Relações públicas, pós-verdade e grandes desafios: uma melhor pesquisa para o valor social

Autores

  • Thomas Stoeckle Bournemouth University
  • Ana Adi Quadriga University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-2593.organicom.2023.210366

Palavras-chave:

Grandes mudanças, Partes interessadas, Pós-verdade, Valor social, Modelos de mensuração

Resumo

A trajetória histórica do campo, sua fundamentação neoliberal, a centralidade organizacional e uma confiança excessiva advinda de uma abordagem quantitativa e pragmática são algumas das razões pelas quais acredita-se que as Relações Públicas não estão preparadas para os desafios impostos por ambientes hipercomplexos que emergem do contexto social pós-moderno. Este artigo propõe uma lógica de planejamento revisada e ampliada para execução, mensuração e avaliação das atividades de comunicação com foco nos stakeholders para o enfrentamento de grandes desafios.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Thomas Stoeckle, Bournemouth University

    Universidade de Bournemouth e Academia de Relações Públicas

Referências

Adi, A.; Stoeckle, T. Public Relations as Responsible Persuasion: Activism and Social Change. In: Pompper, D.; Place, K. R.; Weaver, N. (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Public Relations. London: Routledge, 2023. p. 302-314.

BERNAYS, E. L. Crystallizing Public Opinion. New York: Horace Liveright, 1923.

Bernays, E. L. Manipulating Public Opinion: The Why and the How. American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 33, i. 6, p. 958-971, 1928.

Bowen, S. The Nature of Good in Public Relations. What Should be its Normative Ethic? In: Heath, R. L. (ed.). Sage Handbook of Public Relations II. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2010. p. 569-583.

Bowman, S.; Hendy, J. A liquid profession: An ecological approach to the theory and knowledge that underpin the practice of public relations. Public Relations Inquiry, Thousand Oaks, v. 8, i. 3, 333-351, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147x19872799

Buhmann, A.; Macnamara, J.; Zerfass, A. Reviewing the ‘march to standards’ in public relations: a comparative analysis of four seminal measurement and evaluation initiatives. Public Relations Review, Amsterdam, v. 45, i. 4, p. 1-16, 2019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101825

Capizzo, L. What counts amid contention? Measuring perceived intractable problems in public relations. Public Relations Review, Amsterdam, v. 48, i. 2, 1-11, 2022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102179

Capizzo, L. Managing intractability: Wrestling with wicked problems and seeing beyond consensus in public relations. Public Relations Review, Amsterdam, v. 49, i. 1, p. 1-13, 2023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102263

Conrad, M.; Hálfdanarson, G.; Michailidou, A.; Galpin, C.; Pyrhönen, N. Europe in the Age of Post-Truth Politics: Populism, Disinformation and the Public Sphere. New York: Springer, 2023.

Coombs, W. T.; Holladay, S. J. The Handbook of Crisis Communication. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.

Coombs, W. T.; Holladay, S. J. It’s Not Just PR. Public Relations in Society. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, 2014.

Corsa, A. Grand Narratives, Metamodernism, and Global Ethics. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, Hawthorn, v. 14, i. 3, p. 241-272, 2018.

Curry Jansen, S. Stealth Communications: The Spectacular Rise of Public Relations. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017.

de Jong, M. D. T.; Huluba, G.; Beldad, A. D. Different Shades of Greenwashing: Consumers’ Reactions to Environmental Lies, Half-Lies, and Organizations Taking Credit for Following Legal Obligations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Thousand Oaks, v. 34, i. 1, p. 38-76, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919874105

Demetrious, K. Public Relations and Neoliberalism: The Language Practices of Knowledge Formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.

Edwards, L. Organised lying and professional legitimacy: Public relations’ accountability in the disinformation debate. European Journal of Communication, Thousand Oaks, v. 36, i. 2, p. 168-182, 2021.

Emerson, J. Blended Value. In: Anheier, H. K.; Toepler, S. (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. New York: Springer US, 2010. p. 66-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_67

Engemann, K. N.; Engemann, K. J.; Scott, C. W. Organizational Risk Management: Managing for Uncertainty and Ambiguity. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022.

Fearn-Banks, K. Crisis Communication: A Review of Some Best Practices. In: Heath, R. L. (ed.). Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2001. p. 479-486.

Ferguson, M. A. Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships as a public relations paradigm [Article]. Journal of Public Relations Research, Abingdon, v. 30, i. 4, p. 164-178, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2018.1514810

Fuller, S. Post-Truth: Knowledge As a Power Game. London; New York: Anthem, 2018.

Fuller, S. A Player’s Guide to the Post-Truth Condition: The Name of the Game. London; New York: Anthem, 2020.

Gehman, J.; Etzion, D.; Ferraro, F. Robust Action: Advancing a Distinctive Approach to Grand Challenges. In: Gümüsay, A. A.; Marti, E.; Trittin-Ulbrich, H.; Wickert, C. (ed.), Organizing for Societal Grand Challenges. Bingley: Emerald, 2022. vol. 79, p. 259-278. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000079024

Gilpin, D. The eclipse of trust and systemic vulnerability: Theorizing crises in an increasingly complex world. In: Pompper, D.; Place, K. R.; Weaver, N. (ed.). The Routledge Companion to Public Relations. London: Routledge, 2023. p. 136-148.

Grunig, J. E. Public relations and strategic management: Institutionalizing organization–public relationships in contemporary society. Central European Journal of Communication, Warsaw, v. 4, i. 6, p. 11-31, 2011.

Homolak, J. Opportunities and risks of ChatGPT in medicine, science, and academic publishing: a modern Promethean dilemma. Croatian Medical Journal, Zagreb, v. 64, i. 1, p. 1-3, 2023.

Horowitz, A.; Remes, J. A. C. Introducing Critical Disaster Studies. In: Remes, J. A. C.; A. Horowitz (ed.). Critical Disaster Studies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021. p. 1-10.

Howard-Grenville, J.; Spengler, J. Surfing the Grand Challenges Wave in Management Scholarship: How Did We Get Here, Where Are We Now, and What’s Next? In: Gümüsay, A. A.; Marti, E.; Trittin-Ulbrich, H.; Wickert C. (ed.). Organizing for Societal Grand Challenges Bingley: Emerald, 2022. p. 279-295.

Hulme, M. One Earth, Many Futures, No Destination. One Earth, Amsterdam, v. 2, i. 4, p. 309-311, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.03.005

Ihlen, Ø.; Gregory, A.; Luoma-aho, V.; Buhmann, A. Post-truth and public relations: Special section introduction. Public Relations Review, Amsterdam, v. 45, i. 4, 101844, 2019.

Jakobson, M.-L.; King, R.; Moroşanu, L.; Vetik, R. Migration and Integration in Turbulent Times. In: Jakobson, M.-L.; King, R.; Moroşanu, L.; Vetik, R. (ed.). Anxieties of Migration and Integration in Turbulent Times (pp. 1-17). New York: Springer, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23996-0_1

Jasanoff, S.; Simmet, H. R. No funeral bells: Public reason in a ‘post-truth’ age. Social Studies of Science, Thousand Oaks, v. 47, i. 5, p. 751-770, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717731936

Josephson Storm, J. A. Metamodernism: The Future of Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021.

Knowles, S. Narrative by Numbers: How to Tell Powerful and Purposeful Stories with Data. London: Routledge, 2018.

Knowles, S. How To Be Insightful: Unlocking the Superpower that drives Innovation. London: Routledge, 2020.

Knowles, S. Asking Smarter Questions. How to Be an Agent of Insight. London: Routledge, 2023.

Lashitew, A. A. Corporate uptake of the Sustainable Development Goals: Mere greenwashing or an advent of institutional change? Journal of International Business Policy, New York, v. 4, p. 184-200, 2021.

Lilleker, D. G.; Stoeckle, T. The challenges of providing certainty in the face of wicked problems: Analysing the UK government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Affairs, Hoboken, v. 21, n. 4, p. 1-10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2733

Macnamara, J. Evaluating Public Communication. Exploring new models, standards and best practice. London: Routledge, 2018.

Macnamara, J. Organizational Listening in Public Communication: Emerging theory and practice. Sidney: University of Technology Sydney, 2022. Available at: https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/158330/2/Organizational%20Listening%20-%20Emerging%20Theory%20%26%20Practice.pdf

Macnamara, J. A call for reconfiguring evaluation models, pedagogy, and practice: Beyond reporting media-centric outputs and fake impact scores. Public Relations Review, Amsterdam, v. 49, i. 2, p. 1-8, 2023a. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102311

Macnamara, J. Measurement, evaluation + learning (MEL): New approaches for insights, outcomes, and impact. In: Pompper, D.; Place, K. R.; Weaver, N. (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Public Relations. London: Routledge, 2023b. p. 225-236.

Mazzucato, M.; Collington, R. The Big Con: How the Consulting Industry Weakens our Businesses, Infantilizes our Governments and Warps our Economies. London: Allen Lane, 2023.

McKie, D. Updating Public Relations: “New Science”, Research Paradigms, and Uneven Developments. In: Heath, R. L. (ed.). Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2001. p. 75- 92.

Meyer, I. The Resurrection of Modernistic Public Relations – a Metamodern Perspective. ESSACHESS – Journal for Communication Studies, Les Arcs, v. 14, i. 1(27), p. 15-36, 2021. https://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/521

Meyer, I.; Barker, R. A metamodern model for managing stakeholder relationships in non-profit organisations. Communicare: Journal for Communication Sciences in Southern Africa, Centurion, v. 39, n. 1, p. 56-79, 2020. https://journals.co.za/content/journal/10520/EJC-1e965bec02

O’Neil, C. Weapons of Math Distraction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown, 2016.

Oliver, A. G.; Pfarrer, M. D.; Neville, F. Grand Challenges and Female Leaders: An Exploration of Relational Leadership During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Business & Society, Thousand Oaks, p. 1-34, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221141880

Pipere, A.; Mārtinsone, K. Metamodernism and Social Sciences: Scoping the Future. Social Sciences, [s.l.], 11(10), 1-20, 2022. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/10/457

Rawlins, B. L. Prioritizing stakeholders for public relations. Institute for Public Relations, 2006.

Regester, M.; Larkin, J. Risk Issues and Crisis Management in Public Relations: A Casebook of Best Practice. London:

Kogan Page, 2008.

Rittel, H. W. J.; Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, New York, v. 4, n. 2, p. 155-169, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

Rowinski, P. Post-Truth, Post-Press, Post-Europe: Euroscepticism and the Crisis of Political Communication. New York: Springer, 2020.

Santos, C.; Coelho, A.; Marques, A. A systematic literature review on greenwashing and its relationship to stakeholders: state of art and future research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, New York, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00337-5

Savitz, A.; Weber, K. The Triple Bottom Line: How Today’s Best-Run Companies Are Achieving Economic, Social and Environmental Success - and How You Can Too. Hoboken: Wiley, 2012.

Seele, P.; Schultz, M. D. From Greenwashing to Machinewashing: A Model and Future Directions Derived from Reasoning by Analogy. Journal of Business Ethics, New York, v. 178, i. 4, p. 1063-1089, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05054-9

Susen, S. The “Postmodern Turn” in the Social Sciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

SVI. The Purpose of the Principles of Social Value and the SVI Standards. 2022. Available at: https://socialvalueuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/ThePurposeofthePrinciplesofSocialValueandtheSVIStandards-1.pdf

Swiatek, L.; Galloway, C. Artificial intelligence and public relations: Growing opportunities, questions, and concerns. In: Pompper, D.; Place, K. R.; Weaver, N. (ed.). The Routledge Companion to Public Relations. London: Routledge, 2023. p. 352-362.

Tachkova, E. R.; Coombs, W. T. Communicating in Extreme Crises: Lessons from the Edge. London: Routledge, 2022.

Taylor, M.; Kent, M. L. Paradigm shifts in public relations theory. In: Pompper, D.; Place, K. R.; Weaver, N. (ed.). The Routledge Companion to Public Relations. London: Routledge, 2023. p. 103-114.

Thompson, G. Post-Truth Public Relations: Communicating in an Era of Digital Disinformation. London: Routledge, 2020.

Thompson, G. Public relations in a post-truth world. In: Pompper, D.; Place, K. R.; Weaver, N. (ed.). The Routledge Companion to Public Relations. London: Routledge, 2023. p. 162-173.

Toth, E. L. Postmodernism for modernist public relations: the cash value and application of critical research in public relations. Public Relations Review, Amsterdam, v. 28, i. 3, p. 243-250, 2002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00130-3

Veenstra, E. M.; Ellemers, N. ESG Indicators as Organizational Performance Goals: Do Rating Agencies Encourage a Holistic Approach? Sustainability, [s. l.], v. 12, i. 24, p. 1-15, 2020. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/24/10228

Witzel, M. The Power of Humble: Re-imagining the Power of Leaders After COVID‑19. In: Witzel, M. (ed.). Post-Pandemic Leadership: Exploring Solutions to a Crisis. London: Routledge, 2022. p. 127-135.

Worley, C. G.; Jules, C. COVID-19’s uncomfortable revelations about agile and sustainable organizations in a VUCA world. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Thousand Oaks, v. 56, n. 3, p. 279-283, 2020.

Publicado

2023-10-25

Como Citar

STOECKLE, Thomas; ADI, Ana. Relações públicas, pós-verdade e grandes desafios: uma melhor pesquisa para o valor social. Organicom, São Paulo, Brasil, v. 20, n. 42, p. 86–102, 2023. DOI: 10.11606/issn.2238-2593.organicom.2023.210366. Disponível em: https://revistas.usp.br/organicom/article/view/210366.. Acesso em: 15 maio. 2024.