The medium is the mediation: postphenomenological views on datacratic contexts

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v12i1p131-153

Keywords:

Postphenomenology, science and technology studies, digital culture, communication epistemology, datacracy

Abstract

As technological innovations transform communication processes, Jesus Martín-Barbero’s Theory of Mediations continues to play a fundamental role in the epistemological debates about the environment of communications in interactive networks. Social media, which, according to a postphenomenological approach, have intentionality and moral agency, have become the preferential mediations of contemporary communications, turning collective environments into datacracies, regimes in which databases and algorithms have great influence on decision making. The Theory of Mediations, by evidencing the importance of the communicative nature of Culture, is essential for the identification of the influence of communication in contemporary ideological formation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Luli Radfahrer, Universidade de São Paulo. Escola de Comunicações e Artes

    Luli Radfahrer (Luiz Guilherme Antunes) é professor-doutor de Comunicação Digital do departamento de Relações Públicas, Publicidade e Turismo da ECA-USP há 21 anos. Lidera o grupo de pesquisa Datacracia, na área de estudos de epistemologia da comunicação social e interação humano-computador e a incubadora de projetos IRIS.

References

ASIMOV, I. The caves of steel. New York: Doubleday, 1954.

BENJAMIN, Walter. The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility and other writings on media. London: Harvard University Press, 2008.

BOGOST, I. The cathedral of computation. The Atlantic, Washington, D.C., 15 jan. 2015. Disponível em: <https://goo.gl/q1snJz>. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2017.

BREY, P. From moral agents to moral factors: the structural ethics approach. In: KROES, P.; VERBEEK, P. (Eds.). The moral status of technical artefacts. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014. p. 125-142.

CANCLINI, N. G. Culturas híbridas. 4. ed. São Paulo: Edusp, 2003.

ECO, U. Obra aberta: forma e indeterminação nas poéticas contemporâneas. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1979.

GIBSON, W. Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books, 1984.

HABERMAS, J. Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press, 1968.

HEIDEGGER, M. The question concerning technology & other essays. New York: Garland, 1977.

INTRONA, L. D. Towards a post-human intra-actional account of sociomaterial agency (and morality). In: JOHNSON, C. The information diet. San Francisco: O’Reilly Media, 2015. p. 31-53.

JASPERS, K. The atom bomb and the future of man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.

KELLY, K. What technology wants. New York: Penguin Group, 2010.

KING, S. Under the dome. New York: Scribner, 2009.

KROES, P.; VERBEEK, P. (eds.). The moral status of technical artefacts. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.

LATOUR, B. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford Press University, 2005.

LUEPNITZ, D. Schopenhauer’s porcupines: intimacy and its dilemmas: five stories of psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books, 2003.

MANOVICH, L. The algorithms of our lives. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Washington, D.C., 16 dez. 2013. Disponível em: <https://goo.gl/oAvjTK>. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2017.

MARTÍN-BARBERO, J. Dos meios às mediações: comunicação, cultura e hegemonia. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da UFRJ, 1997.

______. As formas mestiças da mídia: entrevista concedida a Mariluce Moura. Revista Pesquisa Fapesp, São Paulo, n. 163, p. 10-15, set. 2009.

MCLUHAN, M. Understanding media: the extensions of man. London: MIT Press, 1994.

MOROZOV, E. To save everything, click here. New York: PublicAffairs, 2013.

MUMFORD, L. Technics and civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.

PARISER, E. The filter bubble: what the Internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press, 2011.POSTMAN, N. Technopoly: the surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage Books, 1993.

RAGON, M. Histoire de la littérature proletarienne en France. Paris: Albin Michel, 1974.

TAYLOR, F. Princípios de administração científica. 8. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.

VERBEEK, P. Some misunderstandings about the moral significance of technology. In KROES, P., VERBEEK, P. (Eds). The moral status of technical artefacts. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014. p. 75-88.

WEBER, M. The sociology of religion. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.

ZHAO, J. et al. Men also like shopping: reducing gender bias amplification using corpus-level constraints. In: CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2017, Copenhagen. Proceedings... 2017. Disponível em: <https://goo.gl/K3abry>. Acesso em: 28 ago. 2017.

Published

2018-05-03

Issue

Section

Dossier

How to Cite

Radfahrer, L. (2018). The medium is the mediation: postphenomenological views on datacratic contexts. MATRIZes, 12(1), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v12i1p131-153