RESILIENCE: AN INTRODUCTORY DISCUSSION

Authors

  • Maria Cecília Leite de Moraes
  • Elaine Pedreira Rabinovich

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.38369

Keywords:

resilience, resilient.

Abstract

This articie proposes an introductory reading of the issue of resilience, presenting and discussing this concept through bibliographical research and the personal experience the authors
had when they participated in a multicentrical research on resilience. The conciusion poh^lts to the relevance ofthe theme and to its operativity, suggesting, however, the need to deepen the theorethical questions raised by this concept.

Author Biographies

  • Maria Cecília Leite de Moraes
    Terapeuta ocupacional, mestranda em Saúde Pública, na Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo, pesquisadora do Centro de Estudos do Crcscimento e Desenvolvimento do Ser Humano.
  • Elaine Pedreira Rabinovich
    Psicóloga clinica, mestre em Psicologia Experimental, doutoranda em Psicologia Social do instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo. pesquisadora do Centro de Estudos do Crescimento e do Desenvolvimento do Ser Humano. Bolsista - FAPESP.

References

Block J. Ego resilience through time; antecedents and ramifications. Presented at the Fostering Resilence. Conference. Washington D.C. Institute for Mental Health. Iniciatives,1991.

Bowlby J. Apego. S. Paulo, Martins Fontes; 1984.

Bowlby J. Separação. S.Paulo, Martins Fontes, 1984.

Bowlby J. Perda. S. Paulo, Martins Fontes; 1985.

Crittenden PM. Maltreated infants: vulnerability and resilience. Child Psych. Psychyatry 26: 85-96,1985.

Engeland B, Scroufe A. Resilience as process. Presented at the Fostering Resilience Conference. Washington D. C., Institute for Mental Health Iniciatives, 1991.

Fonagy P, Steele M, Steele H, Hig-Gitt A, Target M. The Emanuel Miller Memorial Lecture 1992. The Theory and Practice of Resilience. J. Child Psychol. Psychiat., 35 (2): 231-257, 1994.

Greenspan S. Resilience. Presented at the Fostering Resilience Conference. Washington D.C. Institute for Mental Health Iniciatives, 1991.

Grotberg EH. Promoting resilience in children. A new approach. University of Alabamaat Birmingham. Civitan International Research Center, 1993.

Grotberg EH. The international resilence project. promoting resilience in children. OPS/OMS/ Civitan International. Research Center,1995.

Ihle W, Esser G, Laucht M, Schmidt MH. Vulnerability and resilience in high-risk children. Poster presented at the Twelfth Biennial Meeting of ISSBD, Recife, July19-23, 1993.

Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. In: ROLF, J. et al. eds. Risks and protective factors in the development of psychopathology. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Sameroff AJ. Continuity of developing mental risk. Presented at the Fostering Resilence Conference, Washington D. C., Institute for Mental Health Iniciatives, 1991.

Smith RE, Smoll FL, Ptacek JT. Conjuntive moderator variables in vulnerability and resilience research: life stress, social support and coping skills, and adolescents sport injuries. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58 (2):360-370,1990.

Winnicott DW. O brincar e a realidade. Rio de janeiro, Imago, 1975.

Downloads

Published

1996-12-19

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1-2 (1996)

Section

Opinião/Atualização

License

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis