Simplicity as Virtue: an analysis of Johnjoe McFadden's Ockham's Razor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-2158.i19p284-290Keywords:
Philosophy os Science, Ontology, ReductionismAbstract
The book by McFadden, a professor of molecular genetics at the University of Surrey, United Kingdom, comes at a good time and I consider it of special interest for the field of humanities. It is a good time because the field is full of complexity, relativism, plurality, postmodernism, etc., which take as values the exact opposite of what is exposed in the book as the foundation of science. It is a good time, therefore, because simplicity is already seen as a defect, a vice, when in fact it is the greatest scientific virtue that we have been able to find in several thousand years, as the work argues. Ockham's razor, formulated by the Franciscan friar William of Ockham (1287 - 1347), states that entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity, encouraging the search for simpler explanations for the observed phenomena. McFadden's central argument that "less is more" is presented as a counterbalance to the conceptual overload of relativist and postmodern currents. The defense of assumption economy, based on both philosophical principles and probabilistic methodologies (such as the Bayesian approach), illustrates how science benefits from choosing less ad hoc theories. McFadden accurately traces Ockham's influence on the evolution of scientific thought, connecting it from the beginnings of astronomy in Mesopotamia to the advances in modern physics and biology. Thus, we can infer from the book that it is the key to what Bilate (2024) considered key to academia: finding an ethics for our academic production.
Downloads
References
BILATE, Danilo. Ensaio Histórico sobre o “CHARLATANISMO” em Filosofia. Rio de Janeiro: MUAD, 2024
FEYERABEND, Paul. Contra o método: esboço de uma teoria anárquica da teoria do conhecimento. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves, 1977.
MORIN. E. Introdução ao Pensamento Complexo. Editora Sulina. Porto Alegre, 2015.
SOUZA, Iara Maria de Almeida. A noção de ontologias múltiplas e suas consequências políticas. Ilha Revista de Antropologia, Florianópolis, v. 17, n. 2, p. 049–073, 2015. DOI: 10.5007/2175-8034.2015v17n2p49. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ilha/article/view/2175-8034.2015v17n2p49. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2025.
VIVEIROS DE CASTRO, Eduardo and. Manchester Papers. Social Anthropology, [S.l.], v. 7, p. 1-20, 2003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Leonardo da Silva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License in the "Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International" (CC BY-NC 4.0) modality that allows sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.
- Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- Any doubts or complaints about copyright must be directed to the Editorial Board or qualify and express themselves in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).


