Comunicando o conhecimento acadêmico além do texto acadêmico escrito: uma análise autoetnográfica do experimento da instalação Mirror Palace of Democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v14i2p75-99Palabras clave:
Comunicação acadêmica, Estudo acadêmico multimodal, Pesquisa baseada nas artes, Instalação artística, DemocraciaResumen
O artigo discute inicialmente cinco abordagens que visam transcender, complementar ou desestabilizar a hegemonia do texto acadêmico escrito. Na segunda parte, o experimento da instalação Mirror Palace of Democracy, que tinha o objetivo explícito de ir além do texto acadêmico escrito, permanecendo no domínio da comunicação do conhecimento acadêmico, é analisada autoetnograficamente. A experiência permitiu refletir sobre o caráter integrado e iterativo da comunicação acadêmica, sobre a identidade híbrida acadêmico-artística e sobre a diversificação de públicos. Tanto a discussão teórica como a instalação Mirror Palace of Democracy fazem parte de um apelo a mais experimentação e teorização da comunicação acadêmica multimodal e/ou baseada nas artes.
Descargas
Referencias
Alter, N. (2018). Introduction. In N. Alter (Ed.), The essay film after fact and fiction (pp. 1-29). Columbia University Press.
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology,
(2), 139-160.
Barone, T. (2008). Creative nonfiction and social research. In J. G. Knowles & A. Cole (Eds.),
Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 105-115). SAGE Publications.
Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. Blackwell.
Bateson, G., & Mead, M. (1942). Balinese character: A photographic analysis. New York Academy of Sciences. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press.
Bennett, W. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and hanging patterns of participation.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20-39. https://
doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428
Bishop, C. (2005). Installation art: A critical history. Tate Publishing. Blundell, T. (2017). Protein crystallography and drug discovery: Recollections of knowledge exchange between academia and industry. IUCrJ, 4, 308-321. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052252517009241
Bryant, C. (2003). Does Australia need a more effective policy of science communication?
International Journal of Parasitology, 33, 357-361. https://doi.org/10.1016s0020-7519(03)00004-3
Burns, T., O’Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. (2003). Science communication:
A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12, 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625030122004
Capous-Desyllas, M., & Morgaine, K. (2018). Preface. In M. Capous-Desyllas, & K. Morgaine (Eds.), Creating social change through creativity: Anti-oppressive arts-based research methodologies (pp. vii-xix). Palgrave Macmillan.
Carpentier, N. (2017). The discursive-material knot: Cyprus in conflict and community media participation. Peter Lang.
Carpentier, N. (Ed.). (2019). Respublika! Experiments in the performance of
participation and democracy. NeMe.
Chaplin, E. (1994). Sociology and visual representation. Routledge.
Chapman, O., & Sawchuk, K. (2015). Creation-as-research: Critical making in complex environments.
RACAR: Revue d’art Canadienne/Canadian Art Review, 40(1), 49-52. https://doi.org/10.230724327426
Collins, S., Durington, M., & Gill, H. (2017). Multimodality: An invitation. American Anthropologist, 119(1), 142-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12826
Cooperman, H. (2018). Listening through performance: Identity, embodiment,
and arts-based research. In M. Capous-Desyllas, & K. Morgaine (Eds.),
Creating social change through creativity: Antioppressive arts-based research
methodologies (pp. 19-35). Palgrave Macmillan.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new
learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Continuum.
Eisner, E. (2008). Art and knowledge. In J. G. Knowles, & A. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 3-12). SAGE Publications.
Elkins, J. (Ed.). (2007). Visual practices across the university. Wilhelm Fink.
Ellis, C., Adams, T., & Bochner, A. (2010). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), art. 10. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2R7MhbC
Fahnestock, J. (1986). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts.
Written Communication, 3(3), 275-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088398015003006
Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the
monopoly with participative action research . Intermediate Technology/Apex.
Finley, S. (2008). Arts-based research. In J. G. Knowles, & A. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 71-81). SAGE Publications.
Ford, B. (1992). Images of science: A history of scientific illustration. British Library.
Freeman, M. (2016). Approaching knowledge exchange. In M. Freeman (Ed.), Industrial approaches to media: A methodological gateway to industry studies (pp. 153-174). Palgrave Macmillan.
Gibbs, A. (2003). Writing and the flesh of others. Australian Feminist Studies, 18(42), 309-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0816464032000171403
Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press.
Grady, J. (1996). The scope of visual sociology. Visual Sociology, 11(2), 10-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725869608583762
Guattari, F. (1993). Machinic heterogenesis. In V. Conley (Ed.), Rethinking technologies
(pp. 13-27). University of Minnesota Press.
Gutberlet, J., Oliveira, B. J., & Tremblay, C. (2017). Arts-based and participatory action research with recycling cooperatives. In L. Rowell, C. Bruce, J. Shosh, & M. Riel (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of action research (pp. 699-715). Palgrave Macmillan.
Haas, G. (2017). Fictocritical strategies: Subverting textual practices of meaning, other, and self-formation . Transcript Verlag.
Henderson, L., Hogan, M., Christian, A., & Erni, J. (2018). A dossier on making and doing. In A. Shaw & D. T. Scott (Eds.), Interventions: Communication research and practice (pp. 273-284). Peter Lang.
Hockings, P. (Ed.). (1995). Principles of visual anthropology (2a ed.). de Gruyter.
Holm, G. (2008). Visual research methods: Where are we and where are we going? In S. Nagy Hesse-Biber, & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 325-342). Guilford Press.
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. John Benjamins.
Jagodzinski, J., & Wallin, J. (2013). Arts-based research: A critique and a proposal.
Sense Publishers. Janesick, V. (2001). Intuition and creativity: A pas de deux for qualitative researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(5), 531-540. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700501
Jarldorn, M. (2019). Photovoice handbook for social workers: Method, practicalities and possibilities for social change. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kara, H. (2015). Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide. Polity Press.
Khadka, S., & Lee, J. (Eds.). (2019). Bridging the multimodal gap: From theory to practice. Utah State University Press.
Klein, J. (2017, 23 de abril). What is artistic research? Journal for Artistic Research. Retrieved from https://www.jar-online.net/what-artistic-research
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso.
Lapum, J. (2018). Installation art: The voyage never ends. In P. Leavy (Ed.), Handbook of arts-based research (pp. 377-395). Guilford Press.
Leavy, P. (2011). Low-fat love. Sense Publishers.
Leavy, P. (2015). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice (2a ed.). Guilford Press.
Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. Martin, & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science
(pp. 87-113). Routledge.
Lewis, J. (2008). Cultural studies: The basics (2a ed.). SAGE Publications.
Literat, I., Conover, A., Herbert-Wasson, E., Page, K., Riina-Ferrie, J., Stephens, R., Thanapornsangsuth, S, & Vasudevan, L. (2018). Toward multimodal inquiry: Opportunities, challenges and implications of multimodality for research and scholarship. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 565-578. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1389857
Loveless, N. (2015). Towards a manifesto on research-creation. RACAR: Revue d’art Canadienne/Canadian Art Review, 40(1), https://doi.org/52-54. 10.2307/24327427
Lutkewitte, C. (2013). Multimodal composition: A critical sourcebook. Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Matschke, C., Moskaliuk, J., & Cress, U. (2012). Knowledge exchange using Web 2.0 technologies in NGOs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo.2012.08126daa.010
McPherson, T. (2009). Introduction: Media studies and the digital humanities. Cinema Journal,
(2), 119-123. Mead, M. (1995). Visual anthropology in a discipline of words. In P. Hockings
(Ed.), Principles of visual anthropology (2a ed., pp. 3-10). de Gruyter.
Meyer, M. (2010). The rise of the knowledge broker. Science Communication, 32(1), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009359797
Mitchell, H. (2006). Knowledge sharing: The value of storytelling. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 9(5), 632-641.
Mitchell, W. (1994). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation.
University of Chicago Press.
Moncaster, A., Hinds, D., Cruickshank, H., Guthrie, P., Crishna, N., Baker, Beckmann, K., & Jowitt, P. W. (2010). Knowledge exchange between academia and industry. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Engineering Sustainability, 163
(3), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.2010.163.3.167 Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Routledge. Müllerleile, A. (2014). European studies and public engagement: A conceptual toolbox. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 10(4), 505-517. Retrieved form https://bit.ly/3bCNkcO
Murdock, A., Shariff, R., & Wilding, K. (2013). Knowledge exchange between academia and the third sector. Evidence & Policy, 9(3), 419-430. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426413X671086
Murray, J. (2009). Non-discursive rhetoric: Image and affect in multimodal composition. State University of New York Press.
Norman, D. (1988). The design of everyday things. Basic Books. Pink, S. (2004). Introduction: Situating visual research. In S. Pink, L. Kürti, & A. Afonso (Eds.), Working images: Visual research and representation in ethnography (pp. 1-10). Routledge. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. SAGE Publications.
Reid, G., Snead, R., Pettiway, K., & Simoneaux, B. (2016). Multimodal communication in the university: Surveying faculty across disciplines. Across the Disciplines: A Journal of Language, Learning and Academic Writing, 3(1). 1-29. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3bDtC0A
Routledge, P. (1996). The third space as critical engagement. Antipode, 28(4), 399-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1996.tb00533.x
Saldaña, J. (Ed.). (2005). Ethnodrama: An anthology of reality theatre. AltaMira Press.
Saldaña, J. (2011). Ethnotheatre: Research from page to stage. Left Coast Press.
Selfe, C. (Ed.). (2007). Multimodal composition: Resources for teachers. Hampton Press.
Shipka, J. (2011). Toward a composition made whole. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Sinner, A. (2014). Flight of the “artademics”: Scholarly gentrification and conceptual+art discourses. Visual Arts Research, 40(1), 124-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/10.5406visuartsrese.40.1.0124
Takayoshi, P., & Selfe, C. (2007). Thinking about multimodality. In C. Selfe (Ed.), Multimodal composition: Resources for teachers (pp. 1-12). Hampton Press.
Thorndike-Breeze, R., Block, A., & Brown, K. (2019). Entering the multiverse: Using comics to experiment with multimodality, multigenres and multiliteracies. In S. Khadka, & J. Lee (Eds.),
Bridging the multimodal gap: From theory to practice (pp. 159-181). Utah State University Press.
Trench, B., & Bucchi, M. (2010). Science communication: An emerging discipline. Journal of Science Communication, 9(3), C03. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.09030303
Tyler, S. (1986). Post-modern ethnography: From document of the occult to occult document. In J. Clifford, & G. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography
(pp. 122-140). University of California Press. Unicef. (2015). Knowledge exchange toolbox: Group methods for sharing, discovery and co-creation.
Veneti, A., Jackson, D., & Lilleker, D. (Eds.). (2019). Visual political communication. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wysocki, R., Udelson, J., Ray, C., Newman, J., Matravers, L., Kumari, A., Gordon, L. M. P., Scott, K. L., Day, M., Baumann, Alvarez, S. A., & DeVoss, N. (2019). On multimodality: A manifesto. In S. Khadka, & J. Lee (Eds.), Bridging the multimodal gap: From theory to practice (pp. 17-29). Utah State University Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista aceptan los siguientes términos:
- Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor y otorgan a la revista el derecho a la primera publicación, con el trabajo licenciado simultáneamente bajo la Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista para fines no comerciales.
- Los autores están autorizados a asumir contratos adicionales por separado, para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicado en esta revista (por ejemplo: publicación en repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
