Mothers' cognitions about mothering and human development: a contribution to the study of parental psychology

Authors

  • Rodolfo de Castro Ribas Jr. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  • Maria Lucia Seidl de Moura Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Marc H. Bornstein National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19819

Keywords:

Parental cognitions, Parenting knowledge, Self-perceptions, Causal attributions

Abstract

The present study investigated three types of parental cognitions (parenting knowledge, parents' self-perceptions, causal attributions in parenting) and had three objectives: 1) to enlarge our knowledge about Brazilian mothers' cognitions concerning parenting; 2) to compare findings produced in the present study with findings produced in previous studies; and 3) to investigate associations between mothers' cognitions and between mothers' cognitions and certain sociodemographic variables. Sixty-six primiparous mothers, aged 18 or older, from intact families, living in the city of Rio de Janeiro, participated in the study. Mothers completed Brazilian versions of four instruments (Knowledge of Infant Development Inventory, Self-Perceptions of the Parental Role Instrument, The Parent Attributions Questionnaire, Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale) and a sociodemographic questionnaire. The mothers answered correctly about 63% of the questions of the instrument that evaluated parenting knowledge, indicating that their knowledge about child development can be enlarged. Concerning parental self-perceptions mothers evaluated more positively their satisfaction and investment in the parental role. The mothers tended to evaluate external causes (e.g., child behavior) as more important than the internal ones (e.g., effort) for the success and failure in parental activities. Several associations between mothers' cognitions and between mothers' cognitions and sociodemographic variables (e.g., educational attainment) were identified. The results were, to a great extent, consistent with previous national and international studies and can contribute to our understanding of parental cognitions as a complex system.

References

Bornstein MH. Specificity of mother-infant interaction: the influence of maternal age, employment status, and parenthood status [protocolo de pesquisa 88-CH-32]. Bethesda: NICHD; 2000.

Seidl de Moura ML. Interação mãe-bebê e desenvolvimento infantil: um estudo longitudinal e transcultural [projeto de pesquisa apresentado ao CNPq]. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 1999.

Sigel IE, McGillicuddy De Lisi AV. Parent beliefs are cognitions: the dynamic belief systems model. In: Bornstein MH, editor. Handbook of parenting. 2nd ed. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 2002. v. 3, p. 485-508.

Goodnow JJ. Parents’ knowledge and expectations. In: Bornstein MH, editor. Handbook of parenting. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1995. p. 305-32.

Benasich AA, Brooks-Gunn J. Maternal attitudes and knowledge of child-rearing: associations with family and child outcomes. Child Dev. 1996;67(3):1186-205.

Angelillo I, Ricciardi G, Rossi P, Pantisano P, Langiano E, Pavia M. Mothers and vaccination: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour in Italy. Bull World Health Organ.1999;77:224-9.

Coleman PK, Karraker KH. Self-efficacy and parenting quality: findings and future applications. Dev Rev. 1997;18:47-85.

Bugental DB, Blue J, Cruzcosa M. Perceived control over caregiving outcomes: implications for child abuse. Dev Psychol. 1989;25:532-9.

Stevens JH. Shared knowledge about infants among fathers and mothers. J Genet Psychol. 1988;149:515-25.

Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol. 1989;44:1175-84.

Ruchala P, James DC. Social support, knowledge of infant development, and maternal confidence among adolescent and adult mothers. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1997;26:685-9.

Ribas AFP, Ribas Jr RC, Valente AA. Bem-estar emocional de mães e pais e o exercício do papel parental: uma investigação empírica. Rev Bras Crescimento Desenvolv Hum. 2006;16(3):28-38.

Ribas Jr RC, Seidl de Moura ML, Gomes AAN, Soares ID, Bornstein MH. Socioeconomic status in Brazilian psychological research: validity, measurement, and application. Estud Psicol (Natal). 2003;8:375-83.

Seidl de Moura ML, Ribas Jr RC, Piccinini CA, Bastos ACS, Magalhães CMC, Vieira ML, et al. Conhecimento sobre desenvolvimento infantil em mães primíparas de diferentes centros urbanos do Brasil. Estud Psicol (Natal). 2004;9:421-30.

Rabinovich EP, Coser ACPH, Travaglini D, Esteves EN. A comparative study of naming children from two socioeconomic groups. J Soc Psychol. 1994;134:553-5.

Brito Dias CMS, Tróccoli BT. Lócus de controle materno, satisfação com a vida e relacionamento com o filho adolescente. Psicol Teor Pesqui. 1999;15:209-18.

MacPhee D. Manual: knowledge of infant development inventory. University of North Carolina; 1981.

MacPhee D, Benson JB, Bullock D. Influence son maternal self-perceptions. In: Paper presented at 5th Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies; 1986 April 10-13; Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Ribas Jr RC. Cognições de mães brasileiras acerca da maternidade e do desenvolvimento humano: uma contribuição ao estudo da psicologia parental [tese]. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 2004.

Sirignano SW, Lachman ME. Personality change during the transition to parenthood: the role of perceived infant temperament. Dev Psychol. 1985;21:558-67.

Ribas Jr RC, Seidl de Moura ML, Hutz CS. Adaptação brasileira da Escala de Desejabilidade Social de Marlowe-Crowne. Aval Psicol. 2004;3:83-91.

Hollingshead AB. Four factor index of social status. Department of Sociology of Yale University; 1975.

Tabachinick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate estatistics. New York: Harper Collins; 1996.

Bornstein MH, Haynes O, Azuma H, GalperinC, Maital S, Ogino M, et al. A cross-national study of self-evaluations and attributions in parenting: Argentina, Belgium, France, Israel, Italy, Japan, and the United States. Dev Psychol. 1998;34:662-76.

Bornstein MH, Hahn CS, Suizzo MA, Haynes OM. Mothers’ knowledge about child development and child-rearing: national and cross-national studies. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; 2006.

Bornstein MH, Hendricks C, Hahn CS, Haynes OM, Painter KM, Tamis-LeMonda CS. Contributors to self-perceived competence, satisfaction, investment, and role balance in maternal parenting: a multivariate ecological analysis. Parent Sci Pract.2003;3:285-326.

Ribas Jr RC, Bornstein MH. Parenting knowledge: similarities and differences in Brazilian mothers and fathers. Int J Psychol.2005;39:5-12.

Stifter C, Bono M. The effect of infant colic on maternal self-perceptions and mother-infant attachment. Child Care Health Dev.1998;24:339-51.

Downloads

Published

2007-04-01

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2007)

Section

Original Research

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis