Nutritional status and gross motor development of infants between six and eighteen months of age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.19993Keywords:
child development, infant, malnutritionAbstract
Objectives: to evaluate the gross motor performance in infants aged six to 18 months old, through the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS), and to verify if there is an association between the nutritional status and the gross motor performance. METHODS: a cross-sectional case-control study which assessed the gross motor development of infants between six and 18 months old through the AIMS was conducted. Infants were divided into two study groups, the malnoutrished infants and the control group. Each group had 13 infants each, with 6 female participants and 7 male participants, equivalent in age, gender and socioeconomic status. The average age was 14,54 months old. The Mann-Whitney test (continuous variables) and the Exact Fisher Test (categorical variable) was used to compare both groups with a significance level of á=0.05. RESULTS: considering the Raw score and the AIMS' centile index (p= 0,023 e p= 0,002, respectively) a statistically significant difference was found between the groups, observing poor performance (below the 5th centile of the AIMS' normative curve) in 10 (83,3%) infants from the study group and in 2 (16,7%) infants from the control group. CONCLUSION: the results indicate that malnutrition is negatively associated with gross motor development of infants aged 6 to 18 months old. This reaffirms the importance of an integrated approach to help malnourished infants, including the monitoring of motor development and, if necessary, implementation of measures to improve this condition.Downloads
References
Monte CMG. Desnutrição: um desafio secular à nutrição infantil. J Pediatr. Rio J. 2000; 76(Supl 3):S285-9.
ACC/SCN. Nutrition throughout life. 4th Report on the world nutrition situation. Geneva: ACC/SCN./World Health Organization; 2000.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2002-2003: antropometria e análise doestado nutricional de crianças e adolescentes no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; 2006.[acesso em 15 nov 2009]. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/condicaodevida/pof/2002anali-se/default.shtm
WHO. Complementary feeding of young children in developing countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998. [acesso em: 23 nov 2008]. Disponível em: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1998/WHO_NUT_98.1.pdf
Alves CRL, Alvim CG, Junqueira HS, Goulart LMHF, Dias LS, Magalhães MEN et al. Atenção à Saúde da Criança. Secretaria de Estado de Saúde de Minas Gerais. 1ª ed. Belo Horizionte: SAS/DNAS; 2005. p.85.
Plaza B, Brito NI, Torrejón HP, Gloor VC, Medina JMJ, Díaz TT, et al. Algunas consideraciones sobre el impacto de la desnutricion en el desarrollo cerebral, inteligencia y rendimiento escolar. ALAN. 2001; 51(1): 64-71.
Mansur SS, Neto FR. Desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor de lactentes desnutridos. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2006;10(2):185-91.
Meio MDB, Lopes CS, Morsch DS. Fatores prognósticos para o desenvolvimento cognitivo de prematuros de muito baixo peso. Rev Saúde Pública. 2003; 37(3):311-8.
Marcondes E. Desidratação e desnutrição em pediatria. São Paulo: Sarvier; 1971.
Nunes ML. Desnutrição e desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor. J Pediatr (Rio J).2001;77(3):159-60.
McKay H, Sinisterra L, McKay A, Gómez H, Lloreda P. Improving cognitive abilityin chronically deprived children. Science (Wash.). 1978; 200: 270-8.
Galler JR, Ramsey F, Solimano G, Kuscharski LT, Harrison R. The influence of early malnutrition on subsequent behavioral development. iv. Soft neurologic signs. Pediatr Res. 1984;18(9):826-32.
Almeida PS. Avaliação do desenvolvimento mental e psicomotor de crianças de creche com carências nutricionais [dissertação]. Ribeirão Preto: Universidade de São Paulo; 2004.
Darrah J, Piper M, Watt MI. Assessment of gross motor skills of at risk infants: predictive validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol..1998;40:485-91.
Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor Assessment of Developing Infant. W B Saunders. 1994.
Darrah J, Redfern L, Maguire TO, Beaulne P, Watt J. Intra-individual stability of rate of gross motor development in full-term infants. Early Hum Dev. 1998;52:169-79.
Campbell SK, Kolobe THA, Wright BD, Linacre JM. Validity of the test of infant motor performance for prediction of 6-9-and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:263-72.
Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pes-quisa (ABEP): Critério de classificação econômica Brasil 2008. [acesso em: 20 jun. 2008]. Disponível em: http://www.abep.org
Alvarez MDLL, Concha X, Elordi M, Lamilla C, Ramos C, Perez P. Desnutrición infantil, coeficiente de desarrollo y su relación con el medio ambiente: un estudio piloto. Rev Saúde Pública. 1991; 25(4): 282-8.
Drewett R, Wolke D, Azefa M, Kaba M, Tessema F. Malnutrition and mental development: is there a sensitive period? A nested case-control study. J Child Psychol Psychiat. 2001;42(2):181-7.
Hamadani JD, Huda SN, Khatun F, Grantham-McGregor SM. Psychosocial stimulation improves the development of undernourished children in rural Bangladesh. J Nutr. 2006; 136: 2645-52.
Gardner JMM, Grantham-McGregor SM, Chang SM. Activity and behavioral development in stunted and no stunted children and response to nutritional supplementation. Child Dev. 1995;66:1785-97.
Benítez-Bribiesca L, Rosa-Alvarez IDL, Mansilla-Olivares A. Dendritic spine pathology in infants with severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Pediatrics. 1999;104(2):1-6.
Taner EM, Finn-Stevenson M. Nutrition and brain development: social policy implications. Am J Orthopsychiatr. 2002;72(2): 182-93.
Pollitt E. A developmental view of the undernourished child: background and purpose of the study in Pangalengan, Indonesia. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000;54 Supl2, S2-10.
Aboud FE, Alemu T. Nutrition, maternal responsiveness and mental development of ethiopian children. Soc Sci Med (1982).1995;41(5):725-32.
Halpern R, Giugliani ERJ, Victoria CG,Barros FC, Horta BL. Fatores de risco para a suspeita de atraso no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor aos 12 meses de vida. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2000;76:421-8.
UNICEF. The state of the world’s children 1998. Oxford: United Nations Children’s Fund/Oxford University Press; 1997.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis