JURIDICAL ASPECTS OF THE CONCEPT OF FAMILY IN BRAZILIAN SOCIETY

Authors

  • Luiz Paulo Santos Aoki
  • Roberto Tardeli

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.37707

Keywords:

concept of family, juridical aspects, synchronic, diachronic.

Abstract

Some basic juridical aspects of the concept of family are presented, as the family came to be imposed on the brazilian sociocultural context.
From a synchronic and from a diachronic perspective, the juridical aspects of its functions and of its anthropological roots were stressed, together with the juridical aspects of the dillemas that, originated in the past, affect the dynamics of the Brazilian family institution nowadays.

Author Biographies

  • Luiz Paulo Santos Aoki
    Promotor de Justiça do Fórum de Botucatu.
  • Roberto Tardeli
    Promotor de Justiça em Exercício do Centro de Apoio Operacional das Promotorias de Justiça da Infância e da Juventudc c da Pessoa Portadora de Deficiência Física - Ministério Público do Estado São Paulo

References

Anchieta J. Informações dos casamentos dos Indios. Rev. 1 Hist. Gea atual Rev. Inst. Geog. Bras., 8,1846.

Bevilaqua C. Direito e família. Rio de Janeiro, 1938.

Código Civil. Lei nº 3071, 01.01.1916.

Código Penal. Lei n° 2848, 07.09.1940.

Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 24.01.1967 e de 1988.

Espínola E. A farntlia no direito civil brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro, 1954.

Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente. Lei nº 8.069, 13.07.1990.

Evans-Pritchard. African Political Systern.London, 1940.

Firth RW. Elernents of social orpanization. London, 1951.

Gomes O. Direito de família. Rio de Janeiro, 1968.

Kroeber AL. et al. Organização social. In: Laraia RB. Textos Básicos de Ciências Sociais. Rio de Janeiro, 1969.

Leach ER. Rethinking antropology, London,1961.

Lévi-Strauss, C. Antropologie structurale. Paris, 1958.

Lowie RH. Metho de der ethnologie. 1911.

Malinowski B. A scientific theory of cultura and other lissas. 1949.

Ml’lennan. Prirnitive rnamage. 1865.

Monteiro WB. Curso de diríeis civil. Direito de família. 1Oª Ed., São Paulo, 1971, V. 2.

Murdock GP. Social structure inSoutheast Asia. New ore, 1960.

Pereira CMS. Instituições cite direito civil. Rio de Janeiro, 1961 - 1972, V. 5.

Pontes de Miranda FC. Tratado de direito de família. 3a Eh., São Paulo, 1947, V. 3.

Radcliffe BAR. The mother’s brother in Soutb Afiica S. Afr: J.Sci,21, 1924.

Wald A. Curso de direito civil brasileiro.2ª Ed., São Paulo, 1969 - 1970 V. 5.

Downloads

Published

1994-06-19

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (1994)

Section

Opinião/Atualização

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis