Tecnologias de comunicação transformadoras: o desafio da accountability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v13i1p71-90Parole chiave:
Mídia, tecnologias de comunicação, transformações sociais, accountabilityAbstract
O trabalho aborda as causas e consequências das transformações na mídia e nas tecnologias de comunicação, discutindo se os grandes atores globais responsáveis por elas devem prestar contas pelo modo como o ambiente digitalmente mediado está se alterando. Tecnologias de comunicação mais antigas também trouxeram à tona discussões sobre a accountability. No entanto, hoje surgem novas questões sobre o tema, em relação à inteligência artificial, algoritmos, big data e aprendizado de máquina. Diante de possíveis danos e riscos da inovação digital, defende-se que, para garantir benefícios aos cidadãos, seja realizado um amplo debate, bem como pesquisas que possam dar apoio a políticas públicas preventivas.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
Amoore, L. A. (2011). Data derivatives: On the emergence of a security risk calculus for our times. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 24-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411417430
Annett, A. (2016). Human flourishing, the common good, and Catholic social teaching. In J. Sachs, L. Becchetti, & A. Annett (Eds.), World happiness report 2016: Special Rome edition (Vol. 2, pp. 38-65). Nova Iorque: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. Nova Iorque, NY: Allen Lane.
Atkinson, A. B. (2008). The changing distribution of earnings in OECD countries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Autor, D. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 7-30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3
Bauer, J. M. (2017). The Internet and Income Inequality: Socio-economic Challenges in a Hyperconnected Society. Telecommunications Policy, 42(4), 333-343. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.05.09
Berger, T., & Frey, C. B. (2016). Digitalisation, deindustrialisation and the future of work (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 193). Paris, França: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/gr97urj
Bijker, W., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2012). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Nova Iorque: Norton.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Castells, M., & Himanen, P. (Eds.). (2014). Reconceptualizing development in the global information age. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Couldry, N., & Powell, A. (2014). Big data from the bottom up. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714539277
Crawford, K., & Whittaker, M. (2016). The AI Now report: The social and economic implications of artificial intelligence technologies in the near-term. Artigo apresentado no Simpósio Público, White House, New York University Information Law Institute, Nova Iorque. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/jqxcegk
David, P. A. (2012). The innovation fetish among the economoi: Introduction to the panel on innovation incentives, institutions, and economic growth. In J. Lerner, & S. Stern (Eds.), The rate and direction of inventive activity revisited (pp. 509-514). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
European Commission. (2016a). A new skills agenda for Europe, COM [2016]
final. Bruxelas, BE. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/j4o7fv3
European Commission. (2016b). Digitising European industry: Reaping the full benefits of a digital single market, COM [2016] 180 final. Bruxelas, BE. Recuperado de
European Commission. (2016c). Directive (EU) 2016/680 on the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, OJ L119/89. Bruxelas, BE. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/j4o7fv3
European Parliament. (2016). Draft report with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103[INL]). Bruxelas, BE: European Parliament Committee of Legal Affairs. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/gpvzt6m
Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2014). The antitrust analysis of multi-sided platform businesses. In R. D. Blair, & D. D. Sokol (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international antitrust economics (Vol. 1, pp. 404-450). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S., & Martin, B. R. (2016). The triple challenge for Europe: The economy, climate change, and governance. Challenge, 59(3), 178-204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2016.1171668
Freeman, C., & Louça, F. (2001). As time goes by: From industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1994). Work for all or mass unemployment? Computerised technical change into the twenty-first century. Londres, UK: Pinter.
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? (Oxford Martin School Working Paper). Oxford, UK: Oxford University. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/oj67kae
Gawer, A. (2009). Platform dynamics and strategies: from products to services. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 45-76). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P. J., & Foot, K. A. (Eds.). (2014). Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality and society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hall, W., Hendler, J., & Staab, S. (2016, dezembro). Web Science@10. Web Science Trust. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/h5e8l59
Hatmaker, T. (2017). Saudi Arabia bestows citizenship on a robot named Sophia. TechCrunch.com. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/yaylqkan
Hecht, G., & Allen, M. T. (2001). Introduction: Authority, political machines, and technology’s history. In M. T. Allen, & G. Hecht (Eds.), Technologies of power: Essays in honor of Thomas Parke Hughes and Agatha Chipley Hughes (pp. 1-20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
House of Commons (2016). Robotics and artificial intelligence (Fifth Report of Session 2016-17). Londres, UK: House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/jr6pd2b
Jourova, V. (2016). How does the data protection reform strengthen citizens’ rights? Bruxelas, BE: European Commission Fact Sheet.
Kelly, K. (2016). The inevitable: understanding the 12 technological forces that will shape our future. Nova Iorque: Viking Press.
Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
Kitman, J. L. (2016, 10 de dezembro). Google wants driverless cars, but do we? The New York Times. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/j5o3zw2
Lemstra, W. & Melody, W. H. (Eds.). (2014). The dynamics of broadband markets in Europe: Realizing the 2020 digital agenda. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Livingstone, S., Olafsson, K., & Maier, G. (2017, 18 de julho). If children don’t know an ad from information, how can they grasp how companies use their personal data? [Postagem de blog]. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/ya26w9so
Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (2016). Is ‘mediatization’ the new paradigm for our field? A commentary on Deacon and Stanyer (2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby (2015). Media, Culture & Society, 38(3), 462-470. doi: 10.1177/0163443716631288
Mansell, R. (1996). Communication by design? In R. Mansell, &. R. Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies (pp. 15-43). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mansell, R. (2012). Imagining the internet: Communication, innovation and governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mansell, R. (2015). The public’s interest in intermediaries. Info, 17(6), 8-18. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/info-05-2015-0035
Mansell, R., & Silverstone, R. (1996). Introduction. In R. Mansell, & R. Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies (pp. 1-14). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mason, P. (2015). Postcapitalism: A guide to our future. Londres, UK: Allen Lane.
McChesney, R. W., & Nichols, J. (2016). People get ready: The fight against a jobless economy and a citizenless democracy. Nova Iorque: Nation Books.
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Londres, UK: Verso Books.
National Science and Technology Council (2016). Preparing for the future of artificial intelligence. Washington, DC: US Executive Office of the President (October). Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/h4ekpt2
Nussbaum, M. C. (2012). Who is the happy warrior? Philosophy, happiness research, and public policy. International Review of Economics, 59(4), 335-361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-012-0168-7
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433-474. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211644
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (A. Goldhammer, Trad.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293-310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (Eds.). (2013). The digital divide: The Internet and social inequality in international perspective. Nova Iorque: Routledge.
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier (Edição revista). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., et al. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569-582. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2016). Framing innovation policy for transformative change: Innovation policy 3.0. Brighton, UK: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/hj5xbel
Schwab, K. (2016, 14 de janeiro). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What it means, and how to respond. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/hlah7ot
Sen, A. (2011). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Silverstone, R. (2007). Media and morality: On the rise of the mediapolis. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Smith, A., & Anderson, J. (2014). Digital life in 2025: AI, robotics, and the future of jobs. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Recuperado de http://tinyurl.com/nzjt4rz
Soete, L. (2016, setembro). Fifty years of research in science, technology and innovation: Why economics still dominates the policy debate. Artigo apresentado na Science Policy
Research Unit 50th Anniversary Conference, University of Sussex, Falmer.
Standeford, D. (2016, 21 de outubro). EC Report Claims 5G to Bring Annual Benefits of Over €100bn. PolicyTracker. Recuperado de https://tinyurl.com/y2rgg4ks
Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2013). A theory of the digital divide. In M. Ragnedda, & G. W. Muschert (Eds.). The digital divide: The internet and social inequality in international perspective I (pp. 29-51). Nova Iorque: Routledge.
Vivarelli, M. (2014). Innovation, employment and skills in advanced and developing countries: A survey of the literature. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(1), 123-154. doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624480106
Williams, R. (1983). Towards 2000. Londres, UK: The Hogarth Press.
Wineburg, S.; McGrew, S.; Breakstone, J., & Ortega, T. (2016). Evaluating information: the Cornerstone of Civic Online Reasoning. Stanford Digital Repository. Recuperado de http://purl.stanford.edu/fv751yt5934
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Gli autori che pubblicano in questa rivista accettano i seguenti termini:
- Gli autori mantengono il copyright e concedono alla rivista il diritto alla prima pubblicazione, con il lavoro simultaneamente concesso in licenza in base alla Licenza di attribuzione Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) che consente la condivisione dell'opera con riconoscimento di paternità e pubblicazione iniziale in questo giornale per scopi non commerciali.
- Gli autori sono autorizzati ad assumere contratti aggiuntivi separatamente, per la distribuzione non esclusiva della versione dell'opera pubblicata in questa rivista (ad esempio, pubblicazione in un archivio istituzionale o come capitolo di un libro), con riconoscimento di paternità e pubblicazione iniziale in questa rivista.
