Assessment of the muscle activity on scoliosis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19906Keywords:
scoliosis, electromyography, spinal musclesAbstract
INTRODUCTION: scoliosis is characterized by tridimensional modifications consisting of lateral curvature on the frontal plane, lateral rotation on the transverse plane, and rectification on the sagittal plane. Measurement of the scoliotic curve is utilized to follow its evolving character and its muscular behavior, and the assessment performed through the electromyography can be an important indicative of predisposition regarding scoliosis progression. The objective of this study was to assess the behavior of muscles involved in the scoliosis biomechanics through the electromyographic exam. METHODS: to accomplish this present study, a nine years old female subject with idiopathic thoracolumbar "S" scoliosis was evaluated. The patient was diagnosed 6 months prior to the study, and presented Cobb angle of 20º in both curvatures. The electromyographic exam assessed the muscles multifidus, longissimus thoracis, and iliocostalis, bilaterally. RESULTS: after analyzing the RMS (Root Means Square) values obtained during rest orthostatism, it was observed activity of the assessed musculature was greater in the left antimere, in the convex side of the primary curvature. CONCLUSIONS: it was observed muscle activation asymmetry, fact that may contribute to the progression of the scoliotic curvature.References
Salate ACB, Aroni FC, Ferreira DMA. Estudo da evolução a curto prazo da escoliose por meio de mensurações da gibosidade, radiográficas e da dor em adolescentes e adultos jovens. Rev Bras Fisioterapia. 2003; 07(01).
Sociedade de Pesquisa em Escoliose. Rev Coluna Fisioterápica. 2001; 01(01): 16-17.
Willner S. Spinal pantograph: a non-invasive technique for describing kyphosis and lordosis in the thoraco-lumbar spine. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:525-9.
Cheung J, Velduizen AG, Halberts JP, Sluiter WJ, Van Horn JR. Geometric and electromyographic assessment in the evaluation of curve progression inidiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2006; 31(03):322-329.
Cheung J; et al. A preliminary study on electromyographic analysis of the paraspinal musculature in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2005; 14(02): 130-137.
Dickson RA. The aetiology of spinal deformities. Lancet. 1988; 21: 1151-1154.
Ding R, Logermann JA, Larson CR, Rademaker AW. The effects of taste and consistency on swallow physiology in younger and older healthy individuals: a surface electromyographic study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003; 46(6): 977-89.
Hermens HJ, et al. European Recommendations for Surface electromyography – SENIAM. Deliverable 8. Biomedical and Health Research Program. Roessingh Research and Development, 1999.
Cailliet R. Escoliose diagnóstico etratamento. São Paulo: Manole, 1979.
Apley AG. Manual de Ortopedia e Fraturas. Rio de Janeiro: Atheneu; 1989.
Perdriolle R. Mechanical process and growth cartilages: essential factors in the progression of scoliosis. Spine. 1993;18(3): 343-349.
Lopez-Sosa F, Guille JT, Bowen JR. Rotation of the spine in congenital scoliosis. J Pediatric Orthopaedies. 1995; 15(4): 528-534.
Coillard C, Rivard CH. Vertebral deformities and scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 1996; 5: 91-100.
Taylor JR, Twomey LT. The role oh the, notochord and blood vessels in vertebral, column development and in the a,etiologyos Schmorl’s nodes. In Manual therapy, 1,The vertebral column. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingsotone, 1984.
Bassani E, Candotti CT, Pasini M, MeloM, La Torre M. Assessment of neuromuscular activation in individual swith scoliosis using surface electromyography. Rev Bras Fisioterapia. 2008; 12(1): 13-19.
Chagas JCM, Schmidt B, Puertas EB, Oliveira CEAS, Freitas AA. Estudo histoquímico dos músculos rotadores do dorso em pacientes com escoliose idiopática do adolescente. Rev Bras Ortopedia. 1998.
Tribastone F. Tratado de exercícios corretivos aplicados à reeducação motora postural. São Paulo: Manole; 2001.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis