Factors associated with onset of mouth breathing in early child development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19914Keywords:
oral breathing, deleterious habits, lip closing, breastfeedingAbstract
PURPOSE: there are several problems related to mouth breathing and there is many consequences in the human health. In this context, this prospective cohort study aims to determine the risk factors associated to the development of mouth breathing in the first periods of children's development. METHODS: The initial group was constituted of 86 babies aging from zero to three months old, selected in the encircled areas of Vitória district, state of Espírito Santo. Seven domiciliary visits were made, collecting data about oral breathing, mixed, labial closing, inter visits respiration alterations, nasal breathing stimulation, common snore when sleeping, the use of baby's milk bottle, pacifier suction, finger suction and breastfeeding. From the initial group, 67 children were assisted until the average age of 29,42 months old (±2,49dp). RESULTS: The prevalence of mouth breathing was of 3,0%. Breastfeeding (ORadj=0,27:0,09-0,83) and the nasal breathing stimulation (ORadj=0,09:0,01-0,52) worked as protection factors against labial closing, while the inter visit breathing alteration (ORadj=7,61:1,09-53,01), pacifier suction (ORadj=5,54:2,00- 15,37) and snoring (ORadj=10,74:2,32-49,64) worked as risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The genesis of the oral breathing initiates by the loss of lip closing, as consequence of the interaction of positive and negative factors about the neurological, bone and muscular complex.Downloads
References
Moyers RE, Carlson DS. Maturação da neuromusculatura orofacial. In: Enlow DH, Crescimento Facial. 3 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Artes Médicas; 1993, p. 260-71.
Torres R. Interfuncionalidad. In: Torres R, Biologia de la boca: Estructura y funcion. 1 ed. Buenos Aires: Panamericana; 1973, p.519-551.
Barbiero EF, Vanderlei LCM, Nascimento PC, Costa MM, Escalabrini-Neto A. Influência do biofeedback respiratório associado ao padrão quiet breathing sobre a função pulmonar e hábitos de respiradores bucais funcionais. Rev Bras Fisioterapia 2007; 11(5): 347-353.
Yi LC, Jardim JR, Inoue DP, Pignatari SSN. The relationship betwe enexcursion of the diaphragm and curvatures of the spinal column in mouth breathing children. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008; 84(2):171-177.
Mocellin L. Alteração oclusal em respiradores bucais. J Bras Ortod Ortop Maxilar 1997; 2: 45-8.
Emmerich AO, Santos-Neto ET, Zandonade E, Matos AM, Silva BP Moraes JR. Estudo sobre alterações craniofaciais em crianças atópicas e/ou asmáticas, Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio Moraes, Vitória-ES, Brasil. UFES Rev Odont 2008; 10(1):39-47.
Lessa FCR, Enoki C, Feres MFN, Valera FCP, Lima WTA, Matsumoto MAN. Influência do padrão respiratório na morfologia craniofacial. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2005; 71(2): 156-60.
Bizetto MSP, Maruo H, Shimizu RH, Guariza-Filho O. Estudo cefalométrico comparativo entre crianças respiradoras bucais e nasais nos diferentes tipos faciais. R Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Facial 2004; 9(1): 79-87.
Aznar T, Galán AF, Marín I, Domínguez A. Dental arch diameters and relationships to oral habits. Angle Orthodontist. 2006; 76 (3): 441-445.
Nascimento-Filho E, Mayer MPA, Pontes P, Pignatari ACC, Weckx LLM. Caries prevalence, levels of Mutansstreptococci, and gingival and plaqueindices in 3.0- to 5.0-year-old mouth breathing children. Caries Res 2004; 38:572-575.
Marchesan IQ. Adapted or Atypical Thrusting?, Int J Orofac Myology. 1999;25:15-17.
Hanson ML, Cohen MS. Effects of for mand function on swallowing and the developing dentition. Am J Orthod 1973;64: 63-82.
Pinto MA, Viana MM, Bommarito S. Sigmatismo anterior: Relação com a mordida aberta e com a respiração bucal. Rev Odonto. 2003; 11(22): 73-83.
Prefeitura de Vitória. Plano Municipal de Saúde. Vitória: Secretaria Municipal de Saúde. Vitória: Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Vitória – CEDOC – Centro de Documentação; 2001.
WHO World Health Organization. WorldHealth Organization’s infant feedingre commendation. Bull World Health Organ. 1995; 73:165-74.
Tomé MC, Marchiori SC. Estudo eletromiográfico dos músculos orbiculares superior e inferior da boca em crianças respiradoras nasais e bucais durante o repouso com e sem contato labial. J Bras Ortodo Ortop Facial 1998;3:59-66.
Vig KWL. Nasal obstruction and facial growth: the strength of evidence for clinical assumptions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 113: 603-11.
Neiva FCB, Cattoni DM, Ramos JLA, Issler H. Desmame precoce: implicações para o desenvolvimento motor-oral. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2003; 79:7-12.
Sakashita R, Kamegai T, Inoue N. Masseter muscle activity in bottle with the chewing bottle teat: evidence from electromyographs. Early Human Development. 1996; 45: 83-92.
Post CLA et al. Fatores prognósticos de letalidade hospitalar por diarréia ou pneumonia em menores de um ano deidade: estudo de caso e controle. Rev. Saúde Pública. 1992; 26(6): 369-378.
Carrascoza KC, Possobon RF, Tomita LM, Moraes ABA. Consequences of bottle-feeding to the oral facial development of initially breastfed children J Pediatr (Rio J).2006;82(5):395-7.
Neifert M, Lawrence RA, Seacat J. Nipple confusion: toward a formal definition. J Pediatr. 1995; 126: s125-s129.
Emmerich AO et al. Relação entre hábitos bucais, alterações oronasofaringianas e mal-oclusões em pré-escolares de Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2004; 20:689-97.
Praetzel JR. Distúrbios Miofuncionais da Face: Um novo paradigma de atuação para a Odontopediatria. JBP – J. Bras. Odontoped. Odontol. Bebê 2002;1(4): 87- 94.
Akerman B. A criança e um de seus objetos substitutivos do amor: a chupeta. Ortodontia, São Paulo 1975; 8(1): 29-37.
Petry C, Pereira MU, Pitrez PMC, Jones MH, Stein RT. The prevalence of symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing in Brazilian schoolchildren J Pediatr(Rio J). 2008;84(2):123-129.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis