ATRIBUIÇÃO DE NOMES PRÓPRIOS E SEU PAPEL NO DESENVOLVIMENTO SEGUNDO O RELATO DOS NOMEADOS

Authors

  • Elaine Pedreira Rabinovich
  • Daniela Trovaglini
  • Anna Crisíina Pereira Hulle Coser
  • Eloane Neves Esteves

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.37705

Keywords:

first names, naming.

Abstract

This study replicates and enlarges thw research by Rabinovich et al (1991) on child naming own asking 100 adults suhjects about their names and naming. The previous cathegories were validated. It was concludid that naming may be considered a script given
by parents to their children this script may indicate the future social and familiar role of the named person although this influence is, at most, unknown to the subject.

Author Biographies

  • Elaine Pedreira Rabinovich
    Psicologa Clínica, Mestre em Psicologia, pesquisadora do CDH e bolsista CAPES
  • Daniela Trovaglini
    Aluno do lnstituto de Psicologia/USP
  • Anna Crisíina Pereira Hulle Coser
    Aluno do lnstituto de Psicologia/USP
  • Eloane Neves Esteves
    Aluno do lnstituto de Psicologia/USP

References

Abraham K. Sobre el poder determinante de los nombres. In: Estudios sobre Psicanálise y Psiquiatria. Ed. Horme, Buenos Aires. 1961.p. 29-30.

Aspey WP. Wolf Spider Sociobiology: Agonistic Display and Dominance Sub ordinance Relalions in Adult Male. Scbizocosa Crassipes. Behavior. LXII: 103-141, 1977.

AndersonT, Schmitt PR. Unique First Names in Male and Female Psychiatric Patients. Journal of Social Psychology. 130(6): 835-837, 1989.

Berenstein L. Família e doença mental. Editora Escuta, São Paulo, 1988.

Chevalier J, Gheerbrant A. Dicionário de Símbolos. 4ª edição, José Olímpio Editora, Rio de Janeiro, 1991.

Eagleson OW. Students’s reactions to their given-names. Journal of Social Psychology,223: 187-195, 1946.

Hartman AA, Nicolay RC, Huri EYJ. Unique Personal Names as a social adjustment factor. Journal of Social Psychology, 76:107-110, 1968.

Koskas A. Un prénom et un nom pour écrireun corps. 1985. [Comunicado particular].

Marcus MG. The Power of a Name. Psychology Today. October 1976, p. 75-76.

Martins F. O nome próprio. Univcrsidade de Brasília, Brasília, 1991.

Rabinovich EP et al. Atribuição dos nomes próprios de neonatos. Boletim de Psicologia XLI (94/95), Jan - Dez/ 1991.

Savage BM, Wells FLA. Note on Singularity on Given Names. Journal of Social Psychology, 27: 271-272, 1948.

Schomberg BM, Murphy DM. The Relantionship Between the Uniqueness of Given Name and Personality. Journal of Social Psychology, 93:147, 1974.

Zweigenhaft RL, Hayes KN, Haagen CH. The Psychological Impact of Names. Journal of Social Psychology. 110:203-210, 1980.

Volpi AJ. Edipo, psicodrama do deslino. Agora. São Paulo, 1990.

Downloads

Published

1993-12-19

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (1993)

Section

Case Study

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis