romero M, Munoz A. Validity of a scale of beliefs regarding the positive effects of punishing children: a study of Mexican mothers. Child Abuse Negl. 1995;19(6):669-79.

Jennings KD, Stagg V, Connors RE. Socialnet works and mothers’ interactions with theirpre school children. Child Dev.1991;62(5):966-78.

Rapoport A, Piccinini CA. Apoio social e experiência da maternidade. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolv Hum. 2006;16(1):85-96.

Downloads

Published

2006-12-01

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 3 (2006)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis