Resistência aos media e desconexão digital na literatura ocidental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v17i2p171-190Palavras-chave:
Resistência, Desconexão, Conectividade, Agência, ContextoResumo
Este artigo visa contribuir para o debate sobre a desconexão digital por meio do conceito de resistência, um construto relacionado e mais estabelecido nos estudos dos media e da comunicação. Para tal, realizámos uma meta-análise aos artigos científicos que abordam ambos os conceitos e destacamos duas tendências principais: uma perspetiva centrada nos media e uma outra centrada no contexto. A análise da literatura sugere que essas duas tendências principais não são lineares nem sequenciais, mas cíclicas e recursivas. Ou seja, essas tendências podem ser entendidas como relatos de ondas de constrangimentos. Em conclusão, o artigo sugere que os estudos sobre a desconexão se beneficiariam se se afastassem de uma perspetiva assente em uma agência individualista em favor de uma abordagem mais sensível ao contexto.
Downloads
Referências
Beattie, A., & Cassidy, E. (2020). Locative disconnection: The use of location-based technologies to make disconnection easier, enforceable and exclusive. Convergence, 27(2), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520956854
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La Distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Les Éditions de Minuit.
Bucher, T. (2020). Nothing to disconnect from? Being singular plural in an age of machine learning. Media. Culture & Society, 42(4), 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720914028
Bräuchler, B., & Postill, J. (2010). Theorising Media as Practice. Berghahn Books.
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U.A. (2019). The Costs of Connection. How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Standford University Press.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Wiley.
Drotner, K. (1999). Dangerous media? Panic discourses and dilemmas of modernity. Paedagogica Historica, 35(3): 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/0030923990350303
Dickinson, J., Hibbert, J., & Filimonau, V. (2016). Mobile technology and the tourist experience: (Dis)connection at the campsite. Tourism Management, 57, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.005
Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2014). It’s Not That We Don’t Know, It’s That We Don’t Care: Explaining Why Selective Exposure Polarizes Attitudes. Mass Communication & Society, 17(1), 74–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.816738
Eisenhart, M. (1998). On the subject of interpretive reviews. Review of Educational Research, 68(4), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068004391
Figueiras, R., & Brites, M. J. (2022). Connecting the individual and the other in disconnection studies. Media, Culture & Society, 44(4), p. 837-847.
Franks, J., Chenhall, R., & Keogh, L. (2018). The Facebook Sabbatical as a Cycle: Describing the Gendered Experience of Young Adults as They Navigate Disconnection and Reconnection. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118801995
Gonzales, A. L., Ems, L., & Suri, V. R. (2016). Cell phone disconnection disrupts access to healthcare and health resources: A technology maintenance perspective. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1422–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814558670
Hesselberth, P. (2018). Discourses on connectivity and the right to disconnect. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1994–2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817711449
Jansson, A. (2018). Mediatization and Mobile Lives. Routledge.
John, N., & Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2015). “I don’t like you any more”: Facebook unfriending by Israelis during the Israel–Gaza conflict of 2014. Journal of Communication, 65(6): 953–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12188
John, N., & Gal, N. (2018). “He’s Got His Own Sea”: Political Facebook Unfriending in the Personal Public Sphere. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2971–2988. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8673/2410
Jorge, A. (2019). Social media, interrupted: users recounting temporary disconnection on Instagram. Social Media + Society, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119881691
Karlsen, F., & Syvertsen, T. (2016). You Can’t Smell Roses Online. Intruding Media and Reverse Domestication. Nordicom Review, 37(s1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0021
Kaun, A., & Schwarzenegger, C. (2014). ““No media, less life?”“ Online disconnection in mediatized worlds. First Monday, 19(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i11.5497
Kaun, A., & Treré, E. (2018). Repression, resistance and lifestyle: charting (dis)connection and activism in times of accelerated capitalism. Social Movement Studies, 9(5-6), 697-715. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1555752
Kline, R. (2003). Resisting consumer technology in rural America: the telephone and electrification. In: Oudshoorn N, & Pinch T (eds.), How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (pp. 51–63). MIT Press.
Kuntsman, A., & Miyake, E. (2019). The paradox and continuum of digital disengagement: Denaturalizing digital sociality and technological connectivity. Media, Culture & Society, 41(6), 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719853732
Light, B. (2014). Disconnecting with Social Networking Sites. Palgrave Macmillan.
Light, B., & Cassidy, E. (2014). Strategies for the suspension and prevention of connection: Rendering disconnection as socioeconomic lubricant with Facebook. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1169–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814544002
Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20(3): 1103-1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930
Lomborg, S. (2020). “Disconnection is futile – Theorizing resistance and human flourishing in an age of datafication. European Journal of Communication, 35(3): 301-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120922094
Manokha, I. (2018). Surveillance, Panoptocism, and Self-Discipline in the Digital Age. Surveillance & Society, 16(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v16i2.8346
Milan, S., & van der Velden, L. (2016). The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0205
Natale, S., & Treré, E. (2020). Vinyl won’t save us: reframing disconnection as engagement. Media, Culture & Society, 42(4), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720914027’
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital%20News%20Report%202017%20web_0.pdf
Pagh, J. (2020). Managing context collapses: The internet as a conditioning technology in the organization of practices. International Journal of Communication 14, 2810–2827. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11872
Palmer, R., & Toff, B. (2020). What Does It Take to Sustain a News Habit? The Role of Civic Duty Norms and a Connection to a “News Community” Among News Avoiders in the UK and Spain. International Journal of Communication 14: 1634–1653. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12252
Palmer, R., & Toff, N. (2022). Defining news avoidance: the importance of overall news consumption and intention. [Paper presentation] ICA conference, Paris.
Portwood-Stacer, L. (2013). Media refusal and conspicuous non-consumption: The performative and political dimensions of Facebook abstention. New Media & Society, 15(7), 1041–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812465139
Rosa, H. (2013). Social Acceleration. Columbia University Press.
Rosenberg, H. (2019). The “flashpacker” and the “unplugger”: Cell phone (dis)connection and the backpacking experience. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918777778
Schrøder, K. C., & BlachØrsten, M. (2016). The nature of news avoidance in a digital world-digital news report 2016. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/essays/2016/nature-news-avoidance-digital-world/
Stroud, N. J., & Collier, J. R. (2018). Selective exposure during the 2016 presidential campaign. In B. Warner, D. G. Bystrom, M. McKinney,& M. C. Banwart (Eds.), An Unprecedented Election: Campaign Coverage, Communication, and Citizens Divided (pp. 21-39). Praeger.
Syvertsen, T. (2017). Media Resistance: Protest, Dislike, Abstention. Palgrave.
Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O.J, & Moe, H. (2014). The Media Welfare State. Nordic Media in the Digital Era. University of Michigan Press.
Treré, E., Natale, S., Keightley, E., & Punathambekar, A. (2020). The limits and boundaries of digital disconnection. Media, Culture & Society, 42(4), 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720922054
Valenzuela, S., Bachmann, I., & Aguilar, M. (2016). Socialized for News Media Use: How Family Communication, Information Processing Needs, and Gratifications Determine Adolescents’ Exposure to News. Communication Research, 46(8), 1095–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215623833
van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
Velkova, J., & Kaun, A. (2019). Algorithmic resistance: media practices and the politics of repair. Information, Communication & Society, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657162
Woodstock, L. (2014). The news-democracy narrative and the unexpected benefits of limited news consumption: The case of news resisters. Journalism, 15(7), 834–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913504260
Woodstock, L. (2016). “It’s kind of like an assault, you know”: media resisters’ meta-decoding practices of media culture. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33, 399-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1222076
Yang, J., Barnidge, M., & Rojas, H. (2017). The politics of “unfriending”: User filtration in response to political disagreement on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.079
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization, Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Rita Figueiras, Maria José Brites, Kim Schrøder
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista para fins não comerciais.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
