Resistência aos media e desconexão digital na literatura ocidental
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v17i2p171-190Mots-clés :
AgênciaRésumé
Este artigo visa contribuir para o debate sobre a desconexão digital por meio do conceito de resistência, um construto relacionado e mais estabelecido nos estudos dos media e da comunicação. Para tal, realizámos uma meta-análise aos artigos científicos que abordam ambos os conceitos e destacamos duas tendências principais: uma perspetiva centrada nos media e uma outra centrada no contexto. A análise da literatura sugere que essas duas tendências principais não são lineares nem sequenciais, mas cíclicas e recursivas. Ou seja, essas tendências podem ser entendidas como relatos de ondas de constrangimentos. Em conclusão, o artigo sugere que os estudos sobre a desconexão se beneficiariam se se afastassem de uma perspetiva assente em uma agência individualista em favor de uma abordagem mais sensível ao contexto.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
Références
Beattie, A., & Cassidy, E. (2020). Locative disconnection: The use of location-based technologies to make disconnection easier, enforceable and exclusive. Convergence, 27(2), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520956854
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La Distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Les Éditions de Minuit.
Bucher, T. (2020). Nothing to disconnect from? Being singular plural in an age of machine learning. Media. Culture & Society, 42(4), 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720914028
Bräuchler, B., & Postill, J. (2010). Theorising Media as Practice. Berghahn Books.
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U.A. (2019). The Costs of Connection. How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Standford University Press.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Wiley.
Drotner, K. (1999). Dangerous media? Panic discourses and dilemmas of modernity. Paedagogica Historica, 35(3): 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/0030923990350303
Dickinson, J., Hibbert, J., & Filimonau, V. (2016). Mobile technology and the tourist experience: (Dis)connection at the campsite. Tourism Management, 57, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.06.005
Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2014). It’s Not That We Don’t Know, It’s That We Don’t Care: Explaining Why Selective Exposure Polarizes Attitudes. Mass Communication & Society, 17(1), 74–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.816738
Eisenhart, M. (1998). On the subject of interpretive reviews. Review of Educational Research, 68(4), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068004391
Figueiras, R., & Brites, M. J. (2022). Connecting the individual and the other in disconnection studies. Media, Culture & Society, 44(4), p. 837-847.
Franks, J., Chenhall, R., & Keogh, L. (2018). The Facebook Sabbatical as a Cycle: Describing the Gendered Experience of Young Adults as They Navigate Disconnection and Reconnection. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118801995
Gonzales, A. L., Ems, L., & Suri, V. R. (2016). Cell phone disconnection disrupts access to healthcare and health resources: A technology maintenance perspective. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1422–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814558670
Hesselberth, P. (2018). Discourses on connectivity and the right to disconnect. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1994–2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817711449
Jansson, A. (2018). Mediatization and Mobile Lives. Routledge.
John, N., & Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2015). “I don’t like you any more”: Facebook unfriending by Israelis during the Israel–Gaza conflict of 2014. Journal of Communication, 65(6): 953–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12188
John, N., & Gal, N. (2018). “He’s Got His Own Sea”: Political Facebook Unfriending in the Personal Public Sphere. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2971–2988. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8673/2410
Jorge, A. (2019). Social media, interrupted: users recounting temporary disconnection on Instagram. Social Media + Society, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119881691
Karlsen, F., & Syvertsen, T. (2016). You Can’t Smell Roses Online. Intruding Media and Reverse Domestication. Nordicom Review, 37(s1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0021
Kaun, A., & Schwarzenegger, C. (2014). ““No media, less life?”“ Online disconnection in mediatized worlds. First Monday, 19(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i11.5497
Kaun, A., & Treré, E. (2018). Repression, resistance and lifestyle: charting (dis)connection and activism in times of accelerated capitalism. Social Movement Studies, 9(5-6), 697-715. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1555752
Kline, R. (2003). Resisting consumer technology in rural America: the telephone and electrification. In: Oudshoorn N, & Pinch T (eds.), How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (pp. 51–63). MIT Press.
Kuntsman, A., & Miyake, E. (2019). The paradox and continuum of digital disengagement: Denaturalizing digital sociality and technological connectivity. Media, Culture & Society, 41(6), 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719853732
Light, B. (2014). Disconnecting with Social Networking Sites. Palgrave Macmillan.
Light, B., & Cassidy, E. (2014). Strategies for the suspension and prevention of connection: Rendering disconnection as socioeconomic lubricant with Facebook. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1169–1184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814544002
Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20(3): 1103-1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930
Lomborg, S. (2020). “Disconnection is futile – Theorizing resistance and human flourishing in an age of datafication. European Journal of Communication, 35(3): 301-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120922094
Manokha, I. (2018). Surveillance, Panoptocism, and Self-Discipline in the Digital Age. Surveillance & Society, 16(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v16i2.8346
Milan, S., & van der Velden, L. (2016). The alternative epistemologies of data activism. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2): 57–74. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0205
Natale, S., & Treré, E. (2020). Vinyl won’t save us: reframing disconnection as engagement. Media, Culture & Society, 42(4), 626–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720914027’
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital%20News%20Report%202017%20web_0.pdf
Pagh, J. (2020). Managing context collapses: The internet as a conditioning technology in the organization of practices. International Journal of Communication 14, 2810–2827. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11872
Palmer, R., & Toff, B. (2020). What Does It Take to Sustain a News Habit? The Role of Civic Duty Norms and a Connection to a “News Community” Among News Avoiders in the UK and Spain. International Journal of Communication 14: 1634–1653. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/12252
Palmer, R., & Toff, N. (2022). Defining news avoidance: the importance of overall news consumption and intention. [Paper presentation] ICA conference, Paris.
Portwood-Stacer, L. (2013). Media refusal and conspicuous non-consumption: The performative and political dimensions of Facebook abstention. New Media & Society, 15(7), 1041–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812465139
Rosa, H. (2013). Social Acceleration. Columbia University Press.
Rosenberg, H. (2019). The “flashpacker” and the “unplugger”: Cell phone (dis)connection and the backpacking experience. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918777778
Schrøder, K. C., & BlachØrsten, M. (2016). The nature of news avoidance in a digital world-digital news report 2016. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/essays/2016/nature-news-avoidance-digital-world/
Stroud, N. J., & Collier, J. R. (2018). Selective exposure during the 2016 presidential campaign. In B. Warner, D. G. Bystrom, M. McKinney,& M. C. Banwart (Eds.), An Unprecedented Election: Campaign Coverage, Communication, and Citizens Divided (pp. 21-39). Praeger.
Syvertsen, T. (2017). Media Resistance: Protest, Dislike, Abstention. Palgrave.
Syvertsen, T., Enli, G., Mjøs, O.J, & Moe, H. (2014). The Media Welfare State. Nordic Media in the Digital Era. University of Michigan Press.
Treré, E., Natale, S., Keightley, E., & Punathambekar, A. (2020). The limits and boundaries of digital disconnection. Media, Culture & Society, 42(4), 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720922054
Valenzuela, S., Bachmann, I., & Aguilar, M. (2016). Socialized for News Media Use: How Family Communication, Information Processing Needs, and Gratifications Determine Adolescents’ Exposure to News. Communication Research, 46(8), 1095–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215623833
van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
Velkova, J., & Kaun, A. (2019). Algorithmic resistance: media practices and the politics of repair. Information, Communication & Society, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657162
Woodstock, L. (2014). The news-democracy narrative and the unexpected benefits of limited news consumption: The case of news resisters. Journalism, 15(7), 834–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913504260
Woodstock, L. (2016). “It’s kind of like an assault, you know”: media resisters’ meta-decoding practices of media culture. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33, 399-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1222076
Yang, J., Barnidge, M., & Rojas, H. (2017). The politics of “unfriending”: User filtration in response to political disagreement on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.079
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization, Journal of Information Technology, 30, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Copyright Rita Figueiras, Maria José Brites, Kim Schrøder 2023
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
Les auteurs qui publient dans ce journal acceptent les termes suivants:
- Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication, le travail étant concédé simultanément sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) qui permet le partage de l'œuvre avec reconnaissance de la paternité et de la publication initiale dans cette revue à des fins non commerciales.
- Les auteurs sont autorisés à assumer des contrats supplémentaires séparément, pour une distribution non exclusive de la version de l'ouvrage publiée dans cette revue (par exemple, publication dans un référentiel institutionnel ou en tant que chapitre de livre), avec reconnaissance de la paternité et de la publication initiale dans cette revue.
