The Challenge of the Public Communication of Science Public Communication of Science in Brazil

Autores/as

  • Sophia Karlla Almeida Motta Gallo Centro de Estudos do Crescimento e do Desenvolvimento Humano (CDH); Medical School of ABC.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.61588

Palabras clave:

Challenge Communication, Public Communication, Public Science, Science Communication, Science in Brazil

Resumen

Antônio Carlos Teixeira’s PhD1 thesis sets out concepts and characteristics that can be used to structure graduate programs in public health in Brazil in terms of the public communication of science. The author presents the results of his study within an exploratory, observational and qualitative perspective and contextualizes them within a globalized world where information circulates regardless of frontiers, the speed of their renewal increasing exponentially as a result of the use of new technologies of communication and information.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Sophia Karlla Almeida Motta Gallo, Centro de Estudos do Crescimento e do Desenvolvimento Humano (CDH); Medical School of ABC.

    Post-Doutoral student in Health Sciences, (Medical School of ABC) and Researcher of
    Centro de Estudos do Crescimento e do Desenvolvimento Humano (CDH).

Referencias

Reference

Teixeira CA (2013). The public communication of Science in graduate programs in public health in Brazil: a perspective of coordinators. [PhD thesis]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da USP. 220p.

Descargas

Publicado

2013-08-30

Número

Vol. 23 Núm. 2 (2013)

Sección

Resenha

Licencia

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis