Organization, culture and communication
an approach to supradisciplinary options
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-2593.organicom.2019.157467Keywords:
Discipline, Transdisciplinarity, Organization, System, CommunicationAbstract
This work anticipates another in development, hence its limits are evident. It is concerned about the theoretical possibilities of postulating supradisciplinary relationships based on the knowledge that was constituted in the theory of the organization, studies of organizational culture and the field of communication in formal organizations. It addresses, in the first instance, the need to recover the roots of knowledge organization, so that the notions of discipline and their surrogates make sense in a social historical framework and not exclusively epistemic. Next, we focus on the general characterization of supradiscipline in response to the growing complexity of advanced capitalism, its aporias and critical moments. It ends with the presentation of some minimum premises for the joint study of communication, culture and the organizational system, recognizing that it is in that domain, the formal organization, where the technodiscursive imperatives are generated for operate as a closure on the epistemic interests of those two areas.
Downloads
References
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. ¿Qué es un dispositivo?. Sociológica, México, DF, ano 26, n. 73, p. 249-264, 2011.
ARISTÓTELES. Física. México, DF: Unam, 2005.
ARISTÓTELES. Lógica. Madrid: Gredos, 2015a.
ARISTÓTELES. Metafísica. Madrid: Gredos, 2015b.
BAILLARGEON, Normand. L’éducation. Paris: Flammarion, 2011.
BECK, Ulrich. La sociedad del riesgo global. Madrid: Siglo XXI, 2006.
BECK, Ulrich; GIDDENS, Anthony; LASH, Scott. Modernización reflexiva. Madrid: Alianza, 2008.
BEUCHOT, Mauricio. Sistema y sistematicidad en la filosofía de Santo Tomás de Aquino. In: BENÍTEZ, Laura; ROBLES, José Antonio (comp.). Filosofía y sistema. México, DF: Unam, 1992. p. 7-15.
BOYER, Robert. The regulation school. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
DRISKILL, Gerald; BRENTON, Angela. Organizational culture in action. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2011.
FARA, Patricia. Breve historia de la ciencia. Madrid: Ariel, 2010.
FRODEMAN, Robert; KLEIN, Julie Thompson; PACHECO, Roberto Carlos (ed.). The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
HOFSTEDE, Geert. Culturas y organizaciones. Madrid: Alianza, 2001.
HUSSERL, Edmundo. Crisis de las ciencias europeas. Madrid: Alianza, 2008.
KEYTON, Joann. Communication and organizational culture. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2011.
KLEIN, Julie Thompson. Crossing Boundaries: knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1996.
KLEIN, Julie Thompson. Humanities, culture and interdisciplinarity. Albany: Suny Press, 2005.
KLEIN, Julie Thompson. A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In: FRODEMAN, Robert; KLEIN, Julie Thompson; PACHECO, Roberto Carlos (ed.). The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. p. 15-30.
KUHN, Timothy; ASHCRAFT, Karen, COOREN, Francois (comp.). The work of communication: relational perspectives on working and organizing in contemporary capitalism. New York: Routledge, 2017.
LEUCIPO. Los filósofos presocráticos. Madrid: Gredos, 2015. v. 2.
LULIO, Raimundo. Doctrina pueril. In: TORRES, Eduardo (comp.). Antología del pensamiento medieval. La Habana: Ediciones de Ciencias Sociales, 1975. p. 515-542.
MORIN, Edgar. Epistemología de la complejidad. In: SCHNITMAN, Dora (coord.). Nuevos paradigmas, cultura y subjetividad. Barcelona: Paidós, 1995. p. 421-446.
MORRIS, Charles. Signos, lenguaje y conducta. Buenos Aires: Losada, 2003.
REIS, Verusca Moss Simões dos; VIDEIRA, Antonio Passos. Transdisciplinariedad y filosofía de la ciencia, ¿una solución posible al problema de la privatización del conocimiento?. In: PELÁEZ, Álvaro; SUÁREZ, Rodolfo (ed.). Observaciones filosóficas en torno a la transdisciplinariedad. México, DF: Ántrophos: UAM, 2010. p. 149-177.
NICOLESCU, Basarab. Transdisciplinarity: theory and practice. New York: Hampton Press, 2008.
NICOLESCU, Basarab. Methodology of transdisciplinarity. Transdisciplinarity Journal Engineering & Science, Lubbock, v. 1, n. 1, p. 19-38, 2010.
ORGUE. In: LE NOUVEAU Petit Robert de la langue française. Paris: LR, 2008. p. 1758.
PELÁEZ, Álvaro; SUÁREZ, Rodolfo (ed.). Observaciones filosóficas en torno a la transdisciplinariedad. México, DF : Ántrophos: UAM, 2010.
PLATÓN. Crátilo. In: PLATÓN. Diálogos. Madrid: Gredos, 2015a. v. 2.
PLATÓN. Filebo. In: PLATÓN. Diálogos. Madrid: Gredos, 2015b. v. 6.
PLATÓN. República. In: PLATÓN. Diálogos. Madrid: Gredos, 2015c. v. 4.
REPKO, Allen; NEWELL, William; SZOSTAK, Rich. Case studies in interdisciplinary research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2012.
STRATHERN, Marilyn. Commons and borderlands: working papers on interdisciplinarity. Herefordshire: Sean Kingston, 2004.
TIROLE, Jean. La economía del bien común. Barcelona: Taurus, 2017.
VARRÓN. La lengua latina: libros V-VI. Madrid: Gredos, 1998a.
VARRÓN. La lengua latina: libros VII-X. Madrid: Gredos, 1998b.
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Investigaciones filosóficas. México, DF: Unam, 2002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
A submissão implica a cessão de direitos da primeira publicação à revista Organicom, sem pagamento. Os autores podem estabelecer por separado acordos adicionais para a distribuição não exclusiva de versão da obra publicada na revista (como colocar em um repositório institucional ou publicar um livro), com o devido reconhecimento de sua publicação inicial na revista Organicom.
