Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty: Cinema in its Continuous Rebirth

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v16i2p99-118

Keywords:

Cinema, Deleuze, Merleau-Ponty

Abstract

Some of the most innovative and influential ideas in film theory in recent years are indebted to the works of Gilles Deleuze and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. It is possible to feel the presence of their philosophies and respective investments in the theory of cinema throughout the affective and sensory turns that have taken over the reflection on the seventh art. However, Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty are generally seen as opposites. Our bet is in the reverse direction. Throughout the article, we trace a slippery movement which draws the philosophers close and distances them and, at the end, outlines a kind of alliance. What is envisioned is a way of seeing and venturing through cinema in its continuous rebirth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Júlio Bezerra, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul

    Professor of the Journalism and Audiovisual courses and of the Graduate Program in Communication of the Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS). Postdoctorate degree from Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ).

References

Andrew, D. (1978). The neglected tradition of phenomenology in film theory. Wide Angle, 2(2), 44-49.

Barbaras, R. (2004). The being of the phenomenon: Merleau-Ponty’s ontology. Indiana University Press.

Barbaras, R. (2014). The being of the phenomenon: Merleau-Ponty’s ontology. Indiana University Press.

Barker, J. (2009). The tactile eye: Touch and the cinematic experience. University of California Press.

Beaulieu, A. (2004). Gilles Deleuze et la phénoménologie. Sils Maria.

Deleuze, G. (1974). Lógica do sentido. Perspectiva.

Deleuze, G. (1985). A imagem-movimento. Brasiliense.

Deleuze, G. (1992). Conversações. Editora 34.

Deleuze, G. (1995). A imagem-tempo. Brasiliense.

Deleuze, G. (2007). Francis Bacon: Lógica da sensação. Jorge Zahar.

Foucault, M. (1977). Theatrum Philosophicum. In M. Foucault, Language, counter-memory, practice (D. F. Bouchard, Ed., pp. 165-196). Cornell University Press.

Hagin, B. (2011). Inverted identification: Bergson and phenomenology in Deleuze’s cinema books. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 11(3), 262-287.

Hughes, J. (2008). Schizoanalysis and the phenomenology of cinema. In I. Buchanan & P. MacCormack (Eds.), Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of Cinema (pp. 15-26). Continuum.

Husserl, E. (2005). Phantasy, image consciousness, and memory (1898-1925). Springer.

Kennedy, B. (2000). Deleuze and cinema: The aesthetics of sensation. Edinburgh University Press.

Marks, L. (2000). The skin of film. Duke University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1983). O cinema e a nova psicologia. In I. Xavier (Org.), A experiência do cinema (pp. 103-118). Graal.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1991). Signos. Martins Fontes.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1994). Fenomenologia da percepção. Martins Fontes.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2000). O visível e o invisível. Perspectiva.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). O olho e o espírito. Cosac Naify.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2006a). A natureza. Martins Fontes.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2006b). Estrutura do comportamento. Martins Fontes.

Ramos, F. P. (2012). A imagem-câmera. Papirus.

Shaviro, S. (1993). The cinematic body. University of Minnesota Press.

Sobchack, V. (1992). The address of the eye: A phenomenology of film experience. Princeton University Press.

Ungaro, J. (2000). Andre Bazin: Genealogies d’une theorie. L’Harmattan.

Virilio, P. (1997). Voyage d’hiver. Parenthèses.

Wambacq, J. (2017). Thinking between Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty. Ohio University Press.

Published

2022-09-02

Issue

Section

Dossier

How to Cite

Bezerra, J. (2022). Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty: Cinema in its Continuous Rebirth. MATRIZes, 16(2), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v16i2p99-118