Mobility as a contradiction of urban space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v4i1p165-177Keywords:
mobility, network, cyberspace, urban, city.Abstract
If we wish to study the impact of new technologies on Communication Society and its relations with urban space, it seems essential that we confront the implications of that technology in terms of the city’s functional and social equipment. In this comparison, confluences and differences are found between the modern city and that other, understood as being liquid and the result of potential mobility and real sociability within a network, making it contradictory to what is traditionally understood as a city. Recognizing those confluences in order to define their social differences and, consequently, understanding whether it is possible to talk about urban space or a city network, will be the focus of this paper: we will look at how mobility, urban space and networks are names that are used to characterize the city of yesterday and that of today. However, although these urban dimensions cannot be confused from a cognitive and social point of view, they are essential to understanding the characteristics of the network city.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2011-12-15
Issue
Section
Em Pauta/Agenda
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal for non-commercial purposes.
- Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
How to Cite
Ferrara, L. d'Alessio. (2011). Mobility as a contradiction of urban space. MATRIZes, 4(1), 165-177. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v4i1p165-177