THE USE OF STORIES IN THE THERAPEUTIC HANDLING OF HOSPITALISED PATIENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.39695Keywords:
stories, therapeutic handling, hospitalised patients, psychosomatic.Abstract
This article provides elements for a reflection on the use of stories in the clinical monitoring of hospitalised somatizing patients, aiming to make this resource become instrumental. To achieve this, theoretical considerations articulated with the clinical vignette are used. The hospitalisation period is generally a short period of crisis, in which the persecution anxiety tends to be exacerbated; it derives from a situation of psychosomatic unbalance and it is a period that is extremely favourable to the emergence of regressive behaviours. Stories are a transitional phenomenon; they are structured in a register that is close to fantasy, and have a strong relationship with unconscious processes; they emerge from a relational context as the result of transferential and counter-transferential manifestations; they carry a metaphoric potential that allows the assigning of a name to the unspeakable. In short, due to their transitional andplaying characteristics and to their metaphoric potential, this resource is a powerful instrument to deal with the most primitive aspects involved in the situations of regression and psychosomatic unbalance presented by the patients in question.
Downloads
References
Bettelheim B. A psicanálise dos contos de fadas. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1980.
Galland A. (versão de). As mil e uma noites. Rio de Janeiro: Livraria Paisagem Rio, s/d.
Gurfinkel D. Psicanálise, regressão epsicossomática: nas bordas do sonhar. Revista Percurso. São Paulo: 1996;16:69-80.
Hisada S. A utilização de histórias no processo psicoterápico: uma proposta Winnicottiana. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter, 1998.
La Planche J, Ponta lis JB. Vocabulário da psicanalise. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1997.
Marty R. Clínica e teoria. In: Marty R. A psicossomática do adulto. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1993. p. 12-46.
Rosenfeld HK. Palavra pescando não palavra: a metáfora na interpretação psicanalítica. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo, 1998.
Safra G. Um método de consulta terapêutica através de estórias infantis. São Paulo, 1984. [Dissertação de Mestrado - Psicologia Clínica do instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo].
Winnicott DW. O brincar e a realidade. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1975.
Winnicott DW. Retreimento e regressão. In: Winnicott DW. Textos selecionados: da pediatria à psicanálise. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves, 1993. p. 427-433.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
